From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE0096B003D for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:07:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2D77bvC012283 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:07:37 +0900 Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7361645DE65 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:07:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350E945DE5D for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:07:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050651DB8049 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:07:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml11.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml11.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.101]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECCD1DB803E for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:07:36 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <7e852b228b80d8ba468a49bfb6551b6d.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <7c3bfaf94080838cb7c2f7c54959a9f1.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> References: <20090312175603.17890.52593.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <7c3bfaf94080838cb7c2f7c54959a9f1.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:07:35 +0900 (JST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Memory controller soft limit patches (v5) From: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Balbir Singh , linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton List-ID: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki さんは書きました： > Balbir Singh さんは書きました： >> >> From: Balbir Singh >> >> New Feature: Soft limits for memory resource controller. >> >> Changelog v5...v4 >> 1. Several changes to the reclaim logic, please see the patch 4 (reclaim >> on >> contention). I've experimented with several possibilities for reclaim >> and chose to come back to this due to the excellent behaviour seen >> while >> testing the patchset. >> 2. Reduced the overhead of soft limits on resource counters very >> significantly. >> Reaim benchmark now shows almost no drop in performance. >> > It seems there are no changes to answer my last comments. > > Nack again. I'll update my own version again. > Sigh, this is in -mm ? okay...I'll update onto -mm as much as I can. Very heavy work, maybe. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org