From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2CCC433E0 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA8322BF3 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:25:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ECA8322BF3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 51B146B00D8; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:25:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4C9CB6B00DA; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:25:17 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3A99B6B00DB; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:25:17 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0204.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.204]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7FA6B00D8 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:25:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEAE1EF1 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:25:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77694623832.30.drum93_3807ea12750f Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3F7180B3AA7 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:25:16 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: drum93_3807ea12750f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4949 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by imf47.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:25:14 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: vQGM362aJf34GhwKFEboIodyrG1R0C5ura4e00oQBrV1yXrOYhdSRWRN76b7tmXoT1PV/9zywy TH3zo97k9HuA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9861"; a="175351569" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,339,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="175351569" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2021 12:25:11 -0800 IronPort-SDR: Dt8C4gv/BTd8wW9R3c0fF+bFblte/UVcjVFn9jevBPFF9vCHgBDoyYuJW9Fvs8g1H3zg3J60s1 RQhA4mW+8QVA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,339,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="352739979" Received: from yyu32-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.197.241]) ([10.212.197.241]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2021 12:25:08 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 04/26] x86/cpufeatures: Introduce X86_FEATURE_CET and setup functions To: Borislav Petkov Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu References: <20201229213053.16395-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20201229213053.16395-5-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210111175643.GD25645@zn.tnic> From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" Message-ID: <7def977d-ce6b-e9b4-ea4a-467a9d652147@intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:25:07 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210111175643.GD25645@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 1/11/2021 9:56 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 01:30:31PM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: >> @@ -895,6 +903,12 @@ static void init_speculation_control(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) >> } >> } >> >> +static void init_cet_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) >> +{ >> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IBT)) >> + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CET); >> +} > > No need for that function - just add this two-liner to bsp_init_intel() > and not in get_cpu_cap(). > I will move these to bsp_init_intel(), and change to: if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IBT)) setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CET); >> +static void adjust_combined_cpu_features(void) >> +{ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET_USER >> + if (test_bit(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared) && >> + test_bit(X86_FEATURE_IBT, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared)) >> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CET); >> +#endif > > There's no need for this function... > >> +} >> + >> /* >> * We parse cpu parameters early because fpu__init_system() is executed >> * before parse_early_param(). >> @@ -1252,9 +1276,19 @@ static void __init cpu_parse_early_param(void) >> if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line, "noxsaves")) >> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES); >> >> + /* >> + * CET states are XSAVES states and options must be parsed early. >> + */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET_USER >> + if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line, "no_user_shstk")) >> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK); > > ... when you can do > > setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CET); > > here and... > >> + if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line, "no_user_ibt")) >> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBT); > > ... here. > Two problems here. X86_FEATURE_CET indicates either CET features is enabled, not both. Also, "clearcpuid" can has CET features. However, since X86_FEATURE_CET is now set in bsp_init_intel() (after cpu_parse_early_params()), I think, adjust_combined_cpu_features() can be removed. I will test it. -- Thanks, Yu-cheng