linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
	rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:05:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <784658.1687176327@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <648f36d02fe6e_33cfbc2944f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>

Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it intentional to add MSG_MORE here in this patch?
> 
> I do see that patch 3 removes this branch:

Yeah.  I think I may have tcp_bpf a bit wrong with regard to handling
MSG_MORE.

How about the attached version of tcp_bpf_push()?

I wonder if it's save to move the setting of MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY out of the
loop as I've done here.  The caller holds the socket lock.

Also, I'm not sure whether to take account of apply/apply_bytes when setting
MSG_MORE mid-message, or whether to just go on whether we've reached
sge->length yet.  (I'm not sure exactly how tcp_bpf works).

David
---

static int tcp_bpf_push(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg, u32 apply_bytes,
			int flags, bool uncharge)
{
	bool apply = apply_bytes;
	struct scatterlist *sge;
	struct page *page;
	int size, ret = 0;
	u32 off;

	flags |= MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
	if (tls_sw_has_ctx_tx(sk))
		msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY;

	while (1) {
		struct msghdr msghdr = {};
		struct bio_vec bvec;

		sge = sk_msg_elem(msg, msg->sg.start);
		size = (apply && apply_bytes < sge->length) ?
			apply_bytes : sge->length;
		off  = sge->offset;
		page = sg_page(sge);

		tcp_rate_check_app_limited(sk);
retry:
		msghdr.msg_flags = flags;

		/* Determine if we need to set MSG_MORE. */
		if (!(msghdr.msg_flags & MSG_MORE)) {
			if (apply && size < apply_bytes)
				msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;
			else if (!apply && size < sge->length &&
				 msg->sg.start != msg->sg.end)
				msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;
		}

		bvec_set_page(&bvec, page, size, off);
		iov_iter_bvec(&msghdr.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
		ret = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msghdr, size);
		if (ret <= 0)
			return ret;

		if (apply)
			apply_bytes -= ret;
		msg->sg.size -= ret;
		sge->offset += ret;
		sge->length -= ret;
		if (uncharge)
			sk_mem_uncharge(sk, ret);
		if (ret != size) {
			size -= ret;
			off  += ret;
			goto retry;
		}
		if (!sge->length) {
			put_page(page);
			sk_msg_iter_next(msg, start);
			sg_init_table(sge, 1);
			if (msg->sg.start == msg->sg.end)
				break;
		}
		if (apply && !apply_bytes)
			break;
	}

	return 0;
}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-19 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230617121146.716077-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/17] net: Copy slab data for sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) David Howells
2023-06-18 16:43   ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/17] net: Display info about MSG_SPLICE_PAGES memory handling in proc David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/17] tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/17] siw: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage to transmit David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/17] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/17] net: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) not sendpage in skb_send_sock() David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/17] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/17] rds: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/17] dlm: " David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage David Howells
2023-06-18 16:47   ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-18 17:28   ` David Howells
2023-06-19  8:25     ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-06-20 13:00       ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-06-19  9:28     ` David Howells
2023-06-19 11:46     ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/17] smc: Drop smc_sendpage() in favour of smc_sendmsg() + MSG_SPLICE_PAGES David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/17] ocfs2: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/17] drbd: " David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/17] drdb: Send an entire bio in a single sendmsg David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 15/17] iscsi: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-17 12:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2 17/17] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST David Howells
2023-06-18 16:54   ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-19 12:05   ` David Howells [this message]
2023-06-20 12:59     ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=784658.1687176327@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox