linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Ray Bryant <raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:26:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7CE20BE034007D536E3724B3@[10.1.1.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601240211.59171.ak@suse.de>

--On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 02:11:58 +0100 Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:

> Really? That sounds like a quite bad idea because it can easily break
> if something changes in the way virtual memory is laid out (which
> has happened - e.g. movement to 4level page tables on x86-64 and now
> randomized mmaps) 
> 
> I don't think we should encourage such unportable behaviour.

I haven't looked into how they do it.  It could be as simple as mapping the
memory region, then forking all the processes that use it.  Or they could
be communicating the mapped address to the other processes dynamically via
some other mechanism.  All I know is the memory ends up being mapped at the
same address in all processes.

Or are you saying using the same address is a bad thing even if it's
determined at runtime?

Dave McCracken

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-24  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-05 16:19 Dave McCracken
2006-01-07 12:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-01-07 18:09   ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-08 12:09     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-01-08 14:04       ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-13  5:15 ` Brian Twichell
2006-01-13 22:34   ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-17  4:50     ` Brian Twichell
2006-01-25  4:14   ` Brian Twichell
2006-01-13 15:18 ` Phillip Susi
2006-01-14 20:45   ` Brian Twichell
2006-01-17 23:53 ` Robin Holt
2006-01-18  0:17   ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-18  6:11     ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-18  1:27   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-18  3:32     ` Robin Holt
2006-01-23 23:58   ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-24  0:16     ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-24  0:39       ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-24  0:51         ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-24  1:11           ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-24  1:26             ` Dave McCracken [this message]
2006-01-24  0:53         ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-24  1:00           ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-24  1:10           ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-24  1:23             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-24  1:38               ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-24  7:08                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-24  7:06             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-24  7:18               ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-27 18:16                 ` Martin Bligh
2006-02-01  9:49                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-24 14:48               ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-24 14:56                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-24  0:19     ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-24  0:46       ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-24 23:43       ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-24 23:50         ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-25  0:21           ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-25 22:48           ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-25 22:52             ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-26  0:16               ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-26  0:58               ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-26  4:06                 ` Robin Holt
2006-01-20 21:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-20 21:54   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-23 17:39   ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-23 20:19     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-24 17:50     ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-24 18:07       ` Dave McCracken
2006-01-24 18:20         ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-27 22:50   ` Brian Twichell
2006-01-30 18:46     ` Ray Bryant
2006-01-31 18:47       ` Brian Twichell
2006-01-31 19:18         ` Dave McCracken

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='7CE20BE034007D536E3724B3@[10.1.1.4]' \
    --to=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox