From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B5876B01B1 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 16:23:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Duyck, Alexander H" Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:23:27 -0700 Subject: RE: [PATCH] slub: move kmem_cache_node into it's own cacheline Message-ID: <80769D7B14936844A23C0C43D9FBCF0F256284B0C1@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20100520234714.6633.75614.stgit@gitlad.jf.intel.com> <80769D7B14936844A23C0C43D9FBCF0F256284AECC@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: Christoph Lameter wrote: > struct kmem_cache is allocated without any alignment so the alignment > spec does not work. >=20 > If you want this then you also need to align struct kmem_cache. > internode aligned would require the kmem_cache to be page aligned. So > lets drop the hunk from this patch for now. A separate patch may > convince us to merge aligning kmem_cache_node within kmem_cache. I will pull that hunk out, test it, and resubmit within the next hour or so= if everything looks good. Thanks, Alex= -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org