From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kas@kernel.org,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmstat: spread vmstat_update requeue across the stat interval
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 11:36:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78a063c5-286d-4eea-8aae-2c0f1d0847e9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adaGcf2hKNGHwVPd@gmail.com>
On 4/8/26 19:00, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 08:13:43AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 12:13:04PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
>> index 2370c6fb1fcd6..8d53242e7aa66 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
>> @@ -2139,8 +2139,12 @@ static void vmstat_shepherd(struct work_struct *w)
>> if (cpu_is_isolated(cpu))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (!delayed_work_pending(dw) && need_update(cpu))
>> + if (!delayed_work_pending(dw) && need_update(cpu)) {
>> + WARN_ONCE(work_busy(&dw->work) & WORK_BUSY_RUNNING,
>> + "cpu%d: vmstat_update already running, scheduling again\n",
>> + cpu);
>> queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, mm_percpu_wq, dw, 0);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> cond_resched();
>>
>> The fix is a one-line change: !delayed_work_pending(dw) → !work_busy(&dw->work)
>
> In my testing, this race condition occurs more frequently than expected,
> likely due to the timer configurations we've been discussing throughout
> this thread.
>
> I developed a diagnostic patch to monitor vmstat_update worker scheduling
> frequency, and the results show consistently low values. Avoiding
> rescheduling a worker that is already also reduces the contention on
> stress-ng test case.
>
> commit d725f0664b70aa5c677215b0fc1abc0117aaf114
> Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Date: Wed Apr 8 09:01:02 2026 -0700
>
> mm/vmstat: fix vmstat_shepherd double-scheduling vmstat_update
>
> vmstat_shepherd uses delayed_work_pending() to check whether
> vmstat_update is already scheduled for a given CPU before queuing it.
> However, delayed_work_pending() only tests WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT,
> which is cleared the moment a worker thread picks up the work to
> execute it.
>
> This means that while vmstat_update is actively running on a CPU,
> delayed_work_pending() returns false. If need_update() also returns
> true at that point (per-cpu counters not yet zeroed mid-flush), the
> shepherd queues a second invocation with delay=0, causing vmstat_update
> to run again immediately after finishing.
>
> On a 72-CPU system this race is readily observable: before the fix,
> many CPUs show invocation gaps well below 500 jiffies (the minimum
> round_jiffies_relative() can produce), with the most extreme cases
> reaching 0 jiffies—vmstat_update called twice within the same jiffy.
>
> Fix this by replacing delayed_work_pending() with work_busy(), which
> returns non-zero for both WORK_BUSY_PENDING (timer armed or work
> queued) and WORK_BUSY_RUNNING (work currently executing). The shepherd
> now correctly skips a CPU in all busy states.
>
> After the fix, all sub-jiffy and most sub-100-jiffie gaps disappear.
> The remaining early invocations have gaps in the 700–999 jiffie range,
> attributable to round_jiffies_relative() aligning to a nearer
> jiffie-second boundary rather than to this race.
>
> Each spurious vmstat_update invocation has a measurable side effect:
> refresh_cpu_vm_stats() calls decay_pcp_high() for every zone, which
> drains idle per-CPU pages back to the buddy allocator via
> free_pcppages_bulk(), taking the zone spinlock each time. Eliminating
> the double-scheduling therefore reduces zone lock contention directly.
> On a 72-CPU stress-ng workload measured with perf lock contention:
>
> free_pcppages_bulk contention count: ~55% reduction
> free_pcppages_bulk total wait time: ~57% reduction
> free_pcppages_bulk max wait time: ~47% reduction
Great!
> Note: work_busy() is inherently racy—between the check and the
> subsequent queue_delayed_work_on() call, vmstat_update can finish
> execution, leaving the work neither pending nor running. In that
> narrow window the shepherd can still queue a second invocation.
> After the fix, this residual race is rare and produces only occasional
> small gaps, a significant improvement over the systematic
> double-scheduling seen with delayed_work_pending().
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> index d59eff1582547..5489549241b51 100644
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ static void vmstat_shepherd(struct work_struct *w)
> if (cpu_is_isolated(cpu))
> continue;
>
> - if (!delayed_work_pending(dw) && need_update(cpu))
> + if (!work_busy(&dw->work) && need_update(cpu))
> queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, mm_percpu_wq, dw, 0);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-09 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 13:57 Breno Leitao
2026-04-01 14:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-04-01 14:39 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-01 14:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-04-01 14:47 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-01 15:01 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-04-01 15:23 ` Usama Arif
2026-04-01 15:43 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-01 15:50 ` Usama Arif
2026-04-01 15:52 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-01 17:46 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-02 12:40 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-02 13:33 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-07 15:39 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:13 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-08 15:13 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 17:00 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-09 9:36 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-04-09 9:17 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-02 12:43 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-04-02 7:18 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-02 12:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-02 13:26 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78a063c5-286d-4eea-8aae-2c0f1d0847e9@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox