linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, nadav.amit@gmail.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	jackmanb@google.com, jannh@google.com, mhklinux@outlook.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Manali.Shukla@amd.com,
	mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 11/13] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:47:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e1ca8c7-6f3e-44dc-9dd8-bd273a03a83e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250303114618.GBZ8WWihMDjf-oy8P0@fat_crate.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10750 bytes --]

On 3/3/25 03:46, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:00:46PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> +static inline bool cpu_need_tlbsync(void)
>> +{
>> +	return this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void cpu_write_tlbsync(bool state)
> 
> That thing feels better like "cpu_set_tlbsync" in the code...
> 
>> +{
>> +	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync, state);
>> +}
>>  #else
>>  static inline u16 mm_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm)
>>  {
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static inline void tlbsync(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
>> +		return;
>> +	__tlbsync();
>> +	cpu_write_tlbsync(false);
>> +}
> 
> Easier to parse visually:
> 
> static inline void tlbsync(void)
> {
>         if (cpu_need_tlbsync()) {
>                 __tlbsync();
>                 cpu_write_tlbsync(false);
>         }
> }
> 
> Final:
> 
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:00:46 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code
> 
> Instead of doing a system-wide TLB flush from arch_tlbbatch_flush(), queue up
> asynchronous, targeted flushes from arch_tlbbatch_add_pending().
> 
> This also allows to avoid adding the CPUs of processes using broadcast
> flushing to the batch->cpumask, and will hopefully further reduce TLB flushing
> from the reclaim and compaction paths.
> 
>   [ bp:
>    - Massage
>    - :%s/\<static_cpu_has\>/cpu_feature_enabled/cgi ]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226030129.530345-12-riel@surriel.com
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h      | 12 ++---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 27 +++++++----
>  arch/x86/mm/tlb.c               | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> index 04f2c6f4cee3..b5c2005725cf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> @@ -102,16 +102,16 @@ static inline void __tlbsync(void) { }
>  #define INVLPGB_FINAL_ONLY		BIT(4)
>  #define INVLPGB_INCLUDE_NESTED		BIT(5)
>  
> -static inline void invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(unsigned long pcid,
> -						unsigned long addr,
> -						u16 nr,
> -						bool pmd_stride)
> +static inline void __invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(unsigned long pcid,
> +						  unsigned long addr,
> +						  u16 nr,
> +						  bool pmd_stride)
>  {
>  	__invlpgb(0, pcid, addr, nr, pmd_stride, INVLPGB_PCID | INVLPGB_VA);
>  }
>  
>  /* Flush all mappings for a given PCID, not including globals. */
> -static inline void invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(unsigned long pcid)
> +static inline void __invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(unsigned long pcid)
>  {
>  	__invlpgb(0, pcid, 0, 1, 0, INVLPGB_PCID);
>  }
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static inline void invlpgb_flush_all(void)
>  }
>  
>  /* Flush addr, including globals, for all PCIDs. */
> -static inline void invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(unsigned long addr, u16 nr)
> +static inline void __invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(unsigned long addr, u16 nr)
>  {
>  	__invlpgb(0, 0, addr, nr, 0, INVLPGB_INCLUDE_GLOBAL);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 8c21030269ff..cbdb86d58301 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ struct tlb_state {
>  	 * need to be invalidated.
>  	 */
>  	bool invalidate_other;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BROADCAST_TLB_FLUSH
> +	bool need_tlbsync;
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ADDRESS_MASKING
>  	/*
> @@ -292,11 +295,23 @@ static inline bool mm_in_asid_transition(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  
>  	return mm && READ_ONCE(mm->context.asid_transition);
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool cpu_need_tlbsync(void)
> +{
> +	return this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void cpu_set_tlbsync(bool state)
> +{
> +	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync, state);
> +}
>  #else
>  static inline u16 mm_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm) { return 0; }
>  static inline void mm_init_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm) { }
>  static inline void mm_assign_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm, u16 asid) { }
>  static inline bool mm_in_asid_transition(struct mm_struct *mm) { return false; }
> +static inline bool cpu_need_tlbsync(void) { return false; }
> +static inline void cpu_set_tlbsync(bool state) { }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_BROADCAST_TLB_FLUSH */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> @@ -346,21 +361,15 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	return atomic64_inc_return(&mm->context.tlb_gen);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
> -					     struct mm_struct *mm,
> -					     unsigned long uaddr)
> -{
> -	inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
> -	cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
> -	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
> -}
> -
>  static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	flush_tlb_mm(mm);
>  }
>  
>  extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch);
> +extern void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
> +					     struct mm_struct *mm,
> +					     unsigned long uaddr);
>  
>  static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
>  					unsigned long newflags,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> index 0efd99053c09..83ba6876adbf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -492,6 +492,37 @@ static void finish_asid_transition(struct flush_tlb_info *info)
>  	mm_clear_asid_transition(mm);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void tlbsync(void)
> +{
> +	if (cpu_need_tlbsync()) {
> +		__tlbsync();
> +		cpu_set_tlbsync(false);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(unsigned long pcid,
> +						unsigned long addr,
> +						u16 nr, bool pmd_stride)
> +{
> +	__invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(pcid, addr, nr, pmd_stride);
> +	if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
> +		cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(unsigned long pcid)
> +{
> +	__invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(pcid);
> +	if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
> +		cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(unsigned long addr, u16 nr)
> +{
> +	__invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(addr, nr);
> +	if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
> +		cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
> +}

One thought on these:

Instead of having three functions:

	1. A raw __invlpgb_*_nosync()
	2. A wrapper invlpgb_*_nosync() that flips cpu_set_tlbsync()
	3. A wrapper invlpgb_*()

Could we get away with just two?  For instance, what if we had *ALL*
__invlpgb()'s do cpu_set_tlbsync()? Then we'd universally call tlbsync().

static inline void invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals(void)
{
        guard(preempt)();
        __invlpgb(0, 0, 0, 1, NO_STRIDE, INVLPGB_MODE_ALL_NONGLOBALS);
        tlbsync();
}

Then we wouldn't need any of those three new wrappers. The only downside
is that we'd end up with paths that logically do:

	__invlpgb()
	cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
	if (cpu_need_tlbsync()) { // always true
		__tlbsync();
		cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
	}

In other words, a possibly superfluous set/check/clear of the
"need_tlbsync" state. But I'd expect that to be a pittance compared to
the actual cost of INVLPGB/TLBSYNC.

>  static void broadcast_tlb_flush(struct flush_tlb_info *info)
>  {
>  	bool pmd = info->stride_shift == PMD_SHIFT;
> @@ -790,6 +821,8 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
>  
> +	tlbsync();

This one is in dire need of comments.

>  	/*
>  	 * Verify that CR3 is what we think it is.  This will catch
>  	 * hypothetical buggy code that directly switches to swapper_pg_dir
> @@ -966,6 +999,8 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
>   */
>  void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> +	tlbsync();

Ditto, *especially* if this hits the init_mm state. There really
shouldn't be any deferred flushes for the init_mm.

>  	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -1633,9 +1668,7 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
>  	 * a local TLB flush is needed. Optimize this use-case by calling
>  	 * flush_tlb_func_local() directly in this case.
>  	 */
> -	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) {
> -		invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals();
> -	} else if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
> +	if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
>  		flush_tlb_multi(&batch->cpumask, info);
>  	} else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
>  		lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
> @@ -1644,12 +1677,52 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
>  		local_irq_enable();
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes were issued, wait for them here.
> +	 * The cpumask above contains only CPUs that were running tasks
> +	 * not using broadcast TLB flushing.
> +	 */
> +	tlbsync();

I have a suggested comment in the attached fixups. This makes it sound
like tasks are either INVLPGB *or* in ->cpumask. Transitioning mms can
be both, I think.

>  	cpumask_clear(&batch->cpumask);
>  
>  	put_flush_tlb_info();
>  	put_cpu();
>  }
>  
> +void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
> +					     struct mm_struct *mm,
> +					     unsigned long uaddr)
> +{
> +	u16 asid = mm_global_asid(mm);
> +
> +	if (asid) {
> +		invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
> +		/* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */
> +		if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
> +			invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(user_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Some CPUs might still be using a local ASID for this
> +		 * process, and require IPIs, while others are using the
> +		 * global ASID.
> +		 *
> +		 * In this corner case, both broadcast TLB invalidation
> +		 * and IPIs need to be sent. The IPIs will help
> +		 * stragglers transition to the broadcast ASID.
> +		 */
> +		if (mm_in_asid_transition(mm))
> +			asid = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!asid) {
> +		inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
> +		cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
> +	}
> +
> +	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
> +}

I stuck some better comments in the patch. I think this should both
mention that a later tlbsync() is required and *also* match teh two
cases better.

Also, the "if (asid)" isn't super nice naming. Let's please call it
"global_asid" because it's either a global ASID or 0.

[-- Attachment #2: tlbbatch.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1955 bytes --]

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 8e596de963a8f..8e1ac8be123b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -821,6 +821,9 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
 
+	// FIXME
+	// This is totally unexplained and needs justification and
+	// commenting
 	tlbsync();
 
 	/*
@@ -1678,9 +1681,10 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * If (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes were issued, wait for them here.
-	 * The cpumask above contains only CPUs that were running tasks
-	 * not using broadcast TLB flushing.
+	 * Wait for outstanding INVLPGB flushes. batch->cpumask will
+	 * be empty when the batch was handled completely by INVLPGB.
+	 * Note that mm_in_asid_transition() mm's may use INVLPGB and
+	 * the flush_tlb_multi() IPIs at the same time.
 	 */
 	tlbsync();
 
@@ -1693,9 +1697,14 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
 			       struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long uaddr)
 {
-	u16 asid = mm_global_asid(mm);
+	u16 global_asid = mm_global_asid(mm);
 
-	if (asid) {
+	if (global_asid) {
+		/*
+		 * Global ASIDs can be flushed with INVLPGB. Flush
+		 * now instead of batching them for later. A later
+		 * tlbsync() is required to ensure these completed.
+		 */
 		invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
 		/* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */
 		if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
@@ -1714,7 +1723,11 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
 			asid = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!asid) {
+	if (!global_asid) {
+		/*
+		 * Mark the mm and the CPU so that
+		 * the TLB gets flushed later.
+		 */
 		inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
 		cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-03 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26  3:00 [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 01/13] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 15:44   ` [BUG] x86/mm: regression after 4a02ed8e1cc3 Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-09-02 15:50     ` Dave Hansen
2025-09-02 16:08       ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-02 16:11         ` Dave Hansen
2025-09-03 14:00       ` Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 16:05     ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:13       ` Jann Horn
2025-09-03 14:18       ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-03 14:42         ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:31     ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:57       ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 02/13] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 16:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 19:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 03/13] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 18:51   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 19:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 18:41     ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-03 19:23       ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:00         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:10           ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 16:19             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 16:57               ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 21:12                 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 04/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:00   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 21:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 05/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:18   ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-01 12:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-01 15:54       ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 22:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 06/13] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 07/13] x86/mm: add global ASID allocation helper functions Rik van Riel
2025-03-02  7:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 08/13] x86/mm: global ASID context switch & TLB flush handling Rik van Riel
2025-03-02  7:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 09/13] x86/mm: global ASID process exit helpers Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 12:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-02 13:53     ` Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:16       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 10/13] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 11/13] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 11:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 21:47     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-03-04 11:52       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:24         ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 12:52       ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 14:11         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:33           ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 17:51             ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 12/13] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 13/13] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 22:40   ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 12:42 ` [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 13:29   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:04 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Always set the ASID valid bit for the INVLPGB instruction Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:43   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e1ca8c7-6f3e-44dc-9dd8-bd273a03a83e@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox