linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm,memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from hotadded memory
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:54:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <815a98e1-3b2e-e5c8-5074-7f46a363adb8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403085042.t5wcyvaolxiw65rr@d104.suse.de>

On 03.04.19 10:50, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:41:35AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> That being said it should be the caller of the hotplug code to tell
>>> the vmemmap allocation strategy. For starter, I would only pack vmemmaps
>>> for "regular" kernel zone memory. Movable zones should be more careful.
>>> We can always re-evaluate later when there is a strong demand for huge
>>> pages on movable zones but this is not the case now because those pages
>>> are not really movable in practice.
>>
>> Remains the issue with potential different user trying to remove memory
>> it didn't add in some other granularity. We then really have to identify
>> and isolate that case.
> 
> If we let the caller specify whether it wants vmemmaps per memblock or range,
> I would trust that caller to do the correct thing and specify one thing or
> another depending on what it wants to do in the future.
> 
> So, say a driver adds 512MB memory and it specifies that it wants vmemmaps per
> memblock because later on it will like to hot-remove in chunks of 128MB.
> 

I am talking about the memtrace and ACPI thing. Otherwise I agree, trust
the user iff the user is the same person adding/removing memory.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-28 13:43 Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, memory_hotplug: cleanup memory offline path Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:43   ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm, memory_hotplug: provide a more generic restrictions for memory hotplug Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:46   ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:48     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-04 10:04     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-04 10:06       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-04 10:31       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-04 12:04         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from the added memory range for sparse-vmemmap Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, sparse: rename kmalloc_section_memmap, __kfree_section_memmap Oscar Salvador
2019-03-28 15:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm,memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from hotadded memory David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 15:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  8:45     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29  8:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  9:01         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  9:20         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29 13:42       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-01  7:59         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-01 11:53           ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-02  8:28             ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-02  8:39               ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-02 12:48               ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:01                 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:12                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:17                     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  8:37                       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:41                         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  8:49                           ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  8:53                             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  8:50                           ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:54                             ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-04-03  9:40                         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03 10:46                           ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-04 10:25                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-03  8:34                     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:36                       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29  8:30   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29  8:51     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-29 22:23 ` John Hubbard
2019-04-01  7:52   ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=815a98e1-3b2e-e5c8-5074-7f46a363adb8@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox