linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
	Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ksm: use range-walk function to jump over holes in scan_get_next_rmap_item
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:59:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77b69bcb-6df0-4c3a-bb7c-a003fd51d292@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014151126.87589-1-pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>

On 14.10.25 17:11, Pedro Demarchi Gomes wrote:
> Currently, scan_get_next_rmap_item() walks every page address in a VMA
> to locate mergeable pages. This becomes highly inefficient when scanning
> large virtual memory areas that contain mostly unmapped regions.
> 
> This patch replaces the per-address lookup with a range walk using
> walk_page_range(). The range walker allows KSM to skip over entire
> unmapped holes in a VMA, avoiding unnecessary lookups.
> This problem was previously discussed in [1].
> 
> Changes since v1 [2]:
> - Use pmd_entry to walk page range
> - Use cond_resched inside pmd_entry()
> - walk_page_range returns page+folio
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/423de7a3-1c62-4e72-8e79-19a6413e420c@redhat.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251014055828.124522-1-pedrodemargomes@gmail.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>
> ---

[...]

> +
> +static int ksm_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> +			    unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = walk->mm;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
> +	struct ksm_walk_private *private = (struct ksm_walk_private *) walk->private;
> +	struct folio *folio;
> +	pte_t *start_pte, *pte, ptent;
> +	spinlock_t *ptl;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	start_pte = pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> +	if (!start_pte) {
> +		ksm_scan.address = end;
> +		return 0;
> +	}

Please take more time to understand the details. If there is a THP there 
you actually have to find the relevant page.

> +
> +	for (; addr < end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		ptent = ptep_get(pte);
> +		struct page *page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> +		ksm_scan.address = addr;

Updating that value from in here is a bit nasty. I wonder if you should 
rather make the function also return the address of the found page as well.

In the caller, if we don't find any page, there is no need to update the
address from this function I guess. We iterated the complete MM space in 
that case.

> +
> +		if (ksm_test_exit(mm)) {
> +			ret = 1;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!page)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		folio = page_folio(page);
> +		if (folio_is_zone_device(folio) || !folio_test_anon(folio))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = 1;
> +		folio_get(folio);
> +		private->page = page;
> +		private->folio = folio;
> +		private->vma = vma;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);
> +
> +	cond_resched();
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +struct mm_walk_ops walk_ops = {
> +	.pmd_entry = ksm_pmd_entry,
> +	.test_walk = ksm_walk_test,
> +	.walk_lock = PGWALK_RDLOCK,
> +};
> +
>   static struct ksm_rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
>   {
>   	struct mm_struct *mm;
>   	struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot;
>   	struct mm_slot *slot;
> -	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>   	struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item;
> -	struct vma_iterator vmi;
>   	int nid;
>   
>   	if (list_empty(&ksm_mm_head.slot.mm_node))
> @@ -2527,64 +2595,40 @@ static struct ksm_rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
>   
>   	slot = &mm_slot->slot;
>   	mm = slot->mm;
> -	vma_iter_init(&vmi, mm, ksm_scan.address);
>   
>   	mmap_read_lock(mm);
>   	if (ksm_test_exit(mm))
>   		goto no_vmas;
>   
> -	for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
> -		if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE))
> -			continue;
> -		if (ksm_scan.address < vma->vm_start)
> -			ksm_scan.address = vma->vm_start;
> -		if (!vma->anon_vma)
> -			ksm_scan.address = vma->vm_end;
> -
> -		while (ksm_scan.address < vma->vm_end) {
> -			struct page *tmp_page = NULL;
> -			struct folio_walk fw;
> -			struct folio *folio;
> +get_page:
> +	struct ksm_walk_private walk_private = {
> +		.page = NULL,
> +		.folio = NULL,
> +		.vma = NULL
> +	};
>   
> -			if (ksm_test_exit(mm))
> -				break;
> +	walk_page_range(mm, ksm_scan.address, -1, &walk_ops, (void *) &walk_private);
> +	if (walk_private.page) {
> +		flush_anon_page(walk_private.vma, walk_private.page, ksm_scan.address);
> +		flush_dcache_page(walk_private.page);

Keep working on the folio please.

> +		rmap_item = get_next_rmap_item(mm_slot,
> +			ksm_scan.rmap_list, ksm_scan.address);
> +		if (rmap_item) {
> +			ksm_scan.rmap_list =
> +					&rmap_item->rmap_list;
>   
> -			folio = folio_walk_start(&fw, vma, ksm_scan.address, 0);
> -			if (folio) {
> -				if (!folio_is_zone_device(folio) &&
> -				     folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> -					folio_get(folio);
> -					tmp_page = fw.page;
> -				}
> -				folio_walk_end(&fw, vma);
> +			ksm_scan.address += PAGE_SIZE;
> +			if (should_skip_rmap_item(walk_private.folio, rmap_item)) {
> +				folio_put(walk_private.folio);
> +				goto get_page;

Can you make that a while() loop to avoid the label?



-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-14 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-14 15:11 Pedro Demarchi Gomes
2025-10-14 15:59 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-10-14 21:57   ` Pedro Demarchi Gomes
2025-10-15  3:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-15  5:46 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-15 12:22 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77b69bcb-6df0-4c3a-bb7c-a003fd51d292@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pedrodemargomes@gmail.com \
    --cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox