linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 03/17] mm: Introduce try_vma_alloc_movable_folio()
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:49:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81f160ab-e66f-83f4-ad08-352454690119@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230414130303.2345383-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com>



On 4/14/2023 9:02 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Opportunistically attempt to allocate high-order folios in highmem,
> optionally zeroed. Retry with lower orders all the way to order-0, until
> success. Although, of note, order-1 allocations are skipped since a
> large folio must be at least order-2 to work with the THP machinery. The
> user must check what they got with folio_order().
> 
> This will be used to oportunistically allocate large folios for
> anonymous memory with a sensible fallback under memory pressure.
> 
> For attempts to allocate non-0 orders, we set __GFP_NORETRY to prevent
> high latency due to reclaim, instead preferring to just try for a lower
> order. The same approach is used by the readahead code when allocating
> large folios.
I am not sure whether anonymous page can share the same approach as page
cache. The latency of new page cache is dominated by IO. So it may be not
big deal to retry with different order some times.

Retry too many times could bring latency for anonymous page allocation.

Regards
Yin, Fengwei

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 9d5e8be49f3b..ca32f59acef2 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2989,6 +2989,39 @@ static vm_fault_t fault_dirty_shared_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static inline struct folio *vma_alloc_movable_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +				unsigned long vaddr, int order, bool zeroed)
> +{
> +	gfp_t gfp = order > 0 ? __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN : 0;
> +
> +	if (zeroed)
> +		return vma_alloc_zeroed_movable_folio(vma, vaddr, gfp, order);
> +	else
> +		return vma_alloc_folio(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE | gfp, order, vma,
> +								vaddr, false);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Opportunistically attempt to allocate high-order folios, retrying with lower
> + * orders all the way to order-0, until success. order-1 allocations are skipped
> + * since a folio must be at least order-2 to work with the THP machinery. The
> + * user must check what they got with folio_order(). vaddr can be any virtual
> + * address that will be mapped by the allocated folio.
> + */
> +static struct folio *try_vma_alloc_movable_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +				unsigned long vaddr, int order, bool zeroed)
> +{
> +	struct folio *folio;
> +
> +	for (; order > 1; order--) {
> +		folio = vma_alloc_movable_folio(vma, vaddr, order, zeroed);
> +		if (folio)
> +			return folio;
> +	}
> +
> +	return vma_alloc_movable_folio(vma, vaddr, 0, zeroed);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Handle write page faults for pages that can be reused in the current vma
>   *
> --
> 2.25.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14 13:02 [RFC v2 PATCH 00/17] variable-order, large folios for anonymous memory Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 01/17] mm: Expose clear_huge_page() unconditionally Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 02/17] mm: pass gfp flags and order to vma_alloc_zeroed_movable_folio() Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 03/17] mm: Introduce try_vma_alloc_movable_folio() Ryan Roberts
2023-04-17  8:49   ` Yin, Fengwei [this message]
2023-04-17 10:11     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 04/17] mm: Implement folio_add_new_anon_rmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 05/17] mm: Routines to determine max anon folio allocation order Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 14:09   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-14 14:38     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 15:37       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-04-14 16:06         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 16:18           ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-04-14 16:31             ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 06/17] mm: Allocate large folios for anonymous memory Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 07/17] mm: Allow deferred splitting of arbitrary large anon folios Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 08/17] mm: Implement folio_move_anon_rmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 09/17] mm: Update wp_page_reuse() to operate on range of pages Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 10/17] mm: Reuse large folios for anonymous memory Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 11/17] mm: Split __wp_page_copy_user() into 2 variants Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 12/17] mm: ptep_clear_flush_range_notify() macro for batch operation Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:02 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 13/17] mm: Implement folio_remove_rmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:03 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 14/17] mm: Copy large folios for anonymous memory Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:03 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 15/17] mm: Convert zero page to large folios on write Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:03 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 16/17] mm: mmap: Align unhinted maps to highest anon folio order Ryan Roberts
2023-04-17  8:25   ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-04-17 10:13     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-14 13:03 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 17/17] mm: Batch-zap large anonymous folio PTE mappings Ryan Roberts
2023-04-17  8:04 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 00/17] variable-order, large folios for anonymous memory Yin, Fengwei
2023-04-17 10:19   ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-17  8:19 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-04-17 10:28   ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-17 10:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-17 11:43   ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-17 14:05     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-17 15:38       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-17 15:44         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-17 16:15           ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-26 10:41           ` Ryan Roberts
2023-05-17 13:58             ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-18 11:23               ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-19 10:12       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-04-19 10:51         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-19 11:13           ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=81f160ab-e66f-83f4-ad08-352454690119@intel.com \
    --to=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox