From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mm: finish three more folio conversion
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:41:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82225d4c-2a6e-4ae5-ba7e-3b92f1d3b0be@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZsNGnRTpKPbXthaY@casper.infradead.org>
On 2024/8/19 21:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 07:13:18PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2024/8/19 17:59, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 18.08.24 22:33, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>>> Convert to use folios then remove find_subpage(), thp_nr_pages()
>>>>> and PageTransHuge().
>>>>
>>>> This patch series is premature. None of these APIs are particularly
>>>> advantageous to remove (they're inline functions, so cost nothing unless
>>>> used).
>>> I do enjoy seeing the removal of thp_nr_pages(), though :)
>>>
>>
>> The thp_nr_pages() and PageTransHuge() removing are found when improve
>> memory hotplug[1], also find_subpage() has issue[2], this is where patches
>> come from, since there are only few callers, I think we can
>> cleanup it earlier?
>
> No, leave them alone until we get rid of readahead_batch() and friends.
>
It is beyond my scope about changing fuse/squashfs to remove
readahead_batch, will separate find_subpage/set_huge_pmd changes,
thanks for you suggestion.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-20 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-17 9:51 Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: remove find_subpage() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-19 11:02 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-19 13:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-20 8:22 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-20 8:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-20 8:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 9:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] pagemap: use a folio in __readahead_batch() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 9:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: remove thp_nr_pages() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 9:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: khugepaged: pass a folio for set_huge_pmd() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 9:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove PageTransHuge() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-18 20:33 ` [PATCH 0/5] mm: finish three more folio conversion Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-19 9:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 11:13 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-19 13:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-20 8:41 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82225d4c-2a6e-4ae5-ba7e-3b92f1d3b0be@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox