linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] (no cover subject)
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 09:53:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78c79b17-6827-4679-aaef-4633eada9043@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926-numa-emu-v1-0-714f2691bf8b@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 26/09/25 4:04 PM, pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com wrote:
> mm/numa_emulation: Code refactoring to improve modularity and
> readability

This should have been the cover letter subject line.
> 
> This series intends to improve the code readability by using
> existing macros instead of hardcoded values for size and improves
> the modularity by moving the size calculation for emulated blocks
> to a separate function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>

In general, a signed of statement is not required for the cover letter.
> ---
> Pratyush Brahma (2):
>       mm/numa_emulation: Refactor NUMA emulation size handling to use kernel macros
>       mm/numa_emulation: Move the size calculation in split_nodes_interleave() to a separate function
> 
>  mm/numa_emulation.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 4ff71af020ae59ae2d83b174646fc2ad9fcd4dc4
> change-id: 20250926-numa-emu-6e6c27bd8f6f
> 
> Best regards,
> --  
> Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>

Ditto.

Seems like portions of this cover letter has been all jumbled up.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-07  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-26 10:34 pratyush.brahma
2025-09-26 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/numa_emulation: Refactor NUMA emulation size handling to use kernel macros pratyush.brahma
2025-09-26 10:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/numa_emulation: Move the size calculation in split_nodes_interleave() to a separate function pratyush.brahma
2025-09-26 13:48   ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-29  7:16     ` Pratyush Brahma
2025-10-07  2:48       ` Pratyush Brahma
2025-10-07  4:23 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78c79b17-6827-4679-aaef-4633eada9043@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox