From: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ying.huang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
yuzhao@google.com, wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/vmscan.c: avoid possible long latency caused by too_many_isolated()
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:36:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b7a1c09-3d16-e199-15d2-ccea906d4a66@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416023536.168632-1-zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4255 bytes --]
Hi,
In the system with very few file pages (nr_active_file +
nr_inactive_file < 100), it is easy to reproduce "nr_isolated_file >
nr_inactive_file", then too_many_isolated return true,
shrink_inactive_list enter "msleep(100)", the long latency will happen.
The test case to reproduce it is very simple: allocate many huge
pages(near the DRAM size), then do free, repeat the same operation many
times.
In the test case, the system with very few file pages (nr_active_file +
nr_inactive_file < 100), I have dumpped the numbers of
active/inactive/isolated file pages during the whole test(see in the
attachments) , in shrink_inactive_list "too_many_isolated" is very easy
to return true, then enter "msleep(100)",in "too_many_isolated"
sc->gfp_mask is 0x342cca ("_GFP_IO" and "__GFP_FS" is masked) , it is
also very easy to enter “inactive >>=3”, then “isolated > inactive” will
be true.
So I have a proposal to set a threshold number for the total file pages
to ignore the system with very few file pages, and then bypass the 100ms
sleep.
It is hard to set a perfect number for the threshold, so I just give an
example of "256" for it.
I appreciate it if you can give me your suggestion/comments. Thanks.
On 4/16/2021 10:35 AM, zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
>
> In the system with very few file pages, it is easy to reproduce
> "nr_isolated_file > nr_inactive_file", then too_many_isolated return true,
> shrink_inactive_list enter "msleep(100)", the long latency will happen.
> The test case to reproduce it is very simple, allocate a lot of huge pages
> (near the DRAM size), then do free, repeat the same operation many times.
> There is a 3/10 rate to reproduce the issue. In the test, sc-> gfp_mask
> is 0x342cca ("_GFP_IO" and "__GFP_FS" is masked),it is more easy to enter
> “inactive >>=3”, then “isolated > inactive” will easy to be true.
>
> So I have a proposal to set a threshold number for the total file pages
> to ignore the system with very few file pages, and then bypass the 100ms
> sleep. It is hard to set a perfect number for the threshold, so I
> just give an example of "256" for it, need more inputs for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 562e87cbd7a1..a1926463455c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct scan_control {
> * From 0 .. 200. Higher means more swappy.
> */
> int vm_swappiness = 60;
> +int lru_list_threshold = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX << 3;
>
> static void set_task_reclaim_state(struct task_struct *task,
> struct reclaim_state *rs)
> @@ -1785,7 +1786,7 @@ int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
> static int too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
> struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> - unsigned long inactive, isolated;
> + unsigned long inactive, isolated, active, nr_lru_pages;
>
> if (current_is_kswapd())
> return 0;
> @@ -1796,11 +1797,13 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
> if (file) {
> inactive = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> isolated = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_FILE);
> + active = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE);
> } else {
> inactive = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> isolated = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> + active = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_ANON);
> }
> -
> + nr_lru_pages = inactive + active;
> /*
> * GFP_NOIO/GFP_NOFS callers are allowed to isolate more pages, so they
> * won't get blocked by normal direct-reclaimers, forming a circular
> @@ -1809,6 +1812,10 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
> if ((sc->gfp_mask & (__GFP_IO | __GFP_FS)) == (__GFP_IO | __GFP_FS))
> inactive >>= 3;
>
> + if (isolated > inactive)
> + if (nr_lru_pages < lru_list_threshold)
> + return 0;
> +
> return isolated > inactive;
> }
>
>
--
Zhengjun Xing
[-- Attachment #2: proc-vmstat-anon.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 4897 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: proc-vmstat-file.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 6729 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #4: proc-vmstat-file-all.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 6738 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 2:35 zhengjun.xing
2021-04-22 8:36 ` Xing Zhengjun [this message]
2021-04-22 10:23 ` Hillf Danton
2021-04-23 6:55 ` Xing Zhengjun
2021-04-30 5:33 ` Xing Zhengjun
2021-04-30 6:43 ` Hillf Danton
2021-05-10 8:03 ` Xing Zhengjun
2021-05-10 9:46 ` Hillf Danton
2021-04-22 17:13 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-22 18:51 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-22 20:15 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-22 20:17 ` Tim Chen
2021-04-22 20:30 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-22 20:38 ` Tim Chen
2021-04-22 20:57 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-22 21:02 ` Tim Chen
2021-04-23 6:57 ` Xing Zhengjun
2021-04-23 20:23 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-25 0:48 ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-27 21:53 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-30 5:57 ` Xing Zhengjun
2021-04-30 6:24 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-28 11:55 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-28 15:05 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-29 10:00 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-30 8:34 ` Yu Zhao
2021-04-30 9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-30 17:04 ` Yu Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b7a1c09-3d16-e199-15d2-ccea906d4a66@linux.intel.com \
--to=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox