From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com, pbadari@us.ibm.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] /proc/pid/maps doesn't match "ipcs -m" shmid
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 00:53:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <787b0d920706062153u7ad64179p1c4f3f663c3882f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070606204432.b670a7b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 6/6/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:27:01 -0400 "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Eric W. Biederman writes:
> > > Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> writes:
> >
> > >> Your recent cleanup to shm code, namely
> > >>
> > >> [PATCH] shm: make sysv ipc shared memory use stacked files
> > >>
> > >> took away one of the debugging feature for shm segments.
> > >> Originally, shmid were forced to be the inode numbers and
> > >> they show up in /proc/pid/maps for the process which mapped
> > >> this shared memory segments (vma listing). That way, its easy
> > >> to find out who all mapped this shared memory segment. Your
> > >> patchset, took away the inode# setting. So, we can't easily
> > >> match the shmem segments to /proc/pid/maps easily. (It was
> > >> really useful in tracking down a customer problem recently).
> > >> Is this done deliberately ? Anything wrong in setting this back ?
> > >
> > > Theoretically it makes the stacked file concept more brittle,
> > > because it means the lower layers can't care about their inode
> > > number.
> > >
> > > We do need something to tie these things together.
> > >
> > > So I suspect what makes most sense is to simply rename the
> > > dentry SYSVID<segmentid>
> >
> > Please stop breaking things in /proc. The pmap command relys
> > on the old behavior.
>
> What effect did this change have upon the pmap command? Details, please.
>
> > It's time to revert.
>
> Probably true, but we'd need to understand what the impact was.
Very simply, pmap reports the shmid.
albert 0 ~$ pmap `pidof X` | egrep -2 shmid
30050000 16384K rw-s- /dev/fb0
31050000 152K rw--- [ anon ]
31076000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f428000 ]
310d6000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f430001 ]
31136000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f438002 ]
31196000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f440003 ]
311f6000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f448004 ]
31256000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f450005 ]
312b6000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f460006 ]
31316000 384K rw-s- [ shmid=0x3f870007 ]
31491000 140K r---- /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/n021003l.pfb
3150e000 9496K rw--- [ anon ]
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-07 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-07 3:27 Albert Cahalan
2007-06-07 3:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-07 4:53 ` Albert Cahalan [this message]
2007-06-07 16:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-06-08 3:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-08 4:41 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-06-08 5:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-08 6:51 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-06-08 22:31 ` [PATCH] Restore shmid as inode# to fix /proc/pid/maps ABI breakage Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-08 16:07 ` [RFC][PATCH] /proc/pid/maps doesn't match "ipcs -m" shmid Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-08 23:43 ` [PATCH] shm: Fix the filename of hugetlb sysv shared memory Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-08 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-09 4:32 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-09 8:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-11 18:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-11 19:55 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-11 19:00 ` Adam Litke
2007-06-11 20:53 ` Ken Chen
2007-06-07 16:23 ` [RFC][PATCH] /proc/pid/maps doesn't match "ipcs -m" shmid Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-07 16:43 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-06-07 17:06 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-07 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-07 19:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-07 20:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-06-07 20:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-06-07 21:16 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-07 22:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-06-07 22:21 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-07 22:22 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-06-07 23:57 ` Badari Pulavarty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06 16:07 Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-06 17:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-06 17:37 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-06-06 18:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=787b0d920706062153u7ad64179p1c4f3f663c3882f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=acahalan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox