From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v2 2/4] mm/mempolicy: unify the preprocessing for mbind and set_mempolicy
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 22:16:11 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a58082-eb68-744c-93b7-1a688b3b27a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621499404-67756-3-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>
On Thu, 20 May 2021, Feng Tang wrote:
> Currently the kernel_mbind() and kernel_set_mempolicy() do almost
> the same operation for parameter sanity check and preprocessing.
>
> Add a macro to unify the code to reduce the redundancy, and make
> it easier for changing the pre-processing code in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/mempolicy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 1964cca..0f5bf60 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1460,25 +1460,29 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode,
> return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> }
>
> +#define MPOL_PRE_PROCESS() \
This should be extracted to helper function returning bool, not a macro.
> + \
> + nodemask_t nodes; \
> + int err; \
> + unsigned short mode_flags; \
> + mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \
> + mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \
> + if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) \
> + return -EINVAL; \
> + if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && \
> + (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) \
> + return -EINVAL; \
> + err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); \
> + if (err) \
> + return err;
> +
> static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask,
> unsigned long maxnode, unsigned int flags)
> {
> - nodemask_t nodes;
> - int err;
> - unsigned short mode_flags;
> + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS();
>
> start = untagged_addr(start);
> - mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> - if (mode >= MPOL_MAX)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) &&
> - (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> return do_mbind(start, len, mode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -1493,20 +1497,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len,
> static long kernel_set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask,
> unsigned long maxnode)
> {
> - int err;
> - nodemask_t nodes;
> - unsigned short flags;
> -
> - flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> - if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - return do_set_mempolicy(mode, flags, &nodes);
> + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS();
> + return do_set_mempolicy(mode, mode_flags, &nodes);
> }
>
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(set_mempolicy, int, mode, const unsigned long __user *, nmask,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 8:30 [RFC Patch v2 0/4] mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup Feng Tang
2021-05-20 8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: skip nodemask intersect check for 'interleave' when oom Feng Tang
2021-05-24 5:15 ` David Rientjes
2021-05-24 5:55 ` Feng Tang
2021-05-20 8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 2/4] mm/mempolicy: unify the preprocessing for mbind and set_mempolicy Feng Tang
2021-05-24 5:16 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2021-05-24 5:59 ` Feng Tang
2021-05-24 8:32 ` Feng Tang
2021-05-20 8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: don't handle MPOL_LOCAL like a fake MPOL_PREFERRED policy Feng Tang
2021-05-20 8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 4/4] mm/mempolicy: kill MPOL_F_LOCAL bit Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a58082-eb68-744c-93b7-1a688b3b27a@google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox