From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: l.roehrs@profihost.ag,
Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG <d.aberger@profihost.ag>,
"n.fahldieck@profihost.ag" <n.fahldieck@profihost.ag>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: debug linux kernel memory management / pressure
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 08:42:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cc0592c-228b-6e4b-0410-552ea5e08329@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b0cd84c-b5e5-033c-3bae-e108b038209b@suse.cz>
Hi Vlastimil,
sorry for the late reply i was on holiday.
Am 05.04.19 um 12:37 schrieb Vlastimil Babka:
> On 3/29/19 10:41 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> nobody an idea? I had another system today:
>
> Well, isn't it still the same thing as we discussed in last autumn?
> You did report success with the ill-fated patch "mm: thp: relax __GFP_THISNODE
> for MADV_HUGEPAGE mappings", or not?
No it's not. Last year those were KVM Host machines. These time it's a
LAMP machine. But i think i'll upgrade to 4.19.36 LTS and see if that
fixes the problem.
Thanks!
>
>> # cat /proc/meminfo
>> MemTotal: 131911684 kB
>> MemFree: 25734836 kB
>> MemAvailable: 78158816 kB
>> Buffers: 2916 kB
>> Cached: 20650184 kB
>> SwapCached: 544016 kB
>> Active: 58999352 kB
>> Inactive: 10084060 kB
>> Active(anon): 43412532 kB
>> Inactive(anon): 5583220 kB
>> Active(file): 15586820 kB
>> Inactive(file): 4500840 kB
>> Unevictable: 35032 kB
>> Mlocked: 35032 kB
>> SwapTotal: 3905532 kB
>> SwapFree: 0 kB
>> Dirty: 1048 kB
>> Writeback: 20144 kB
>> AnonPages: 47923392 kB
>> Mapped: 775376 kB
>> Shmem: 561420 kB
>> Slab: 35798052 kB
>> SReclaimable: 34309112 kB
>
> That's rather significant. Got a /proc/slabinfo from such system state?
>
>> SUnreclaim: 1488940 kB
>> KernelStack: 42160 kB
>> PageTables: 248008 kB
>> NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
>> Bounce: 0 kB
>> WritebackTmp: 0 kB
>> CommitLimit: 69861372 kB
>> Committed_AS: 100328892 kB
>> VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
>> VmallocUsed: 0 kB
>> VmallocChunk: 0 kB
>> HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
>> AnonHugePages: 19177472 kB
>> ShmemHugePages: 0 kB
>> ShmemPmdMapped: 0 kB
>> HugePages_Total: 0
>> HugePages_Free: 0
>> HugePages_Rsvd: 0
>> HugePages_Surp: 0
>> Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
>> DirectMap4k: 951376 kB
>> DirectMap2M: 87015424 kB
>> DirectMap1G: 48234496 kB
>>
>> # cat /proc/buddyinfo
>> Node 0, zone DMA 1 0 0 0 2 1 1
>> 0 1 1 3
>> Node 0, zone DMA32 372 418 403 395 371 322 262
>> 179 114 0 0
>> Node 0, zone Normal 89147 96397 76496 56407 41671 29289 18142
>> 10278 4075 0 0
>> Node 1, zone Normal 113266 0 1 1 1 1 1
>> 1 1 0 0
>
> Node 1 seems quite fragmented. Again from last year I recall somebody (was it
> you?) capturing a larger series of snapshots where we saw a Sreclaimable rise
> due to some overnight 'find /' activity inflating dentry/inode caches which then
> got slowly reclaimed, but memory remained fragmented until enough of slab was
> reclaimed, and compaction couldn't help. drop_caches did help. Looks like this
> might be the same case. Add in something that tries to get large-order
> allocations on node 1 (e.g. with __GFP_THISNODE) and overreclaim will happen.
>
>> But with high PSI / memory pressure values above 10-30.
>>
>> Greets,
>> Stefan
>> Am 27.03.19 um 11:56 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> i hope this is the right place to ask. If not i would be happy to point
>>> me to something else.
>>>
>>> I'm seeing the following behaviour on some of our hosts running a SLES
>>> 15 kernel (kernel v4.12 as it's base) but i don't think it's related to
>>> the kernel.
>>>
>>> At some "random" interval - mostly 3-6 weeks of uptime. Suddenly mem
>>> pressure rises and the linux cache (Cached: /proc/meminfo) drops from
>>> 12G to 3G. After that io pressure rises most probably due to low cache.
>>> But at the same time i've MemFree und MemAvailable at 19-22G.
>>>
>>> Why does this happen? How can i debug this situation? I would expect
>>> that the page / file cache never drops if there is so much free mem.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your help.
>>>
>>> Greets,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> Not sure whether needed but these are the vm. kernel settings:
>>> vm.admin_reserve_kbytes = 8192
>>> vm.block_dump = 0
>>> vm.compact_unevictable_allowed = 1
>>> vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
>>> vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
>>> vm.dirty_bytes = 0
>>> vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
>>> vm.dirty_ratio = 20
>>> vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
>>> vm.dirtytime_expire_seconds = 43200
>>> vm.drop_caches = 0
>>> vm.extfrag_threshold = 500
>>> vm.hugepages_treat_as_movable = 0
>>> vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0
>>> vm.laptop_mode = 0
>>> vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
>>> vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio = 256 256 32 1
>>> vm.max_map_count = 65530
>>> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 0
>>> vm.memory_failure_recovery = 1
>>> vm.min_free_kbytes = 393216
>>> vm.min_slab_ratio = 5
>>> vm.min_unmapped_ratio = 1
>>> vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536
>>> vm.mmap_rnd_bits = 28
>>> vm.mmap_rnd_compat_bits = 8
>>> vm.nr_hugepages = 0
>>> vm.nr_hugepages_mempolicy = 0
>>> vm.nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0
>>> vm.nr_pdflush_threads = 0
>>> vm.numa_zonelist_order = default
>>> vm.oom_dump_tasks = 1
>>> vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
>>> vm.overcommit_kbytes = 0
>>> vm.overcommit_memory = 0
>>> vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
>>> vm.page-cluster = 3
>>> vm.panic_on_oom = 0
>>> vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction = 0
>>> vm.stat_interval = 1
>>> vm.swappiness = 50
>>> vm.user_reserve_kbytes = 131072
>>> vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 100
>>> vm.watermark_scale_factor = 10
>>> vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0
>>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-23 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-27 10:56 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-03-29 9:41 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2019-04-05 10:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-23 6:42 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7cc0592c-228b-6e4b-0410-552ea5e08329@profihost.ag \
--to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=d.aberger@profihost.ag \
--cc=l.roehrs@profihost.ag \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=n.fahldieck@profihost.ag \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox