linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Punit Agrawal" <punitagrawal@gmail.com>,
	"Anshuman Khandual" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	"Jun Yao" <yaojun8558363@gmail.com>,
	"Alex Van Brunt" <avanbrunt@nvidia.com>,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	hejianet@gmail.com, "Kaly Xin" <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: introduce helper cpu_has_hw_af()
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:20:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78881acb-5871-9534-c8cc-6f54937be3fd@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190918131914.38081-2-justin.he@arm.com>

Hi Jia,

On 18/09/2019 14:19, Jia He wrote:
> We unconditionally set the HW_AFDBM capability and only enable it on
> CPUs which really have the feature. But sometimes we need to know
> whether this cpu has the capability of HW AF. So decouple AF from
> DBM by new helper cpu_has_hw_af().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 6 ++++++
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index c96ffa4722d3..206b6e3954cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ extern DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE);
>   	for_each_set_bit(cap, cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS)
>   
>   bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap);
> +bool cpu_has_hw_af(void);
>   void cpu_set_feature(unsigned int num);
>   bool cpu_have_feature(unsigned int num);
>   unsigned long cpu_get_elf_hwcap(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index b1fdc486aed8..c5097f58649d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1141,6 +1141,12 @@ static bool has_hw_dbm(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap,
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +/* Decouple AF from AFDBM. */
> +bool cpu_has_hw_af(void)
> +{
Sorry for not having asked this earlier. Are we interested in,

"whether *this* CPU has AF support ?" or "whether *at least one*
CPU has the AF support" ? The following code does the former.

> +	return (read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1) & 0xf);

Getting the latter is tricky, and I think it is what we are looking
for here. In which case we may need something more to report this.

Kind regards
Suzuki


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-18 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-18 13:19 [PATCH v4 0/3] fix double page fault on arm64 Jia He
2019-09-18 13:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: introduce helper cpu_has_hw_af() Jia He
2019-09-18 14:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-09-18 16:49     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-18 14:20   ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2019-09-18 16:45     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-19  1:55       ` Justin He (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-18 13:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: mm: implement arch_faults_on_old_pte() on arm64 Jia He
2019-09-18 13:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm: fix double page fault on arm64 if PTE_AF is cleared Jia He
2019-09-18 14:00   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-18 18:00     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-19 15:00       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-19 15:41         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-19 15:51           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-19  2:16     ` Jia He
2019-09-19 14:57       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-19 15:02         ` Justin He (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-18 19:35   ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-19  1:46     ` Justin He (Arm Technology China)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78881acb-5871-9534-c8cc-6f54937be3fd@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=Kaly.Xin@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=avanbrunt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hejianet@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yaojun8558363@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox