From: Shardul Bankar <shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, dev.jain@arm.com, david@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+a785d07959bc94837d51@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev,
janak@mpiricsoftware.com, shardulsb08@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: khugepaged: fix memory leak in collapse_file xas retry loop
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 23:07:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a31f01ac0d63788e5fbac15192c35229e1f980a.camel@mpiricsoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aSSGH6IBIuK64EUX@casper.infradead.org>
On Mon, 2025-11-24 at 16:21 +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> Then wouldn't freeing the excess node in xas_create_range() be the
> correct fix, instead of requiring the caller to think about this?
>
>
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for the feedback. Agreed, this is better fixed inside xarray
instead of in collapse_file(), so callers don’t need to think about
xas_destroy() at all.
Looking at the internals, xas_nomem() only allocates a spare node into
xas->xa_alloc and xas_alloc() consumes it only if it is required. The
only point where we know that the retry loop is truly finished is after
xas_create_range() (or xas_create()) succeeds — at that point, any
remaining xa_alloc must be unused.
So to align API expectations, I’m trying to understand where you would
prefer to enforce the invariant:
- In xas_create_range() after success, ensuring no spare remains?
- Or in xas_create(), so that non-range callers benefit as well?
Once that API boundary is clear, I can prepare a v3 that moves the fix
into lib/xarray.c.
Thanks,
Shardul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-23 13:27 [PATCH] mm: khugepaged: fix memory leak in collapse_file rollback path Shardul Bankar
2025-11-23 14:49 ` Dev Jain
2025-11-24 10:02 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 11:46 ` Dev Jain
2025-11-24 15:23 ` Shardul Bankar
2025-11-24 16:11 ` [PATCH v2] mm: khugepaged: fix memory leak in collapse_file xas retry loop Shardul Bankar
2025-11-24 16:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-24 17:37 ` Shardul Bankar [this message]
2025-12-01 7:45 ` [PATCH v3] lib: xarray: free unused spare node in xas_create_range() Shardul Bankar
2025-12-01 8:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-04 14:15 ` Shardul Bankar
2025-12-04 21:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a31f01ac0d63788e5fbac15192c35229e1f980a.camel@mpiricsoftware.com \
--to=shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=janak@mpiricsoftware.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shardulsb08@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+a785d07959bc94837d51@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox