From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: Log run_vmtests.sh results in TAP format
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:28:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76abe3b9-3f66-4336-b09d-d5c137ff6582@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07193932-941d-46f6-b152-d6c5fe09b26b@sirena.org.uk>
On 15/12/2023 14:08, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:58:45PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 15/12/2023 13:54, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> What I did for ftrace which had a similar situation was make a wrapper
>>> script which invokes the test runner, make the test runner a
>>> TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED so it's not run by the kselftest infrastructure
>>> automatically and make the wrapper a normal TEST_PROGS. Neither option
>>> is especially lovely.
>
>> Yeah that's a good idea... I'll wait and see if anyone shouts that this has
>> broken something. If nothing is broken, I think it is better to just make TAP
>> the default rather than adding yet another wrapper.
>
> I think it depends a bit how ergonomic the non-TAP output is for
> interactive use - TAP isn't amazing for humans so if there's something
> that's nicer it probably makes sense to keep that as the default. For
> these tests I'm not sure it's particularly an issue.
I've kept all the existing "pretty" output and results summary as is, it just
gets a hash in front of it when TAP is enabled.
so this:
-----------------------
running ./hugepage-mmap
-----------------------
Returned address is 0xffff89e00000
First hex is 0
First hex is 3020100
[PASS]
SUMMARY: PASS=1 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
becomes this:
TAP version 13
# -----------------------
# running ./hugepage-mmap
# -----------------------
# Returned address is 0xffff89e00000
# First hex is 0
# First hex is 3020100
# [PASS]
ok 1 hugepage-mmap
# SUMMARY: PASS=1 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
1..1
If you think the latter is ofensive, then I can do the wrapping as you suggest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-15 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-14 16:24 Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15 13:54 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-15 13:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15 14:08 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-15 14:28 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2023-12-15 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-16 2:25 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-16 2:40 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-18 11:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-19 0:51 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-19 0:55 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-19 8:33 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76abe3b9-3f66-4336-b09d-d5c137ff6582@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox