linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	 John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:40:16 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7juf5mznp2fzy6tt2rs7dsjqdyfglzjiwkavoaezq7766csdnd@irbgevj6jesk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260210115653.92413-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

On 2026-02-10 at 22:56 +1100, Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> wrote...
> If hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page,
> trying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration,
> to ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.
> 
> However, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work
> item to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the
> spinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and
> we end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never
> resolved.
> 
> This can happen, for example if the process holding the
> device-private folio lock is stuck in
>    migrate_device_unmap()->lru_add_drain_all()
> sinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item
> to be run on all online cpus to complete.
> 
> A prerequisite for this to happen is:
> a) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in
>    migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call
>    lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a
>    folio lock is held on a zone device folio.
> b) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount > 1 which causes
>    at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to
>    try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to
>    lru_add_drain_all().
> c) No or voluntary only preemption.
> 
> This all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by
> the "xe_exec_system_allocator" igt test.
> 
> Resolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the
> folio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().
> 
> Rename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to
> softleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to
> indicate the new use-case.
> 
> Future code improvements might consider moving
> the lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be
> called *after* all pages have migration entries inserted.
> That would eliminate also b) above.
> 
> v2:
> - Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(),
>   eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked
>   in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton)
> v3:
> - Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the
>   !CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot)
> v4:
> - Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to
>   softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple)
> v5:
> - Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION
>   version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().

Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>

> - Modify wording around function names in the commit message
>   (Andrew Morton)
> 
> Suggested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> Fixes: 1afaeb8293c9 ("mm/migrate: Trylock device page in do_swap_page")
> Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.15+
> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> #v3
> ---
>  include/linux/migrate.h | 10 +++++++++-
>  mm/filemap.c            | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  mm/memory.c             |  3 ++-
>  mm/migrate.c            |  8 ++++----
>  mm/migrate_device.c     |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> index 26ca00c325d9..d5af2b7f577b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
>  
>  int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
>  		struct folio *dst, struct folio *src);
> -void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
> +void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
>  		__releases(ptl);
>  void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio);
>  int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
> @@ -97,6 +97,14 @@ static inline int set_movable_ops(const struct movable_operations *ops, enum pag
>  	return -ENOSYS;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
> +	__releases(ptl)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(ptl);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MIGRATION */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index ebd75684cb0a..d98e4883f13d 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1379,14 +1379,16 @@ static inline int folio_wait_bit_common(struct folio *folio, int bit_nr,
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
>  /**
> - * migration_entry_wait_on_locked - Wait for a migration entry to be removed
> - * @entry: migration swap entry.
> + * softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked - Wait for a migration entry or
> + * device_private entry to be removed.
> + * @entry: migration or device_private swap entry.
>   * @ptl: already locked ptl. This function will drop the lock.
>   *
> - * Wait for a migration entry referencing the given page to be removed. This is
> + * Wait for a migration entry referencing the given page, or device_private
> + * entry referencing a dvice_private page to be unlocked. This is
>   * equivalent to folio_put_wait_locked(folio, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) except
>   * this can be called without taking a reference on the page. Instead this
> - * should be called while holding the ptl for the migration entry referencing
> + * should be called while holding the ptl for @entry referencing
>   * the page.
>   *
>   * Returns after unlocking the ptl.
> @@ -1394,7 +1396,7 @@ static inline int folio_wait_bit_common(struct folio *folio, int bit_nr,
>   * This follows the same logic as folio_wait_bit_common() so see the comments
>   * there.
>   */
> -void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
> +void softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
>  	__releases(ptl)
>  {
>  	struct wait_page_queue wait_page;
> @@ -1428,6 +1430,9 @@ void migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_t entry, spinlock_t *ptl)
>  	 * If a migration entry exists for the page the migration path must hold
>  	 * a valid reference to the page, and it must take the ptl to remove the
>  	 * migration entry. So the page is valid until the ptl is dropped.
> +	 * Similarly any path attempting to drop the last reference to a
> +	 * device-private page needs to grab the ptl to remove the device-private
> +	 * entry.
>  	 */
>  	spin_unlock(ptl);
>  
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index da360a6eb8a4..20172476a57f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4684,7 +4684,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  				unlock_page(vmf->page);
>  				put_page(vmf->page);
>  			} else {
> -				pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
> +				pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
> +				softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, vmf->ptl);
>  			}
>  		} else if (softleaf_is_hwpoison(entry)) {
>  			ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 4688b9e38cd2..cf6449b4202e 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ void migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
>  	if (!softleaf_is_migration(entry))
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
> +	softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
>  	return;
>  out:
>  	spin_unlock(ptl);
> @@ -531,10 +531,10 @@ void migration_entry_wait_huge(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, p
>  		 * If migration entry existed, safe to release vma lock
>  		 * here because the pgtable page won't be freed without the
>  		 * pgtable lock released.  See comment right above pgtable
> -		 * lock release in migration_entry_wait_on_locked().
> +		 * lock release in softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
>  		 */
>  		hugetlb_vma_unlock_read(vma);
> -		migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
> +		softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ void pmd_migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
>  	ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
>  	if (!pmd_is_migration_entry(*pmd))
>  		goto unlock;
> -	migration_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd), ptl);
> +	softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd), ptl);
>  	return;
>  unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(ptl);
> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
> index 23379663b1e1..deab89fd4541 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_huge_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long start,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
> -			migration_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
> +			softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(entry, ptl);
>  			spin_unlock(ptl);
>  			return -EAGAIN;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-10 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-10 11:56 Thomas Hellström
2026-02-10 22:40 ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2026-02-11 22:23 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-02-11 22:54   ` Alistair Popple
2026-02-11 23:22     ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7juf5mznp2fzy6tt2rs7dsjqdyfglzjiwkavoaezq7766csdnd@irbgevj6jesk \
    --to=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox