From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A854C433F5 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 838956B0071; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7E83D6B0073; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:24:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 661798D0001; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:24:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0057.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.57]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C3A6B0071 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C29A231D for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:24:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79268915544.27.F6695E6 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874CC140022 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647879851; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=e821vFLY1EVDn4KoyJpKz5Am72wN4KzbQq0gwbdYqhA=; b=ah2KKNCfJpVy338nDEed8XYc1DVCgwGaiXmz80898hEKjIViG+3fCRxF1XxiztTW/27GDG 9O0bKL84KnxiY8G3iDSRtACWnio8+OEv7Hu+Xuq33AmENelSrI0lXE2deinAQc19Irww+D XMhRsGzdZeqMDQfm/BHR7hNT5VhBkJg= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-625-mEex24UCN0emHMp8eVoXhw-1; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:24:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mEex24UCN0emHMp8eVoXhw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id h127-20020a1c2185000000b0038c6f7e22a4so8489020wmh.9 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e821vFLY1EVDn4KoyJpKz5Am72wN4KzbQq0gwbdYqhA=; b=lDejtmSDhgdvENj6SnHKrR+I+GV/wUIRnv2BEh9LHjc7T00NULzjN17Ezog+04DjFZ dw08OBBZuLOeuCk1/eoJL6kbvq7uMMGPm8tDJIbn6GxOtpImZ1PcQs2ocQU3Wj1lPhXf ywTFutLi9Rlcp4mlQwHxlJdI2yXX0eBOZOax6aAefKvTEdv0LjM/dQTep4k8AdXAhgFQ GTT003+/ft8ot78WoCWeMrdmz4o4F+o/SdyRLmmUiWMSEIDdzg8Pw2KJ74nRCTzbosoN 99NlZXk2emVq/LmRfhV6barINgGkSJCHR/E1Igyvc191ap4697809FQXtI4NIPsMsInT jvow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320P+6g+7BLIVwOkU3WsiA/7qx7utPKrpZmb5lrkeD9ca9OZEcW AKfi0iglGBqI5D6bmATuVoEe0LAiecvXSCDsJ2fDzB4zAdRrVCHkYO6Ke3AqKVA6S4a4xQ4cAWh 3XCPOZK886yg= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6944:0:b0:203:e024:7cdd with SMTP id r4-20020a5d6944000000b00203e0247cddmr12197780wrw.503.1647879848170; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9CE39kD76mAvrAOZrfYAEauMmpFPCc+soZrVq94VaBpoGBRsY6R30BdbSebl0p+LNgjGRBg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6944:0:b0:203:e024:7cdd with SMTP id r4-20020a5d6944000000b00203e0247cddmr12197752wrw.503.1647879847940; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c704:4900:849b:f76e:5e1f:ff95? (p200300cbc7044900849bf76e5e1fff95.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c704:4900:849b:f76e:5e1f:ff95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i10-20020a0560001aca00b00203daf3759asm15006242wry.68.2022.03.21.09.24.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <77272de6-2c30-ea2a-c0e3-be89e47cf415@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:24:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing of anonymous pages To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Linus Torvalds , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , John Hubbard , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Yang Shi , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Vlastimil Babka , Jann Horn , Michal Hocko , Nadav Amit , Rik van Riel , Roman Gushchin , Andrea Arcangeli , Peter Xu , Donald Dutile , Christoph Hellwig , Oleg Nesterov , Jan Kara , Liang Zhang , Pedro Gomes , Oded Gabbay , linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20220315104741.63071-1-david@redhat.com> <20220315104741.63071-14-david@redhat.com> <20220318233035.GA11336@nvidia.com> <20220321161823.GZ11336@nvidia.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20220321161823.GZ11336@nvidia.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 874CC140022 X-Stat-Signature: wi4yum9qb7h1jnxc4mjja14ef465tn7o Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ah2KKNCf; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.129.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-HE-Tag: 1647879851-653938 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 21.03.22 17:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 05:15:06PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 19.03.22 00:30, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:47:39AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> Whenever GUP currently ends up taking a R/O pin on an anonymous page that >>>> might be shared -- mapped R/O and !PageAnonExclusive() -- any write fault >>>> on the page table entry will end up replacing the mapped anonymous page >>>> due to COW, resulting in the GUP pin no longer being consistent with the >>>> page actually mapped into the page table. >>>> >>>> The possible ways to deal with this situation are: >>>> (1) Ignore and pin -- what we do right now. >>>> (2) Fail to pin -- which would be rather surprising to callers and >>>> could break user space. >>>> (3) Trigger unsharing and pin the now exclusive page -- reliable R/O >>>> pins. >>>> >>>> We want to implement 3) because it provides the clearest semantics and >>>> allows for checking in unpin_user_pages() and friends for possible BUGs: >>>> when trying to unpin a page that's no longer exclusive, clearly >>>> something went very wrong and might result in memory corruptions that >>>> might be hard to debug. So we better have a nice way to spot such >>>> issues. >>>> >>>> To implement 3), we need a way for GUP to trigger unsharing: >>>> FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE. FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE is only applicable to R/O mapped >>>> anonymous pages and resembles COW logic during a write fault. However, in >>>> contrast to a write fault, GUP-triggered unsharing will, for example, still >>>> maintain the write protection. >>> >>> Given the way this series has developed you might want to call this >>> FAULT_FLAG_MAKE_ANON_EXCLUSIVE >>> >>> Which strikes me as more directly connected to what it is trying to >>> do. >> >> I thought about something similar along those lines, and I think it >> would apply even when extending that mechanism to anything !anon inside >> a MAP_PRIVATE mapping. >> >> The whole >> >> const bool unshare = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE; > > I think the extra words are worthwhile, share makes me think about > MAP_SHARED as we don't really use shared anywhere else FWICT.. Yeah, my point would be that you can only "unshare" in MAP_PRIVATE (!MAP_SHARED) :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb