From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 01/13] mm/vmalloc: fix HUGE_VMAP regression by enabling huge pages in vmalloc_to_page
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:40:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76f6c211-c383-51d2-7c5a-575f0d51b82d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126044510.2491820-2-npiggin@gmail.com>
Hi:
On 2021/1/26 12:44, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> vmalloc_to_page returns NULL for addresses mapped by larger pages[*].
> Whether or not a vmap is huge depends on the architecture details,
> alignments, boot options, etc., which the caller can not be expected
> to know. Therefore HUGE_VMAP is a regression for vmalloc_to_page.
>
> This change teaches vmalloc_to_page about larger pages, and returns
> the struct page that corresponds to the offset within the large page.
> This makes the API agnostic to mapping implementation details.
>
> [*] As explained by commit 029c54b095995 ("mm/vmalloc.c: huge-vmap:
> fail gracefully on unexpected huge vmap mappings")
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index e6f352bf0498..62372f9e0167 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/rbtree_augmented.h>
> #include <linux/overflow.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/shmparam.h>
> @@ -343,7 +343,9 @@ int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps.
> + * Walk a vmap address to the struct page it maps. Huge vmap mappings will
> + * return the tail page that corresponds to the base page address, which
> + * matches small vmap mappings.
> */
> struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> {
> @@ -363,25 +365,33 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
>
> if (pgd_none(*pgd))
> return NULL;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pgd_leaf(*pgd)))
> + return NULL; /* XXX: no allowance for huge pgd */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pgd_bad(*pgd)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
> if (p4d_none(*p4d))
> return NULL;
> - pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> + if (p4d_leaf(*p4d))
> + return p4d_page(*p4d) + ((addr & ~P4D_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p4d_bad(*p4d)))
> + return NULL;
>
> - /*
> - * Don't dereference bad PUD or PMD (below) entries. This will also
> - * identify huge mappings, which we may encounter on architectures
> - * that define CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP=y. Such regions will be
> - * identified as vmalloc addresses by is_vmalloc_addr(), but are
> - * not [unambiguously] associated with a struct page, so there is
> - * no correct value to return for them.
> - */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(pud_bad(*pud));
> - if (pud_none(*pud) || pud_bad(*pud))
> + pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> + if (pud_none(*pud))
> + return NULL;
> + if (pud_leaf(*pud))
> + return pud_page(*pud) + ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pud_bad(*pud)))
> return NULL;
> +
> pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(pmd_bad(*pmd));
> - if (pmd_none(*pmd) || pmd_bad(*pmd))
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + return NULL;
> + if (pmd_leaf(*pmd))
> + return pmd_page(*pmd) + ((addr & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
> return NULL;
>
> ptep = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
> @@ -389,6 +399,7 @@ struct page *vmalloc_to_page(const void *vmalloc_addr)
> if (pte_present(pte))
> page = pte_page(pte);
> pte_unmap(ptep);
> +
> return page;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page);
>
LGTM. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 4:44 [PATCH v11 00/13] huge vmalloc mappings Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:44 ` [PATCH v11 01/13] mm/vmalloc: fix HUGE_VMAP regression by enabling huge pages in vmalloc_to_page Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 6:40 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2021-01-28 3:13 ` Ding Tianhong
2021-02-02 10:22 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:44 ` [PATCH v11 02/13] mm: apply_to_pte_range warn and fail if a large pte is encountered Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 6:49 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 03/13] mm/vmalloc: rename vmap_*_range vmap_pages_*_range Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-27 2:10 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 04/13] mm/ioremap: rename ioremap_*_range to vmap_*_range Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 2:38 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 05/13] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 6:07 ` Ding Tianhong
2021-01-26 13:26 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-27 5:26 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 06/13] powerpc: inline huge vmap supported functions Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 07/13] arm64: " Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 08/13] x86: " Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 09/13] mm/vmalloc: provide fallback arch huge vmap support functions Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 10/13] mm: Move vmap_range from mm/ioremap.c to mm/vmalloc.c Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 11/13] mm/vmalloc: add vmap_range_noflush variant Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 12/13] mm/vmalloc: Hugepage vmalloc mappings Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 6:59 ` Ding Tianhong
2021-01-26 9:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-26 11:48 ` Ding Tianhong
2021-01-26 4:45 ` [PATCH v11 13/13] powerpc/64s/radix: Enable huge " Nicholas Piggin
2021-01-27 10:26 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76f6c211-c383-51d2-7c5a-575f0d51b82d@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox