From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1051BC25B76 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 77A3E6B008C; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:03:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 703456B0092; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:03:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 555806B0093; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:03:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358DB6B008C for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:03:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1ADF814B0 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:03:01 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82197152562.02.16B0A8E Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2662C40023 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QRoB3lSU; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1717599779; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=fwDVo7GjtekDVw1UT8ykjYvE/3C7wf3dPft4rLNt4u0=; b=10imeAtFOMXIRtXPXjsQXGGAMEuHs2WBRUtKghRRBBY/g3WIfYkztWj2huGLyik7UcAUFA AkvI45GxorJebr2hYMNoExQukLqB41LJJHyUcYBgWQsDL5DjxIBL2bq4nRsFN8CDdP01kQ 40Ge4Ij63c0B6+URelzEL3387150HCg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QRoB3lSU; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1717599779; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oANC6poItTeRDeYAOv/UHTfDP8SOiqYHhsx0ob1Frf7DxA7+bmg3nR++ryEgBvcSh7Gqk7 ufqxBSyWp8HphYf2Dx+yCKXjw02wi3JfuMvbOa8e0aq83MFPdFHmpPCJDKKFcZvqlOFho/ KFZIKnhFeZaPZA2dZFjg3ir9JVfUHOA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717599778; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=fwDVo7GjtekDVw1UT8ykjYvE/3C7wf3dPft4rLNt4u0=; b=QRoB3lSU1zWdTXycXCybYaPIaMw7hEpudAy/aFBdej/hMVB7vUr0L/8VkqtEjIzf2JlOHi dPn7qz5oEmqL8I9QHJvRjS55kFenZCQSmN8604xYkojRhsbOHHoaG7ODBe8eT71BbparwW qfeOELzddcELSUfQPHtoTaf8V4/4Dmc= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-518-li7ZTIeQM-W94naobhzTfw-1; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 11:02:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: li7ZTIeQM-W94naobhzTfw-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ea95d34474so18621451fa.3 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:02:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717599775; x=1718204575; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fwDVo7GjtekDVw1UT8ykjYvE/3C7wf3dPft4rLNt4u0=; b=rf6shQl9eSDO1X403UZKOLh2+TGhG8c5zsq+qCvwGvYM6Ncg/3FgtKdj60sqeAVTGh SumSrbsVMOd1jjNYoVHqX/FPmDuMlBbGkqZ5BNZyGAX6NtaueJIW1s4r1QNuyFJ2mngV oZ8kjrqvFgHYagutTedXOjuWp1ZvYdYiooW5qGOD2BCR5C+NPGFeBoR96MWysOjjxn+Y 2gNZon4qjeXA7wZYIRizJNwh0UzOvcNv90i2GAn6wpbYgB64Bf9/aQc40oWDef6eNLQz ohjco9gvaW/9jfcVIKMswSO6xE1XY+TeNCUsqNEQ++jCa286oW3F5yb2jAGhPiJZrTTL BUNQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVKB533uFQq5rVExKrbcKp4EHgzMpPofr4dJ+/RCf9rAsXbfteNblQUOtlei/hUORwJxUWS7wJoMviAQTIgioDcl6E= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyv170e9kVulPTnMit8w50zlKEpmH02OcGurz+J8vuVeosjVNWu xKArxqE/aWM+2ePQ+nAPzJvyV14Q0HTI0QWLi+57ECfq6TVtOYReT1g+wh0lfakPEP/a8UIoysN gYL5LHmYZgtFnDnBpFcqTjuJBfnDlQMqrdFjGh21cEJn2DAhe X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:211f:b0:2ea:7d2f:415d with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2eac798b840mr19216081fa.1.1717599775445; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:02:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFkGlIovqa57PBpI7fzDqOiTVx//DV1SJhMiNxqCMG7ZUk1FXn6awUyfOR/damTo58SsJm4w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:211f:b0:2ea:7d2f:415d with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2eac798b840mr19215731fa.1.1717599774848; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c706:3100:19a8:d898:8e69:6aff? (p200300cbc706310019a8d8988e696aff.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c706:3100:19a8:d898:8e69:6aff]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4215811d981sm24111095e9.25.2024.06.05.08.02.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7f2ab112-5916-422c-b29f-343cc0d6d754@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:02:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop To: Lance Yang Cc: Yin Fengwei , akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, maskray@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, zokeefe@google.com, shy828301@gmail.com, xiehuan09@gmail.com, libang.li@antgroup.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240521040244.48760-1-ioworker0@gmail.com> <20240521040244.48760-3-ioworker0@gmail.com> <8580a462-eadc-4fa5-b01a-c0b8c3ae644d@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2662C40023 X-Stat-Signature: yy4wjpgxb79t8nru3qfpqdjwx1yruxm7 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1717599778-751185 X-HE-Meta: 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 BY3HPzQ7 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 05.06.24 16:57, Lance Yang wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:39 PM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> On 05.06.24 16:28, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 05.06.24 16:20, Lance Yang wrote: >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 8:46 PM David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 21.05.24 06:02, Lance Yang wrote: >>>>>> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped >>>>>> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to >>>>>> split the folio. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD will no longer perform immediately, we might >>>>>> encounter a PMD-mapped THP missing the mlock in the VM_LOCKED range during >>>>>> the page walk. It’s probably necessary to mlock this THP to prevent it from >>>>>> being picked up during page reclaim. >>>>>> >>>>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand >>>>>> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang >>>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> [...] again, sorry for the late review. >>>> >>>> No worries at all, thanks for taking time to review! >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c >>>>>> index ddffa30c79fb..08a93347f283 100644 >>>>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c >>>>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c >>>>>> @@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma, >>>>>> if (flags & TTU_SYNC) >>>>>> pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC; >>>>>> >>>>>> - if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) >>>>>> - split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio); >>>>>> - >>>>>> /* >>>>>> * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation. >>>>>> * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud >>>>>> @@ -1668,20 +1665,35 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma, >>>>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); >>>>>> >>>>>> while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) { >>>>>> - /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */ >>>>>> - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio); >>>>>> - >>>>>> /* >>>>>> * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out. >>>>>> */ >>>>>> if (!(flags & TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK) && >>>>>> (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) { >>>>>> /* Restore the mlock which got missed */ >>>>>> - if (!folio_test_large(folio)) >>>>>> + if (!folio_test_large(folio) || >>>>>> + (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD))) >>>>>> mlock_vma_folio(folio, vma); >>>>> >>>>> Can you elaborate why you think this would be required? If we would have >>>>> performed the split_huge_pmd_address() beforehand, we would still be >>>>> left with a large folio, no? >>>> >>>> Yep, there would still be a large folio, but it wouldn't be PMD-mapped. >>>> >>>> After Weifeng's series[1], the kernel supports mlock for PTE-mapped large >>>> folio, but there are a few scenarios where we don't mlock a large folio, such >>>> as when it crosses a VM_LOCKed VMA boundary. >>>> >>>> - if (!folio_test_large(folio)) >>>> + if (!folio_test_large(folio) || >>>> + (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD))) >>>> >>>> And this check is just future-proofing and likely unnecessary. If encountering a >>>> PMD-mapped THP missing the mlock for some reason, we can mlock this >>>> THP to prevent it from being picked up during page reclaim, since it is fully >>>> mapped and doesn't cross the VMA boundary, IIUC. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> I would appreciate any suggestions regarding this check ;) >>> >>> Reading this patch only, I wonder if this change makes sense in the >>> context here. >>> >>> Before this patch, we would have PTE-mapped the PMD-mapped THP before >>> reaching this call and skipped it due to "!folio_test_large(folio)". >>> >>> After this patch, we either >>> >>> a) PTE-remap the THP after this check, but retry and end-up here again, >>> whereby we would skip it due to "!folio_test_large(folio)". >>> >>> b) Discard the PMD-mapped THP due to lazyfree directly. Can that >>> co-exist with mlock and what would be the problem here with mlock? >>> >>> > > Thanks a lot for clarifying! > >>> So if the check is required in this patch, we really have to understand >>> why. If not, we should better drop it from this patch. >>> >>> At least my opinion, still struggling to understand why it would be >>> required (I have 0 knowledge about mlock interaction with large folios :) ). >>> >> >> Looking at that series, in folio_references_one(), we do >> >> if (!folio_test_large(folio) || !pvmw.pte) { >> /* Restore the mlock which got missed */ >> mlock_vma_folio(folio, vma); >> page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw); >> pra->vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED; >> return false; /* To break the loop */ >> } >> >> I wonder if we want that here as well now: in case of lazyfree we >> would not back off, right? >> >> But I'm not sure if lazyfree in mlocked areas are even possible. >> >> Adding the "!pvmw.pte" would be much clearer to me than the flag check. > > Hmm... How about we drop it from this patch for now, and add it back if needed > in the future? If we can rule out that MADV_FREE + mlock() keeps working as expected in the PMD-mapped case, we're good. Can we rule that out? (especially for MADV_FREE followed by mlock()) -- Cheers, David / dhildenb