From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org,
linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:05:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <784658.1687176327@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <648f36d02fe6e_33cfbc2944f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it intentional to add MSG_MORE here in this patch?
>
> I do see that patch 3 removes this branch:
Yeah. I think I may have tcp_bpf a bit wrong with regard to handling
MSG_MORE.
How about the attached version of tcp_bpf_push()?
I wonder if it's save to move the setting of MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY out of the
loop as I've done here. The caller holds the socket lock.
Also, I'm not sure whether to take account of apply/apply_bytes when setting
MSG_MORE mid-message, or whether to just go on whether we've reached
sge->length yet. (I'm not sure exactly how tcp_bpf works).
David
---
static int tcp_bpf_push(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg, u32 apply_bytes,
int flags, bool uncharge)
{
bool apply = apply_bytes;
struct scatterlist *sge;
struct page *page;
int size, ret = 0;
u32 off;
flags |= MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
if (tls_sw_has_ctx_tx(sk))
msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY;
while (1) {
struct msghdr msghdr = {};
struct bio_vec bvec;
sge = sk_msg_elem(msg, msg->sg.start);
size = (apply && apply_bytes < sge->length) ?
apply_bytes : sge->length;
off = sge->offset;
page = sg_page(sge);
tcp_rate_check_app_limited(sk);
retry:
msghdr.msg_flags = flags;
/* Determine if we need to set MSG_MORE. */
if (!(msghdr.msg_flags & MSG_MORE)) {
if (apply && size < apply_bytes)
msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;
else if (!apply && size < sge->length &&
msg->sg.start != msg->sg.end)
msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;
}
bvec_set_page(&bvec, page, size, off);
iov_iter_bvec(&msghdr.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
ret = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msghdr, size);
if (ret <= 0)
return ret;
if (apply)
apply_bytes -= ret;
msg->sg.size -= ret;
sge->offset += ret;
sge->length -= ret;
if (uncharge)
sk_mem_uncharge(sk, ret);
if (ret != size) {
size -= ret;
off += ret;
goto retry;
}
if (!sge->length) {
put_page(page);
sk_msg_iter_next(msg, start);
sg_init_table(sge, 1);
if (msg->sg.start == msg->sg.end)
break;
}
if (apply && !apply_bytes)
break;
}
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-19 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230617121146.716077-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/17] net: Copy slab data for sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) David Howells
2023-06-18 16:43 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/17] net: Display info about MSG_SPLICE_PAGES memory handling in proc David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/17] tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/17] siw: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage to transmit David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/17] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/17] net: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) not sendpage in skb_send_sock() David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/17] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/17] rds: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/17] dlm: " David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage David Howells
2023-06-18 16:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-18 17:28 ` David Howells
2023-06-19 8:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-06-20 13:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-06-19 9:28 ` David Howells
2023-06-19 11:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/17] smc: Drop smc_sendpage() in favour of smc_sendmsg() + MSG_SPLICE_PAGES David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/17] ocfs2: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/17] drbd: " David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/17] drdb: Send an entire bio in a single sendmsg David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 15/17] iscsi: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST David Howells
2023-06-18 16:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-19 12:05 ` David Howells [this message]
2023-06-20 12:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=784658.1687176327@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox