From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C77C76B003D for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:02:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2D72OR6001886 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:02:24 +0900 Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B33F45DD7D for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:02:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6806045DD7B for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:02:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FED21DB8043 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:02:24 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml10.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml10.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.100]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C89BE08002 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:02:21 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <7c3bfaf94080838cb7c2f7c54959a9f1.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090312175603.17890.52593.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090312175603.17890.52593.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:02:20 +0900 (JST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Memory controller soft limit patches (v5) From: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Balbir Singh Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: Balbir Singh さんは書きました： > > From: Balbir Singh > > New Feature: Soft limits for memory resource controller. > > Changelog v5...v4 > 1. Several changes to the reclaim logic, please see the patch 4 (reclaim > on > contention). I've experimented with several possibilities for reclaim > and chose to come back to this due to the excellent behaviour seen > while > testing the patchset. > 2. Reduced the overhead of soft limits on resource counters very > significantly. > Reaim benchmark now shows almost no drop in performance. > It seems there are no changes to answer my last comments. Nack again. I'll update my own version again. Thanks, -Kame -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org