From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] zram: recompression priority param should override algo
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 17:21:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <831636c74ca6d72317de02d96585cc6833d082e6.1772180459.git.senozhatsky@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a5d53d19a8dbd51d7d81d153676895163e0735e.1772180459.git.senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Recompression algorithm lookup by name is ambiguous and
can lead to unexpected results. The problem is that
the system can configure the same algorithm but with
different parameters (compression level, C/D-dicts, etc.)
multiple times:
[zstd clevel=3] [zstd clevel=8 dict=/etc/dict]
making it impossible to distinguish compressors by name.
It is advised to always use "priority". Additionally,
override "algo" with "priority", when both params are
provided.
Suggested-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 6ca5a76c3865..118b0b277e37 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -2594,6 +2594,16 @@ static ssize_t recompress_store(struct device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /*
+ * "priority" overrides "algo".
+ *
+ * We can have several algorithms configured with
+ * different params (compression/acceleration level,
+ * C/D-dict, etc.) but under the same name.
+ *
+ * "algorithm" name lookup is ambiguous.
+ */
+ algo = NULL;
prio_max = min(prio + 1, ZRAM_MAX_COMPS);
continue;
}
--
2.53.0.473.g4a7958ca14-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 8:21 [PATCH 1/5] zram: do not autocorrect bad recompression parameters Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-27 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] zram: drop ->num_active_comps Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-27 8:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2026-02-27 8:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] zram: update recompression documentation Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-02-27 8:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] zram: remove chained recompression Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=831636c74ca6d72317de02d96585cc6833d082e6.1772180459.git.senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox