Re: CMA: test_pages_isolated failures in alloc_contig_range

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Laura,

On Monday 27 October 2014 13:38:19 Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/26/2014 2:09 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I've run into a CMA-related issue while testing a DMA engine driver with
> > dmatest on a Renesas R-Car ARM platform.
> > 
> > When allocating contiguous memory through CMA the kernel prints the
> > following messages to the kernel log.
> > 
> > [   99.770000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
> > [  124.220000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
> > [  127.550000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b845, 6b846) failed
> > [  132.850000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b845, 6b846) failed
> > [  151.390000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
> > [  166.490000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
> > [  181.450000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b845, 6b846) failed
> > 
> > I've stripped the dmatest module down as much as possible to remove any
> > hardware dependencies and came up with the following implementation.
> 
> ...
> 
> > Loading the module will start 4 threads that will allocate and free DMA
> > coherent memory in a tight loop and eventually produce the error. It seems
> > like the probability of occurrence grows with the number of threads, which
> > could indicate a race condition.
> > 
> > The tests have been run on 3.18-rc1, but previous tests on 3.16 did
> > exhibit the same behaviour.
> > 
> > I'm not that familiar with the CMA internals, help would be appreciated to
> > debug the problem.
> 
> Are you actually seeing allocation failures or is it just the messages?

It's just the messages, I haven't noticed allocation failures.

> The messages themselves may be harmless if the allocation is succeeding.
> It's an indication that the particular range could not be isolated and
> therefore another range should be used for the CMA allocation. Joonsoo
> Kim had a patch series[1] that was designed to correct some problems with
> isolation and from my testing it helps fix some CMA related errors. You
> might try picking that up to see if it helps.
> 
> Thanks,
> Laura
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/23/90

I've tested the patches but they don't seem to have any influence on the 
isolation test failures.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>