From: "Nicolai Hähnle" <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
To: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>,
christian.koenig@amd.com, "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Roman Gushchin" <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Per file OOM badness
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:36:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82d5894f-f4ea-98cc-068a-5d470f5267df@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e511ba10-7032-36cc-f22c-2f6bb05f9f6e@daenzer.net>
On 30.01.2018 12:34, Michel DA?nzer wrote:
> On 2018-01-30 12:28 PM, Christian KA?nig wrote:
>> Am 30.01.2018 um 12:02 schrieb Michel DA?nzer:
>>> On 2018-01-30 11:40 AM, Christian KA?nig wrote:
>>>> Am 30.01.2018 um 10:43 schrieb Michel DA?nzer:
>>>>> [SNIP]
>>>>>> Would it be ok to hang onto potentially arbitrary mmget references
>>>>>> essentially forever? If that's ok I think we can do your process based
>>>>>> account (minus a few minor inaccuracies for shared stuff perhaps,
>>>>>> but no
>>>>>> one cares about that).
>>>>> Honestly, I think you and Christian are overthinking this. Let's try
>>>>> charging the memory to every process which shares a buffer, and go from
>>>>> there.
>>>> My problem is that this needs to be bullet prove.
>>>>
>>>> For example imagine an application which allocates a lot of BOs, then
>>>> calls fork() and let the parent process die. The file descriptor lives
>>>> on in the child process, but the memory is not accounted against the
>>>> child.
>>> What exactly are you referring to by "the file descriptor" here?
>>
>> The file descriptor used to identify the connection to the driver. In
>> other words our drm_file structure in the kernel.
>>
>>> What happens to BO handles in general in this case? If both parent and
>>> child process keep the same handle for the same BO, one of them
>>> destroying the handle will result in the other one not being able to use
>>> it anymore either, won't it?
>> Correct.
>>
>> That usage is actually not useful at all, but we already had
>> applications which did exactly that by accident.
>>
>> Not to mention that somebody could do it on purpose.
>
> Can we just prevent child processes from using their parent's DRM file
> descriptors altogether? Allowing it seems like a bad idea all around.
Existing protocols pass DRM fds between processes though, don't they?
Not child processes perhaps, but special-casing that seems like awful
design.
Cheers,
Nicolai
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-18 16:47 Andrey Grodzovsky
2018-01-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] fs: add OOM badness callback in file_operatrations struct Andrey Grodzovsky
2018-01-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] oom: take per file badness into account Andrey Grodzovsky
2018-01-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/gem: adjust per file OOM badness on handling buffers Andrey Grodzovsky
2018-01-19 6:01 ` Chunming Zhou
2018-01-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: Use drm_oom_badness for amdgpu Andrey Grodzovsky
2018-01-30 9:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-01-30 12:42 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2018-01-18 17:00 ` [RFC] Per file OOM badness Michal Hocko
2018-01-18 17:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-18 20:01 ` Eric Anholt
2018-01-19 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-19 8:39 ` Christian König
2018-01-19 9:32 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-19 9:58 ` Christian König
2018-01-19 10:02 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-19 15:07 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-21 6:50 ` Eric Anholt
2018-01-19 10:40 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-19 11:37 ` Christian König
2018-01-19 12:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-19 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-19 16:54 ` Christian König
2018-01-23 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-19 16:48 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-19 8:35 ` Christian König
2018-01-19 6:01 ` He, Roger
2018-01-19 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-19 10:02 ` roger
2018-01-23 15:27 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-01-23 15:36 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-23 16:39 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-24 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-24 10:27 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-24 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-24 11:23 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-24 11:50 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-24 12:11 ` Christian König
2018-01-30 9:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-01-30 9:43 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 10:40 ` Christian König
2018-01-30 11:02 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 11:28 ` Christian König
2018-01-30 11:34 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 11:36 ` Nicolai Hähnle [this message]
2018-01-30 11:42 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 11:56 ` Christian König
2018-01-30 15:52 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 10:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-01-30 10:48 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 11:35 ` Nicolai Hähnle
2018-01-24 14:31 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 9:29 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-30 10:28 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-26 14:36 ` Lucas Stach
2018-04-04 9:09 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-04-04 9:36 ` Lucas Stach
2018-04-04 9:46 ` Michel Dänzer
2018-01-19 5:39 ` He, Roger
2018-01-19 8:17 ` Christian König
2018-01-22 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-23 1:59 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82d5894f-f4ea-98cc-068a-5d470f5267df@gmail.com \
--to=nhaehnle@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=michel@daenzer.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox