From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A542C3815B for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E6320B1F for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com header.b="39M90MWn" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E3E6320B1F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=amd.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7F45D8E0005; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:52:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7A5788E0003; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:52:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6927C8E0005; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:52:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0113.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.113]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA068E0003 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:52:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027A98245571 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76728978102.30.arch31_15e398bb5d352 X-HE-Tag: arch31_15e398bb5d352 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 9573 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12on2084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.243.84]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:30 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ccYo/cmfpe5fodc/OYQgIMoa4+KExM9zcSaTsZkc1Z2jU1jcC2IkMZFwndi8sAAzavl1xv/rI9sKP9Yqhy3kuScYE4+QRLuxr8uVAoiEs4zZwuA2h75t+KudMVAUfICcSsH5EW4g8mq69G9JR+QgJhs1C1KI+akpuXM0sXs2IBjb25v4x6T65P6xAoicGOUacnI7iUXzGnWEWNCMUQo9xLw39mCDNjHrI/3+R5hXt9VfzYWHFijuu4H/mGoSCVejYubt4ZLGK5oP+MGqSUk+CUNXSLQjmSq52XY0x8BPhUMvLD6GPQ6Ji5lTXs56Ty6AC9SrpOI7UFeFkJIUtwpmNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Xz2XZBnz6DDavURpQmofPRODhZE3ebr44a2k4OUazkQ=; b=jiL3JoGajUPhtSVJtxDs+O/mDMatUrulh+u4aV0kbhs63ywsFoSfkWeuqcEHVCp6d48RAvWaNiUuaWAkxLAtboMN4ZonCRhUCgEr5vzX86cKb3xtCeIboLvcQGR+MDchfZXqpdzIcROPzmxAjKDGIUrhAJp4JQxnzxQaSpzm7eDhm2Y8KVbUnnd6TJj9yNynPngG3xHuvpkvi2fguHkuAh+ydmA8tlFzk+3qs5kc4x7s4sJ35qU0bp03H7MF9wbHdVAWDVnw5ltv/NdXm7+G0QJwynq5jWG1qC5IWLPw8r9//EYv/QhZ+8k5QCP/NJqSa+CqG1aGkiLZ54XddhaJQw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=pass header.d=amd.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amdcloud.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-amdcloud-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Xz2XZBnz6DDavURpQmofPRODhZE3ebr44a2k4OUazkQ=; b=39M90MWnrJeVuwuAzqqy2u93BbxNqoGDsMBBB+ahxl+ErsFZDgcG0+rhWkhUkNk4DYKqYdPrCcee2xyqTbHZeubtH0bYUlhmQKA4TzaJgDQOByHAYWS/JEmXVoGuRXl2WtQIcCrXcNaqgkpCWiNrs3Nj7rhqePpwwGdM0h4dXVQ= Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com; Received: from SN1PR12MB2414.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:802:2e::31) by SN1PR12MB2573.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:802:2b::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.29; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:28 +0000 Received: from SN1PR12MB2414.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38ef:1510:9525:f806]) by SN1PR12MB2414.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::38ef:1510:9525:f806%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2921.027; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/25] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces To: Jacob Pan Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , Christoph Hellwig , Jean-Philippe Brucker , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, joro@8bytes.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, xuzaibo@huawei.com References: <20200414170252.714402-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200414170252.714402-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200416072852.GA32000@infradead.org> <20200416085402.GB1286150@myrica> <20200416121331.GA18661@infradead.org> <20200420074213.GA3180232@myrica> <20200420081034.GA17305@infradead.org> <6b195512-fa73-9a49-03d8-1ed92e86f607@amd.com> <20200420115504.GA20664@infradead.org> <966e190e-ca9f-4c64-af05-43b0f0d8d012@amd.com> <65709b48-526b-ff43-760c-0fe0317d5e9c@amd.com> <20200420104410.3d1622e7@jacob-builder> From: Felix Kuehling Message-ID: <7aed25d4-5852-a000-2ad0-1519e990858e@amd.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:52:25 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 In-Reply-To: <20200420104410.3d1622e7@jacob-builder> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B0908AA1E22B309E1D932016" Content-Language: en-US X-ClientProxiedBy: YTXPR0101CA0031.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:b00::44) To SN1PR12MB2414.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:802:2e::31) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.2.100] (142.116.63.128) by YTXPR0101CA0031.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:b00::44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:52:26 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [142.116.63.128] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 69849361-4f27-4d32-0466-08d7e5539759 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SN1PR12MB2573:|SN1PR12MB2573: X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882; X-Forefront-PRVS: 03793408BA X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:SN1PR12MB2414.namprd12.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFTY:;SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(136003)(396003)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(86362001)(36756003)(4326008)(6486002)(6916009)(316002)(478600001)(16526019)(7416002)(31696002)(186003)(54906003)(2906002)(16576012)(8936002)(81156014)(8676002)(26005)(2616005)(956004)(66476007)(66556008)(5660300002)(66946007)(44832011)(52116002)(31686004)(33964004);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: amd.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: tVgw9wdQDKmPeU4jWiAJzT/Pdf/Jmgdz5qxbkIDsTbykm6fYRQI7KpjbI4cSn1+VL5WmazKSNaI4kiaVa5zt3vjwr6hS2zxITIAL02RhApH1MJ3SVmMWipcKRGL1MtFDc3sKPhKPPr+ndIAf9SfMOkHLpATQ8xhMOL6H1nh0z7O3nn4eAD31RqLvC5EmrnvAx0Vh2tVEDunUIJllK+zH6IK3WIDWurXBsUjTuXv1CRHHrYHFCPoThN1V0n8G8rlYWec6Gj02a5oAtUGuJ25o2a5X5BsLIck+VOM2KSpIpge+KOFJWLskSWkKZ1M9c08h76jOTEPM25VXXUFBDdZ/oboasHkVkfm4CXL5E95vUYdJ5nakzuYbVFIyo5MdpHRDzRQ0obGS9MQt/YVjykeYsPmb3RVqGJa1Tn5B2PdcMnxyyoBrq6HPHMiCccDgEKGs X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: xUJyYlBu30PCbPxgyvOudFlG/5sGVUc1ZcXlaaMNzRbHKfQVDhzrT6cosLjbsS2YFbUC+HLwnACIdfohVaGFQ3+apsYYw3dLfE4u6+mc/pmpNdf2ZJX1P8SE9uw8T/LfBvU/ON5/4WsIs+X0cKxkYQ== X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 69849361-4f27-4d32-0466-08d7e5539759 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Apr 2020 17:52:28.3042 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: mGPdiuL9jGADnWl48EjrmTkT9FPCLwY4PgtSMpMsYn/UfvzFIqKQozvzhxiUPfll6tloilHaQqCAnZJ8a/s7fA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR12MB2573 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: --------------B0908AA1E22B309E1D932016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 2020-04-20 um 1:44 p.m. schrieb Jacob Pan: >> The bottom line is, when you allocate a PASID for a context, you want >> to know how small it needs to be for all the devices that want to use >> it. If you make it too big, some device will not be able to use it. >> If you make it too small, you waste precious PASIDs that could be >> used for other contexts that need them. >> > So for AMD, system-wide PASID allocation works with the > restriction/optimization above? > Yes for KFD. On multi-GPU systems we allocate one PASID for the whole process and use it on all GPUs. For AMDGPU graphics contexts, we allocate one PASID for each per-GPU context. But they're allocated from a single global PASID namespace managed by the AMDGPU driver and shared with KFD. So we're wasting PASIDs here, but we are compatible with a single system-wide PASID namespace. Regards, =C2=A0 Felix --------------B0908AA1E22B309E1D932016 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Am 2020-04-20 um 1:44 p.m. schrieb Jacob Pan:
The bottom line is, when y=
ou allocate a PASID for a context, you want
to know how small it needs to be for all the devices that want to use
it. If you make it too big, some device will not be able to use it.
If you make it too small, you waste precious PASIDs that could be
used for other contexts that need them.


So for AMD, system-wide PASI=
D allocation works with the
restriction/optimization above?

Yes for KFD. On multi-GPU systems we allocate one PASID for the whole process and use it on all GPUs.

For AMDGPU graphics contexts, we allocate one PASID for each per-GPU context. But they're allocated from a single global PASID namespace managed by the AMDGPU driver and shared with KFD. So we're wasting PASIDs here, but we are compatible with a single system-wide PASID namespace.

Regards,
  Felix

--------------B0908AA1E22B309E1D932016--