From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests/mm: remove local __NR_* definitions
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:04:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76770ce2-f6a6-4af0-b29c-0070933a1dfb@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc585017-6740-4cab-a536-b12b37a7582d@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1626 bytes --]
On 2/12/25 12:34 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 6/13/24 19:30, John Hubbard wrote:
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>> #include <sys/wait.h>
>> #include <sys/stat.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> -#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <linux/unistd.h>
>> #include <sys/ptrace.h>
>> #include <setjmp.h>
>
> I'm not quite sure how but this broke the protection_keys.c selftest for
> me. Before this commit (a5c6bc590094a1a73cf6fa3f505e1945d2bf2461) things
> are fine. But after, I get:
>
> running PKEY tests for unsupported CPU/OS
>
> The "unsupported" test just makes a pkey_alloc() syscall. It's probably
> calling the wrong syscall number or something.
>
> I think it's still broken in mainline. What's the right fix?
A couple of thoughts:
1) I now think that that commit was a bad idea, because it turns out
kselftests doesn't make it easy to set up an asm/header.h approach.
And this partial approach seems like it won't work at all for syscalls
in particular.
I think reverting the commit is appropriate. It doesn't revert cleanly
at top of tree, but a very small fix allows a revert.
I'm attaching a patch that does that.
2) I'm unable to reproduce what you saw, because in ALL cases (before
or after the commit, and with or without a revert), I get the same
results on my Intel test machine:
$ ./protection_keys_64
has pkeys: 0
running PKEY tests for unsupported CPU/OS
...so that's why I'm attaching a patch, in case you can verify that a
revert fixes it.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Revert-selftests-mm-remove-local-__NR_-definitions.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 8067 bytes --]
From 7f24274ccf3dfe7c66f4b50e353211ba3ade8f34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 23:38:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "selftests/mm: remove local __NR_* definitions"
X-NVConfidentiality: public
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
This reverts commit a5c6bc590094a1a73cf6fa3f505e1945d2bf2461 .
Details to follow, if this works. --jhubbard
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 8 +++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/mkdirty.c | 8 +++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2.h | 1 -
tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c | 4 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c
index ada9156cc497..c463d1c09c9b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h> /* Definition of O_* constants */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
index 66b4e111b5a2..b61803e36d1c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdint.h>
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
@@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ static void test_unmerge_discarded(void)
munmap(map, size);
}
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
static void test_unmerge_uffd_wp(void)
{
struct uffdio_writeprotect uffd_writeprotect;
@@ -429,6 +430,7 @@ static void test_unmerge_uffd_wp(void)
unmap:
munmap(map, size);
}
+#endif
/* Verify that KSM can be enabled / queried with prctl. */
static void test_prctl(void)
@@ -684,7 +686,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
exit(test_child_ksm());
}
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
tests++;
+#endif
ksft_print_header();
ksft_set_plan(tests);
@@ -696,7 +700,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
test_unmerge();
test_unmerge_zero_pages();
test_unmerge_discarded();
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
test_unmerge_uffd_wp();
+#endif
test_prot_none();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
index 74c911aa3aea..9a0597310a76 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#define pass(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_pass(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define skip(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_skip(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
+
#define PATTERN 0x55
static const int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
@@ -332,3 +334,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
ksft_finished();
}
+
+#else /* __NR_memfd_secret */
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ printf("skip: skipping memfd_secret test (missing __NR_memfd_secret)\n");
+ return KSFT_SKIP;
+}
+
+#endif /* __NR_memfd_secret */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mkdirty.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mkdirty.c
index af2fce496912..09feeb453646 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mkdirty.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mkdirty.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
*/
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ static void test_pte_mapped_thp(void)
munmap(mmap_mem, mmap_size);
}
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
static void test_uffdio_copy(void)
{
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
@@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ static void test_uffdio_copy(void)
munmap(dst, pagesize);
free(src);
}
+#endif /* __NR_userfaultfd */
int main(void)
{
@@ -334,7 +336,9 @@ int main(void)
thpsize / 1024);
tests += 3;
}
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
tests += 1;
+#endif /* __NR_userfaultfd */
ksft_print_header();
ksft_set_plan(tests);
@@ -364,7 +368,9 @@ int main(void)
if (thpsize)
test_pte_mapped_thp();
/* Placing a fresh page via userfaultfd may set the PTE dirty. */
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
test_uffdio_copy();
+#endif /* __NR_userfaultfd */
err = ksft_get_fail_cnt();
if (err)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2.h
index 1e5731bab499..4417eaa5cfb7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock2.h
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
static int mlock2_(void *start, size_t len, int flags)
{
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
index a4683f2476f2..35565af308af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
index 717539eddf98..7ad6ba660c7d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
@@ -673,7 +673,11 @@ int uffd_open_dev(unsigned int flags)
int uffd_open_sys(unsigned int flags)
{
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
return syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, flags);
+#else
+ return -1;
+#endif
}
int uffd_open(unsigned int flags)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c
index a4b83280998a..944d559ade21 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c
@@ -33,10 +33,11 @@
* pthread_mutex_lock will also verify the atomicity of the memory
* transfer (UFFDIO_COPY).
*/
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
+
#include "uffd-common.h"
uint64_t features;
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
#define BOUNCE_RANDOM (1<<0)
#define BOUNCE_RACINGFAULTS (1<<1)
@@ -471,3 +472,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
nr_pages, nr_pages_per_cpu);
return userfaultfd_stress();
}
+
+#else /* __NR_userfaultfd */
+
+#warning "missing __NR_userfaultfd definition"
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ printf("skip: Skipping userfaultfd test (missing __NR_userfaultfd)\n");
+ return KSFT_SKIP;
+}
+
+#endif /* __NR_userfaultfd */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
index 9ff71fa1f9bf..74c8bc02b506 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
@@ -5,11 +5,12 @@
* Copyright (C) 2015-2023 Red Hat, Inc.
*/
-#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
#include "uffd-common.h"
#include "../../../../mm/gup_test.h"
+#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
+
/* The unit test doesn't need a large or random size, make it 32MB for now */
#define UFFD_TEST_MEM_SIZE (32UL << 20)
@@ -1558,3 +1559,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
return ksft_get_fail_cnt() ? KSFT_FAIL : KSFT_PASS;
}
+#else /* __NR_userfaultfd */
+
+#warning "missing __NR_userfaultfd definition"
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ printf("Skipping %s (missing __NR_userfaultfd)\n", __file__);
+ return KSFT_SKIP;
+}
+
+#endif /* __NR_userfaultfd */
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-14 2:30 [PATCH v2 0/6] cleanups, fixes, and progress towards avoiding "make headers" John Hubbard
2024-06-14 2:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] selftests/mm: mseal, self_elf: fix missing __NR_mseal John Hubbard
2024-06-14 12:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14 12:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14 18:02 ` John Hubbard
2024-06-17 18:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-18 1:52 ` John Hubbard
2024-06-14 2:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] selftests/mm: mseal, self_elf: factor out test macros and other duplicated items John Hubbard
2024-06-14 12:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14 14:56 ` Jeff Xu
2024-06-14 2:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] selftests/mm: mseal, self_elf: rename TEST_END_CHECK to REPORT_TEST_PASS John Hubbard
2024-06-14 12:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14 2:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] selftests/mm: fix vm_util.c build failures: add snapshot of fs.h John Hubbard
2024-06-14 12:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-14 2:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests/mm: kvm, mdwe fixes to avoid requiring "make headers" John Hubbard
2024-06-14 12:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-15 0:09 ` John Hubbard
2024-06-14 2:30 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests/mm: remove local __NR_* definitions John Hubbard
2024-06-14 12:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-12 20:34 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-12 22:31 ` John Hubbard
2025-02-13 11:32 ` Li Wang
2025-02-13 20:47 ` John Hubbard
2025-02-13 8:04 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2025-02-13 15:00 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76770ce2-f6a6-4af0-b29c-0070933a1dfb@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@google.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox