From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, shy828301@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] add mTHP support for anonymous share pages
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:26:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80b5f87e-c156-4ccc-98f0-96f1fd864273@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1f68109-7665-4905-996f-f1067dfa2cb6@linux.alibaba.com>
On 24/04/2024 07:55, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/4/23 18:41, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 22/04/2024 08:02, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> Anonymous pages have already been supported for multi-size (mTHP) allocation
>>> through commit 19eaf44954df, that can allow THP to be configured through the
>>> sysfs interface located at
>>> '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepage-XXkb/enabled'.
>>>
>>> However, the anonymous shared pages will ignore the anonymous mTHP rule
>>> configured through the sysfs interface, and can only use the PMD-mapped
>>> THP, that is not reasonable. Many implement anonymous page sharing through
>>> mmap(MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS), especially in database usage scenarios,
>>> therefore, users expect to apply an unified mTHP strategy for anonymous pages,
>>> also including the anonymous shared pages, in order to enjoy the benefits of
>>> mTHP. For example, lower latency than PMD-mapped THP, smaller memory bloat
>>> than PMD-mapped THP, contiguous PTEs on ARM architecture to reduce TLB miss etc.
>>
>> This sounds like a very useful addition!
>>
>> Out of interest, can you point me at any workloads (and off-the-shelf benchmarks
>> for those workloads) that predominantly use shared anon memory?
>
> As far as I know, some database related workloads make extensive use of shared
> anonymous page, such as PolarDB[1] in our Alibaba fleet, or MySQL likely also
> uses shared anonymous memory. And I still need to do some investigation to
> measure the performance.
>
> [1] https://github.com/ApsaraDB/PolarDB-for-PostgreSQL
Thanks for the pointer!
>
>>> The primary strategy is that, the use of huge pages for anonymous shared pages
>>> still follows the global control determined by the mount option "huge="
>>> parameter
>>> or the sysfs interface at '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled'.
>>> The utilization of mTHP is allowed only when the global 'huge' switch is
>>> enabled.
>>> Subsequently, the mTHP sysfs interface
>>> (/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepage-XXkb/enabled)
>>> is checked to determine the mTHP size that can be used for large folio
>>> allocation
>>> for these anonymous shared pages.
>>
>> I'm not sure about this proposed control mechanism; won't it break
>> compatibility? I could be wrong, but I don't think shmem's use of THP used to
>> depend upon the value of /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled? So it
>
> Yes, I realized this after more testing.
>
>> doesn't make sense to me that we now depend upon the
>> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepage-XXkb/enabled values (which by
>> default disables all sizes except 2M, which is set to "inherit" from
>> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled).
>>
>> The other problem is that shmem_enabled has a different set of options
>> (always/never/within_size/advise/deny/force) to enabled (always/madvise/never)
>>
>> Perhaps it would be cleaner to do the same trick we did for enabled; Introduce
>> /mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepage-XXkb/shmem_enabled, which can have all the
>> same values as the top-level /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled,
>> plus the additional "inherit" option. By default all sizes will be set to
>> "never" except 2M, which is set to "inherit".
>
> Sounds good to me. But I do not want to copy all same values from top-level
> '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled':
> always within_size advise never deny force
>
> For mTHP's shmem_enabled interface, we can just keep below values:
> always within_size advise never
>
> Cause when checking if mTHP can be used for anon shmem, 'deny' is equal to
> 'never', and 'force' is equal to 'always'.
I'll admit it wasn't completely clear to me after reading the docs, but my rough
understanding is:
- /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled controls
mmap(SHARED|ANON) allocations (mostly; see rule 3)
- huge=... controls tmpfs allocations
- deny and force in shmem_enabled are equivalent to never and always for
mmap(SHARED|ANON) but additionally override all tmpfs mounts so they act as
if they were mounted with huge=never or huge=always
Is that correct? If so, then I think it still makes sense to support per-size
deny/force. Certainly if a per-size control is set to "inherit" and the
top-level control is set to deny or force, you would need that to mean something.
>
>> Of course the huge= mount option would also need to take a per-size option in
>> this case. e.g. huge=2048kB:advise,64kB:always
>
> IMO, I do not want to change the global 'huge=' mount option, which can control
> both anon shmem and tmpfs, but mTHP now is only applied for anon shmem. So let's
How does huge= control anon shmem? I thought it was only for mounted
filesystems; so tmpfs? Perhaps my mental model for how this works is broken...
> keep it be same with the global sysfs interface:
> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled.
>
> For tmpfs large folio strategy, I plan to address it later, and we may need more
> discussion to determine if it should follow the file large folio strategy or not
> (no investigation now).
OK. But until you get to tmpfs, you'll need an interim definition for what it
means if a per-size control is set to "inherit" and the top-level control is set
to deny/force.
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
No problem! Thanks for doing the work!
>
>>> TODO:
>>> - More testing and provide some performance data.
>>> - Need more discussion about the large folio allocation strategy for a
>>> 'regular
>>> file' operation created by memfd_create(), for example using ftruncate(fd) to
>>> specify
>>> the 'file' size, which need to follow the anonymous mTHP rule too?
>>> - Do not split the large folio when share memory swap out.
>>> - Can swap in a large folio for share memory.
>>>
>>> Baolin Wang (5):
>>> mm: memory: extend finish_fault() to support large folio
>>> mm: shmem: add an 'order' parameter for shmem_alloc_hugefolio()
>>> mm: shmem: add THP validation for PMD-mapped THP related statistics
>>> mm: shmem: add mTHP support for anonymous share pages
>>> mm: shmem: add anonymous share mTHP counters
>>>
>>> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 4 +-
>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 8 ++-
>>> mm/memory.c | 25 +++++++---
>>> mm/shmem.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>> 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 7:02 Baolin Wang
2024-04-22 7:02 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: memory: extend finish_fault() to support large folio Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 8:39 ` Lance Yang
2024-04-25 7:04 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 11:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-24 3:23 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-24 8:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-24 9:26 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-24 9:57 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-22 7:02 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm: shmem: add an 'order' parameter for shmem_alloc_hugefolio() Baolin Wang
2024-04-24 6:28 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-04-24 6:55 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-22 7:02 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: shmem: add THP validation for PMD-mapped THP related statistics Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 1:13 ` Barry Song
2024-04-22 7:02 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] mm: shmem: add mTHP support for anonymous share pages Baolin Wang
2024-04-22 7:02 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] mm: shmem: add anonymous share mTHP counters Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 1:17 ` Barry Song
2024-04-23 1:46 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 11:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-24 3:48 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 9:45 ` Lance Yang
2024-04-23 11:22 ` Lance Yang
2024-04-24 3:49 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 11:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-24 6:10 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-24 7:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-24 8:15 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-24 9:31 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-23 10:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] add mTHP support for anonymous share pages Ryan Roberts
2024-04-23 11:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-24 6:55 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-24 8:26 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-04-24 9:55 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-24 10:01 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-24 13:49 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-24 14:20 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-25 6:20 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-25 8:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-25 8:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-25 8:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-25 8:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-25 9:05 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-25 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-25 9:50 ` Baolin Wang
2024-04-25 10:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-25 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80b5f87e-c156-4ccc-98f0-96f1fd864273@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox