From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f197.google.com (mail-pf0-f197.google.com [209.85.192.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659606B0007 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:07:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f197.google.com with SMTP id n17-v6so14058063pff.10 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com. [134.134.136.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9-v6si16588770pgi.502.2018.07.10.07.07.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 05/21] mm, THP, swap: Support PMD swap mapping in free_swap_and_cache()/swap_free() References: <20180622035151.6676-1-ying.huang@intel.com> <20180622035151.6676-6-ying.huang@intel.com> <49178f48-6635-353c-678d-3db436d3f9c3@linux.intel.com> <87y3ejh8ax.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <836c95a7-5f03-6d9e-6f0a-839b5fb8ba99@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:07:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y3ejh8ax.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Huang, Ying" , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrea Arcangeli , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Shaohua Li , Hugh Dickins , Minchan Kim , Rik van Riel , Naoya Horiguchi , Zi Yan , Daniel Jordan On 07/10/2018 12:13 AM, Huang, Ying wrote: > Dave Hansen writes: >> The code non-resuse was, and continues to be, IMNHO, one of the largest >> sources of bugs with the original THP implementation. It might be >> infeasible to do here, but let's at least give it as much of a go as we can. > > I totally agree that we should unify the code path for huge and normal > page/swap if possible. One concern is code size for !CONFIG_THP_SWAP. I've honestly never heard that as an argument before. In general, our .c files implement *full* functionality: the most complex case. The headers #ifdef that functionality down because of our .config or architecture. The thing that matters here is debugging and reviewing the _complicated_ case, IMNHO. > The original method is good for that. The new method may introduce some > huge swap related code that is hard to be eliminated for > !CONFIG_THP_SWAP. Andrew Morton pointed this out for the patchset of > the first step of the THP swap optimization. > > This may be mitigated at least partly via, > > ` > #ifdef CONFIG_THP_SWAP > #define nr_swap_entries(nr) (nr) > #else > #define nr_swap_entries(nr) 1 > #endif > > void do_something(swp_entry_t entry, int __nr_entries) > { > int i, nr_entries = nr_swap_entries(__nr_entries); > > if (nr_entries = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER) > ; /* huge swap specific */ > else > ; /* normal swap specific */ > > for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) { > ; /* do something for each entry */ > } > > /* ... */ > } > ` While that isn't perfect, it's better than the current state of things. While you are refactoring things, I think you also need to take a good look at roughly chopping this series in half by finding another stopping point. You've done a great job so far of trickling this functionality in so far, but 21 patches is quite a bit, and the set is only going to get larger.