linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:03:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76FFFF68-15F3-4A36-BF1D-A33CF36FDC9E@konsulko.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c5852cc-2ca5-432b-8426-01c108df66cb@suse.cz>



> On Jul 8, 2025, at 2:52 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> On 7/7/25 18:49, Vitaly Wool wrote:
>> Reimplement k[v]realloc_node() to be able to set node and
>> alignment should a user need to do so. In order to do that while
>> retaining the maximal backward compatibility, add
>> k[v]realloc_node_align() functions and redefine the rest of API
>> using these new ones.
>> 
>> With that change we also provide the ability for the Rust part of
>> the kernel to set node and alignment in its K[v]xxx
>> [re]allocations.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
>> ---
>> include/linux/slab.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>> mm/slub.c            | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index d5a8ab98035c..13abcf4ada22 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -465,9 +465,15 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s);
>> /*
>>  * Common kmalloc functions provided by all allocators
>>  */
>> -void * __must_check krealloc_noprof(const void *objp, size_t new_size,
>> -     gfp_t flags) __realloc_size(2);
>> -#define krealloc(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> +void * __must_check krealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *objp, size_t new_size,
>> +        unsigned long align,
>> +        gfp_t flags, int nid) __realloc_size(2);
>> +#define krealloc_node_noprof(_p, _s, _f, _n) \
>> + krealloc_node_align_noprof(_p, _s, 1, _f, _n)
>> +#define krealloc_noprof(...) krealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> +#define krealloc_node_align(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> +#define krealloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> +#define krealloc(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> 
> Hm wonder if krealloc() and krealloc_node_align() would be enough. Is
> krealloc_node() only used between patch 3 and 4?
> Also perhaps it would be more concise to only have
> krealloc_node_align_noprof() with alloc_hooks wrappers filling the
> NUMA_NO_NODE (and 1), so we don't need to #define the _noprof variant of
> everything. The _noprof callers are rare so they can just always use
> krealloc_node_align_noprof() directly and also fill in the NUMA_NO_NODE (and 1).

I don’t think that krealloc_node() is used at all at the moment. I thought I’d define these to be symmetrical to vmalloc() but if you believe these are redundant, I’m all for removing them.

> 
>> void kfree(const void *objp);
>> void kfree_sensitive(const void *objp);
>> @@ -1041,18 +1047,23 @@ static inline __alloc_size(1) void *kzalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>> #define kzalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kzalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> #define kzalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node) kmalloc_node(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO, _node)
>> 
>> -void *__kvmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), gfp_t flags, int node) __alloc_size(1);
>> -#define kvmalloc_node_noprof(size, flags, node) \
>> - __kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, NULL), flags, node)
>> +void *__kvmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), unsigned long align,
>> +      gfp_t flags, int node) __alloc_size(1);
>> +#define kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(_size, _align, _flags, _node) \
>> + __kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, NULL), _align, _flags, _node)
>> +#define kvmalloc_node_noprof(_size, _flags, _node) \
>> + kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(_size, 1, _flags, _node)
>> +#define kvmalloc_node_align(...) \
>> + alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> #define kvmalloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>> 
>> -#define kvmalloc(_size, _flags) kvmalloc_node(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> -#define kvmalloc_noprof(_size, _flags) kvmalloc_node_noprof(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> +#define kvmalloc_noprof(...) kvmalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> +#define kvmalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> #define kvzalloc(_size, _flags) kvmalloc(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO)
>> 
>> -#define kvzalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node) kvmalloc_node(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO, _node)
>> +#define kvzalloc_node(_s, _f, _n) kvmalloc_node(_s, (_f)|__GFP_ZERO, _n)
>> #define kmem_buckets_valloc(_b, _size, _flags) \
>> - alloc_hooks(__kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, _b), _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE))
>> + alloc_hooks(__kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, _b), 1, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE))
>> 
>> static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *
>> kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>> @@ -1068,13 +1079,16 @@ kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>> #define kvmalloc_array_noprof(...) kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> #define kvcalloc_node_noprof(_n,_s,_f,_node) kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(_n,_s,(_f)|__GFP_ZERO,_node)
>> #define kvcalloc_noprof(...) kvcalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> -
>> #define kvmalloc_array(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_array_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> #define kvcalloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvcalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> #define kvcalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvcalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> 
>> -void *kvrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>> - __realloc_size(2);
>> +void *kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align,
>> +   gfp_t flags, int nid) __realloc_size(2);
>> +#define kvrealloc_node_align(...) kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)
>> +#define kvrealloc_node_noprof(_p, _s, _f, _n) kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(_p, _s, 1, _f, _n)
>> +#define kvrealloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvrealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> +#define kvrealloc_noprof(...) kvrealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> #define kvrealloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvrealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>> extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index c4b64821e680..881244c357dd 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -4845,7 +4845,7 @@ void kfree(const void *object)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree);
>> 
>> static __always_inline __realloc_size(2) void *
>> -__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
>> +__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, unsigned long align, gfp_t flags, int nid)
>> {
>> void *ret;
>> size_t ks = 0;
>> @@ -4859,6 +4859,20 @@ __do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
>> if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
>> return NULL;
>> 
>> + /* refuse to proceed if alignment is bigger than what kmalloc() provides */
>> + if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)p, align) || new_size < align)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + /*
>> +  * If reallocation is not necessary (e. g. the new size is less
>> +  * than the current allocated size), the current allocation will be
>> +  * preserved unless __GFP_THISNODE is set. In the latter case a new
>> +  * allocation on the requested node will be attempted.
>> +  */
>> + if (unlikely(flags & __GFP_THISNODE) && nid != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
>> +      nid != page_to_nid(vmalloc_to_page(p)))
> 
> We need virt_to_page() here not vmalloc_to_page().

Indeed, thanks. It is a c’n’p error, we had virt_to_page() in earlier patchsets (i. e. up until v10).

> 
>> + goto alloc_new;
>> +
>> if (is_kfence_address(p)) {
>> ks = orig_size = kfence_ksize(p);
>> } else {




  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-08 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-07 16:47 [PATCH v11 0/4] support large align and nid in Rust allocators Vitaly Wool
2025-07-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to set node and align in vrealloc Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:12   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-08 14:03     ` Vitaly Wool [this message]
2025-07-09 13:40       ` Vitaly Wool
2025-07-09 14:13         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] rust: add support for NUMA ids in allocations Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:15   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] rust: support large alignments " Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:16   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] support large align and nid in Rust allocators Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 11:12   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 11:55   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 12:36     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 13:41       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 14:06         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 13:19     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 14:16       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 14:39         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 15:11           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 15:40             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-09 11:31       ` Alice Ryhl
2025-07-09 12:24         ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76FFFF68-15F3-4A36-BF1D-A33CF36FDC9E@konsulko.se \
    --to=vitaly.wool@konsulko.se \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox