From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, nadav.amit@gmail.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
jackmanb@google.com, jannh@google.com, mhklinux@outlook.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Manali.Shukla@amd.com,
mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 11/13] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:47:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e1ca8c7-6f3e-44dc-9dd8-bd273a03a83e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250303114618.GBZ8WWihMDjf-oy8P0@fat_crate.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10750 bytes --]
On 3/3/25 03:46, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:00:46PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> +static inline bool cpu_need_tlbsync(void)
>> +{
>> + return this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void cpu_write_tlbsync(bool state)
>
> That thing feels better like "cpu_set_tlbsync" in the code...
>
>> +{
>> + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync, state);
>> +}
>> #else
>> static inline u16 mm_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm)
>> {
>
> ...
>
>> +static inline void tlbsync(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
>> + return;
>> + __tlbsync();
>> + cpu_write_tlbsync(false);
>> +}
>
> Easier to parse visually:
>
> static inline void tlbsync(void)
> {
> if (cpu_need_tlbsync()) {
> __tlbsync();
> cpu_write_tlbsync(false);
> }
> }
>
> Final:
>
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:00:46 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code
>
> Instead of doing a system-wide TLB flush from arch_tlbbatch_flush(), queue up
> asynchronous, targeted flushes from arch_tlbbatch_add_pending().
>
> This also allows to avoid adding the CPUs of processes using broadcast
> flushing to the batch->cpumask, and will hopefully further reduce TLB flushing
> from the reclaim and compaction paths.
>
> [ bp:
> - Massage
> - :%s/\<static_cpu_has\>/cpu_feature_enabled/cgi ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226030129.530345-12-riel@surriel.com
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h | 12 ++---
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 27 +++++++----
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> index 04f2c6f4cee3..b5c2005725cf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
> @@ -102,16 +102,16 @@ static inline void __tlbsync(void) { }
> #define INVLPGB_FINAL_ONLY BIT(4)
> #define INVLPGB_INCLUDE_NESTED BIT(5)
>
> -static inline void invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(unsigned long pcid,
> - unsigned long addr,
> - u16 nr,
> - bool pmd_stride)
> +static inline void __invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(unsigned long pcid,
> + unsigned long addr,
> + u16 nr,
> + bool pmd_stride)
> {
> __invlpgb(0, pcid, addr, nr, pmd_stride, INVLPGB_PCID | INVLPGB_VA);
> }
>
> /* Flush all mappings for a given PCID, not including globals. */
> -static inline void invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(unsigned long pcid)
> +static inline void __invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(unsigned long pcid)
> {
> __invlpgb(0, pcid, 0, 1, 0, INVLPGB_PCID);
> }
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static inline void invlpgb_flush_all(void)
> }
>
> /* Flush addr, including globals, for all PCIDs. */
> -static inline void invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(unsigned long addr, u16 nr)
> +static inline void __invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(unsigned long addr, u16 nr)
> {
> __invlpgb(0, 0, addr, nr, 0, INVLPGB_INCLUDE_GLOBAL);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 8c21030269ff..cbdb86d58301 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ struct tlb_state {
> * need to be invalidated.
> */
> bool invalidate_other;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BROADCAST_TLB_FLUSH
> + bool need_tlbsync;
> +#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ADDRESS_MASKING
> /*
> @@ -292,11 +295,23 @@ static inline bool mm_in_asid_transition(struct mm_struct *mm)
>
> return mm && READ_ONCE(mm->context.asid_transition);
> }
> +
> +static inline bool cpu_need_tlbsync(void)
> +{
> + return this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void cpu_set_tlbsync(bool state)
> +{
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.need_tlbsync, state);
> +}
> #else
> static inline u16 mm_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm) { return 0; }
> static inline void mm_init_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm) { }
> static inline void mm_assign_global_asid(struct mm_struct *mm, u16 asid) { }
> static inline bool mm_in_asid_transition(struct mm_struct *mm) { return false; }
> +static inline bool cpu_need_tlbsync(void) { return false; }
> +static inline void cpu_set_tlbsync(bool state) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_BROADCAST_TLB_FLUSH */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> @@ -346,21 +361,15 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm)
> return atomic64_inc_return(&mm->context.tlb_gen);
> }
>
> -static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
> - struct mm_struct *mm,
> - unsigned long uaddr)
> -{
> - inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
> - cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
> - mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
> -}
> -
> static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> }
>
> extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch);
> +extern void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
> + struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long uaddr);
>
> static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
> unsigned long newflags,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> index 0efd99053c09..83ba6876adbf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -492,6 +492,37 @@ static void finish_asid_transition(struct flush_tlb_info *info)
> mm_clear_asid_transition(mm);
> }
>
> +static inline void tlbsync(void)
> +{
> + if (cpu_need_tlbsync()) {
> + __tlbsync();
> + cpu_set_tlbsync(false);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(unsigned long pcid,
> + unsigned long addr,
> + u16 nr, bool pmd_stride)
> +{
> + __invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(pcid, addr, nr, pmd_stride);
> + if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
> + cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(unsigned long pcid)
> +{
> + __invlpgb_flush_single_pcid_nosync(pcid);
> + if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
> + cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(unsigned long addr, u16 nr)
> +{
> + __invlpgb_flush_addr_nosync(addr, nr);
> + if (!cpu_need_tlbsync())
> + cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
> +}
One thought on these:
Instead of having three functions:
1. A raw __invlpgb_*_nosync()
2. A wrapper invlpgb_*_nosync() that flips cpu_set_tlbsync()
3. A wrapper invlpgb_*()
Could we get away with just two? For instance, what if we had *ALL*
__invlpgb()'s do cpu_set_tlbsync()? Then we'd universally call tlbsync().
static inline void invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals(void)
{
guard(preempt)();
__invlpgb(0, 0, 0, 1, NO_STRIDE, INVLPGB_MODE_ALL_NONGLOBALS);
tlbsync();
}
Then we wouldn't need any of those three new wrappers. The only downside
is that we'd end up with paths that logically do:
__invlpgb()
cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
if (cpu_need_tlbsync()) { // always true
__tlbsync();
cpu_set_tlbsync(true);
}
In other words, a possibly superfluous set/check/clear of the
"need_tlbsync" state. But I'd expect that to be a pittance compared to
the actual cost of INVLPGB/TLBSYNC.
> static void broadcast_tlb_flush(struct flush_tlb_info *info)
> {
> bool pmd = info->stride_shift == PMD_SHIFT;
> @@ -790,6 +821,8 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
>
> + tlbsync();
This one is in dire need of comments.
> /*
> * Verify that CR3 is what we think it is. This will catch
> * hypothetical buggy code that directly switches to swapper_pg_dir
> @@ -966,6 +999,8 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
> */
> void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> + tlbsync();
Ditto, *especially* if this hits the init_mm state. There really
shouldn't be any deferred flushes for the init_mm.
> if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
> return;
>
> @@ -1633,9 +1668,7 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
> * a local TLB flush is needed. Optimize this use-case by calling
> * flush_tlb_func_local() directly in this case.
> */
> - if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) {
> - invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals();
> - } else if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
> + if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
> flush_tlb_multi(&batch->cpumask, info);
> } else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
> lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
> @@ -1644,12 +1677,52 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
> local_irq_enable();
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes were issued, wait for them here.
> + * The cpumask above contains only CPUs that were running tasks
> + * not using broadcast TLB flushing.
> + */
> + tlbsync();
I have a suggested comment in the attached fixups. This makes it sound
like tasks are either INVLPGB *or* in ->cpumask. Transitioning mms can
be both, I think.
> cpumask_clear(&batch->cpumask);
>
> put_flush_tlb_info();
> put_cpu();
> }
>
> +void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
> + struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long uaddr)
> +{
> + u16 asid = mm_global_asid(mm);
> +
> + if (asid) {
> + invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
> + /* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
> + invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(user_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
> +
> + /*
> + * Some CPUs might still be using a local ASID for this
> + * process, and require IPIs, while others are using the
> + * global ASID.
> + *
> + * In this corner case, both broadcast TLB invalidation
> + * and IPIs need to be sent. The IPIs will help
> + * stragglers transition to the broadcast ASID.
> + */
> + if (mm_in_asid_transition(mm))
> + asid = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (!asid) {
> + inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
> + cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
> + }
> +
> + mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
> +}
I stuck some better comments in the patch. I think this should both
mention that a later tlbsync() is required and *also* match teh two
cases better.
Also, the "if (asid)" isn't super nice naming. Let's please call it
"global_asid" because it's either a global ASID or 0.
[-- Attachment #2: tlbbatch.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1955 bytes --]
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 8e596de963a8f..8e1ac8be123b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -821,6 +821,9 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *unused, struct mm_struct *next,
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
+ // FIXME
+ // This is totally unexplained and needs justification and
+ // commenting
tlbsync();
/*
@@ -1678,9 +1681,10 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
}
/*
- * If (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes were issued, wait for them here.
- * The cpumask above contains only CPUs that were running tasks
- * not using broadcast TLB flushing.
+ * Wait for outstanding INVLPGB flushes. batch->cpumask will
+ * be empty when the batch was handled completely by INVLPGB.
+ * Note that mm_in_asid_transition() mm's may use INVLPGB and
+ * the flush_tlb_multi() IPIs at the same time.
*/
tlbsync();
@@ -1693,9 +1697,14 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long uaddr)
{
- u16 asid = mm_global_asid(mm);
+ u16 global_asid = mm_global_asid(mm);
- if (asid) {
+ if (global_asid) {
+ /*
+ * Global ASIDs can be flushed with INVLPGB. Flush
+ * now instead of batching them for later. A later
+ * tlbsync() is required to ensure these completed.
+ */
invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false);
/* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
@@ -1714,7 +1723,11 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
asid = 0;
}
- if (!asid) {
+ if (!global_asid) {
+ /*
+ * Mark the mm and the CPU so that
+ * the TLB gets flushed later.
+ */
inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 3:00 [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 01/13] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 15:44 ` [BUG] x86/mm: regression after 4a02ed8e1cc3 Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-09-02 15:50 ` Dave Hansen
2025-09-02 16:08 ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-02 16:11 ` Dave Hansen
2025-09-03 14:00 ` Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 16:05 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:13 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-03 14:18 ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-03 14:42 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:31 ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:57 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 02/13] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 16:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 19:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 03/13] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 18:51 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 19:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 18:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-03 19:23 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:10 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 16:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 16:57 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 21:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 04/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:00 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 21:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 05/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:18 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-01 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-01 15:54 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 22:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 06/13] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 07/13] x86/mm: add global ASID allocation helper functions Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 7:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 08/13] x86/mm: global ASID context switch & TLB flush handling Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 7:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 09/13] x86/mm: global ASID process exit helpers Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-02 13:53 ` Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 10/13] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 11/13] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 11:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 21:47 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-03-04 11:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:24 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 12:52 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 14:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:33 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 17:51 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 12/13] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-02-26 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 13/13] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 22:40 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 12:42 ` [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 13:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:04 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Always set the ASID valid bit for the INVLPGB instruction Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:43 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e1ca8c7-6f3e-44dc-9dd8-bd273a03a83e@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox