From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] selftests/mm: size tmpfs according to PMD page size in split_huge_page_test
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:59:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <788E6384-F8E2-4285-8303-E614AD78A771@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4284688bbec0901d25f88ee1b55c7495fa26b125.1773134177.git.sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
On 10 Mar 2026, at 5:49, Sayali Patil wrote:
> The split_file_backed_thp() test mounts a tmpfs with a fixed size of
> "4m". This works on systems with smaller PMD page sizes,
> but fails on configurations where the PMD huge page size is
> larger (e.g. 16MB).
>
> On such systems, the fixed 4MB tmpfs is insufficient to allocate even
> a single PMD-sized THP, causing the test to fail.
>
> Fix this by sizing the tmpfs dynamically based on the runtime
> pmd_pagesize, allocating space for two PMD-sized pages.
>
> Before patch:
> running ./split_huge_page_test /tmp/xfs_dir_YTrI5E
> --------------------------------------------------
> TAP version 13
> 1..55
> ok 1 Split zero filled huge pages successful
> ok 2 Split huge pages to order 0 successful
> ok 3 Split huge pages to order 2 successful
> ok 4 Split huge pages to order 3 successful
> ok 5 Split huge pages to order 4 successful
> ok 6 Split huge pages to order 5 successful
> ok 7 Split huge pages to order 6 successful
> ok 8 Split huge pages to order 7 successful
> ok 9 Split PTE-mapped huge pages successful
> Please enable pr_debug in split_huge_pages_in_file() for more info.
> Failed to write data to testing file: Success (0)
> Bail out! Error occurred
> Planned tests != run tests (55 != 9)
> Totals: pass:9 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> [FAIL]
>
> After patch:
> --------------------------------------------------
> running ./split_huge_page_test /tmp/xfs_dir_bMvj6o
> --------------------------------------------------
> TAP version 13
> 1..55
> ok 1 Split zero filled huge pages successful
> ok 2 Split huge pages to order 0 successful
> ok 3 Split huge pages to order 2 successful
> ok 4 Split huge pages to order 3 successful
> ok 5 Split huge pages to order 4 successful
> ok 6 Split huge pages to order 5 successful
> ok 7 Split huge pages to order 6 successful
> ok 8 Split huge pages to order 7 successful
> ok 9 Split PTE-mapped huge pages successful
> Please enable pr_debug in split_huge_pages_in_file() for more info.
> Please check dmesg for more information
> ok 10 File-backed THP split to order 0 test done
> Please enable pr_debug in split_huge_pages_in_file() for more info.
> Please check dmesg for more information
> ok 11 File-backed THP split to order 1 test done
> Please enable pr_debug in split_huge_pages_in_file() for more info.
> Please check dmesg for more information
> ok 12 File-backed THP split to order 2 test done
> ...
> ok 55 Split PMD-mapped pagecache folio to order 7 at
> in-folio offset 128 passed
> Totals: pass:55 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> [PASS]
> ok 1 split_huge_page_test /tmp/xfs_dir_bMvj6o
>
> Fixes: fbe37501b252 ("mm: huge_memory: debugfs for file-backed THP split")
> Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Thanks for fixing it.
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 9:49 [PATCH 00/13] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 01/13] selftests/mm: restore default nr_hugepages value during cleanup in charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:43 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 02/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction " Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:54 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 03/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction in hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:55 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 04/13] selftest/mm: fix cgroup task placement and tolerance " Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 05/13] selftests/mm: size tmpfs according to PMD page size in split_huge_page_test Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:59 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 06/13] selftest/mm: adjust hugepage-mremap test size for large huge pages Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:01 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 07/13] selftest/mm: register existing mapping with userfaultfd in hugepage-mremap Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 08/13] selftests/mm: ensure destination is hugetlb-backed " Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:07 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 09/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-wp-mremap if UFFD write-protect is unsupported Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:07 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 10/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-stress test when nr_pages_per_cpu is zero Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:08 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 11/13] selftests/mm: fix double increment in linked list cleanup in compaction_test Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:10 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 12/13] selftests/mm: move hwpoison setup into run_test() and silence modprobe output for memory-failure category Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:15 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-11 2:21 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 13/13] selftests/cgroup: extend test_hugetlb_memcg.c to support all huge page sizes Sayali Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=788E6384-F8E2-4285-8303-E614AD78A771@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox