linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	guro@fb.com, shakeelb@google.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5 PATCH 08/11] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:59:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c0152a2-f846-c696-4dec-63f285d20ae5@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcb536e1-6808-5926-6688-89b98cfae7ad@virtuozzo.com>

On 29.01.2021 17:55, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 28.01.2021 02:33, Yang Shi wrote:
>> Use per memcg's nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers.  The shrinker's nr_deferred
>> will be used in the following cases:
>>     1. Non memcg aware shrinkers
>>     2. !CONFIG_MEMCG
>>     3. memcg is disabled by boot parameter
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/vmscan.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 20be0db291fe..e1f8960f5cf6 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>>  
>>  	for_each_node(nid) {
>>  		old = rcu_dereference_protected(
>> -			mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid)->shrinker_info, true);
>> +			mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid)->shrinker_info,
>> +			lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
> 
> Won't it better to pack this repeating pattern into helper function, e.g.:
> 
> static struct shrinker_info memcg_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
> {
> 	return rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
>                                          lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
> }
> 
> ?
> 
> Even shrink_slab_memcg() may want to use it.

Hm, I see you already introduced a helper in [10/11], but it is used in only place.
Then, we should use it for all places (introduce the helper earlier).
 
>>  		/* Not yet online memcg */
>>  		if (!old)
>>  			return 0;
>> @@ -239,7 +240,8 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>  
>>  	for_each_node(nid) {
>>  		pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
>> -		info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
>> +		info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info,
>> +						 lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
>>  		if (info)
>>  			kvfree(info);
>>  		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL);
>> @@ -360,6 +362,27 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>>  	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
>> +				    struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +	struct shrinker_info *info;
>> +
>> +	info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
>> +					 lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
>> +	return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
>> +				  struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +	struct shrinker_info *info;
>> +
>> +	info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
>> +					 lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
>> +
>> +	return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>>  {
>>  	return sc->target_mem_cgroup;
>> @@ -398,6 +421,18 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>>  {
>>  }
>>  
>> +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
>> +				    struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
>> +				  struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>>  {
>>  	return false;
>> @@ -409,6 +444,39 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +static long count_nr_deferred(struct shrinker *shrinker,
>> +			      struct shrink_control *sc)
>> +{
>> +	int nid = sc->nid;
>> +
>> +	if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
>> +		nid = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (sc->memcg &&
>> +	    (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
>> +		return count_nr_deferred_memcg(nid, shrinker,
>> +					       sc->memcg);
>> +
>> +	return atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static long set_nr_deferred(long nr, struct shrinker *shrinker,
>> +			    struct shrink_control *sc)
>> +{
>> +	int nid = sc->nid;
>> +
>> +	if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
>> +		nid = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (sc->memcg &&
>> +	    (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
>> +		return set_nr_deferred_memcg(nr, nid, shrinker,
>> +					     sc->memcg);
>> +
>> +	return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters.
>>   * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is
>> @@ -545,14 +613,10 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>>  	long freeable;
>>  	long nr;
>>  	long new_nr;
>> -	int nid = shrinkctl->nid;
>>  	long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
>>  					  : SHRINK_BATCH;
>>  	long scanned = 0, next_deferred;
>>  
>> -	if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
>> -		nid = 0;
>> -
>>  	freeable = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
>>  	if (freeable == 0 || freeable == SHRINK_EMPTY)
>>  		return freeable;
>> @@ -562,7 +626,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>>  	 * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations
>>  	 * don't also do this scanning work.
>>  	 */
>> -	nr = atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0);
>> +	nr = count_nr_deferred(shrinker, shrinkctl);
>>  
>>  	total_scan = nr;
>>  	if (shrinker->seeks) {
>> @@ -653,14 +717,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>>  		next_deferred = 0;
>>  	/*
>>  	 * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a
>> -	 * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the
>> -	 * scan, there is no need to do an update.
>> +	 * manner that handles concurrent updates.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (next_deferred > 0)
>> -		new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred,
>> -						&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
>> -	else
>> -		new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
>> +	new_nr = set_nr_deferred(next_deferred, shrinker, shrinkctl);
>>  
>>  	trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrinkctl->nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan);
>>  	return freed;
>>
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-27 23:33 [v5 PATCH 0/11] Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 01/11] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint Yang Shi
2021-01-28 16:02   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 02/11] mm: vmscan: consolidate shrinker_maps handling code Yang Shi
2021-01-28 16:10   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-28 21:16     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-29 14:33   ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-01-29 17:11     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 03/11] mm: vmscan: use shrinker_rwsem to protect shrinker_maps allocation Yang Shi
2021-01-28 16:19   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 04/11] mm: vmscan: remove memcg_shrinker_map_size Yang Shi
2021-01-28 16:53   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-28 21:22     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-29 11:22       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-29 17:05         ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 05/11] mm: memcontrol: rename shrinker_map to shrinker_info Yang Shi
2021-01-28 17:38   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-28 22:05     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 06/11] mm: vmscan: use a new flag to indicate shrinker is registered Yang Shi
2021-01-28 17:56   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-28 23:47     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 07/11] mm: vmscan: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred Yang Shi
2021-01-29 13:00   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-29 14:46     ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-01-29 17:20     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-29 18:04       ` Yang Shi
2021-02-01 15:17         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-01 17:09           ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 08/11] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker Yang Shi
2021-01-29 14:55   ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-01-29 14:59     ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2021-01-29 17:22       ` Yang Shi
2021-01-29 15:13   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-29 17:33     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 09/11] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers Yang Shi
2021-01-29 15:40   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-29 17:34     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 10/11] mm: memcontrol: reparent nr_deferred when memcg offline Yang Shi
2021-01-29 15:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-01-29 17:38     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-27 23:33 ` [v5 PATCH 11/11] mm: vmscan: shrink deferred objects proportional to priority Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7c0152a2-f846-c696-4dec-63f285d20ae5@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox