linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	 Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	 ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v2 2/4] mm/mempolicy: unify the preprocessing for mbind and set_mempolicy
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 22:16:11 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a58082-eb68-744c-93b7-1a688b3b27a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621499404-67756-3-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>

On Thu, 20 May 2021, Feng Tang wrote:

> Currently the kernel_mbind() and kernel_set_mempolicy() do almost
> the same operation for parameter sanity check and preprocessing.
> 
> Add a macro to unify the code to reduce the redundancy, and make
> it easier for changing the pre-processing code in future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> ---
>  mm/mempolicy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 1964cca..0f5bf60 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1460,25 +1460,29 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode,
>  	return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0;
>  }
>  
> +#define MPOL_PRE_PROCESS() \

This should be extracted to helper function returning bool, not a macro.

> +	 \
> +	nodemask_t nodes; \
> +	int err; \
> +	unsigned short mode_flags; \
> +	mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \
> +	mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \
> +	if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) \
> +		return -EINVAL; \
> +	if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && \
> +		(mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) \
> +		return -EINVAL; \
> +	err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); \
> +	if (err) \
> +		return err;
> +
>  static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
>  			 unsigned long mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask,
>  			 unsigned long maxnode, unsigned int flags)
>  {
> -	nodemask_t nodes;
> -	int err;
> -	unsigned short mode_flags;
> +	MPOL_PRE_PROCESS();
>  
>  	start = untagged_addr(start);
> -	mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> -	mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> -	if (mode >= MPOL_MAX)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) &&
> -	    (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
>  	return do_mbind(start, len, mode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1493,20 +1497,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len,
>  static long kernel_set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask,
>  				 unsigned long maxnode)
>  {
> -	int err;
> -	nodemask_t nodes;
> -	unsigned short flags;
> -
> -	flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> -	mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> -	if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -	return do_set_mempolicy(mode, flags, &nodes);
> +	MPOL_PRE_PROCESS();
> +	return do_set_mempolicy(mode, mode_flags, &nodes);
>  }
>  
>  SYSCALL_DEFINE3(set_mempolicy, int, mode, const unsigned long __user *, nmask,
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-24  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20  8:30 [RFC Patch v2 0/4] mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup Feng Tang
2021-05-20  8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: skip nodemask intersect check for 'interleave' when oom Feng Tang
2021-05-24  5:15   ` David Rientjes
2021-05-24  5:55     ` Feng Tang
2021-05-20  8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 2/4] mm/mempolicy: unify the preprocessing for mbind and set_mempolicy Feng Tang
2021-05-24  5:16   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2021-05-24  5:59     ` Feng Tang
2021-05-24  8:32       ` Feng Tang
2021-05-20  8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: don't handle MPOL_LOCAL like a fake MPOL_PREFERRED policy Feng Tang
2021-05-20  8:30 ` [RFC Patch v2 4/4] mm/mempolicy: kill MPOL_F_LOCAL bit Feng Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a58082-eb68-744c-93b7-1a688b3b27a@google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox