From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: cl@gentwo.org, rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, glittao@gmail.com, jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/slub: Replace sort_r() with sort() for debugfs stack trace sorting
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 19:31:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cfb3108-342b-41b7-b4fe-b01a574dbdf0@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825013419.240278-3-visitorckw@gmail.com>
On 8/25/25 03:34, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> The comparison function used to sort stack trace locations in debugfs
> never relied on the third argument. Therefore, sort_r() is unnecessary.
> Switch to sort() with a two-argument comparison function to keep the
> code simple and aligned with the intended usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
LGTM.
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index c91b3744adbc..67b68f132f84 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -7711,7 +7711,7 @@ static void *slab_debugfs_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *ppos)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static int cmp_loc_by_count(const void *a, const void *b, const void *data)
> +static int cmp_loc_by_count(const void *a, const void *b)
> {
> struct location *loc1 = (struct location *)a;
> struct location *loc2 = (struct location *)b;
> @@ -7782,8 +7782,8 @@ static int slab_debug_trace_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> }
>
> /* Sort locations by count */
> - sort_r(t->loc, t->count, sizeof(struct location),
> - cmp_loc_by_count, NULL, NULL);
> + sort(t->loc, t->count, sizeof(struct location),
> + cmp_loc_by_count, NULL);
>
> bitmap_free(obj_map);
> return 0;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-25 1:34 [PATCH 0/2] mm/slub: Fix debugfs stack trace sorting and simplify sort call Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-25 1:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/slub: Fix cmp_loc_by_count() to return 0 when counts are equal Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-25 14:48 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-08-25 16:18 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-25 17:12 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-08-25 17:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-25 17:54 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-26 7:53 ` Harry Yoo
2025-08-28 17:13 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-29 2:06 ` Harry Yoo
2025-08-25 1:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/slub: Replace sort_r() with sort() for debugfs stack trace sorting Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-25 17:31 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7cfb3108-342b-41b7-b4fe-b01a574dbdf0@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=glittao@gmail.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox