linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, npiggin@suse.de, npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: zijun_hu@htc.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	tj@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/vmalloc.c: correct lazy_max_pages() return value
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:30:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7671e782-b58f-7c41-b132-c7ebbcf61b99@zoho.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160922123736.GA11204@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 2016/9/22 20:37, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-09-16 09:13:50, zijun_hu wrote:
>> On 09/22/2016 08:35 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> [...]
>>> The intent is as it is implemented; with your change, lazy_max_pages() is 
>>> potentially increased depending on the number of online cpus.  This is 
>>> only a heuristic, changing it would need justification on why the new
>>> value is better.  It is opposite to what the comment says: "to be 
>>> conservative and not introduce a big latency on huge systems, so go with
>>> a less aggressive log scale."  NACK to the patch.
>>>
>> my change potentially make lazy_max_pages() decreased not increased, i seems
>> conform with the comment
>>
>> if the number of online CPUs is not power of 2, both have no any difference
>> otherwise, my change remain power of 2 value, and the original code rounds up
>> to next power of 2 value, for instance
>>
>> my change : (32, 64] -> 64
>> 	     32 -> 32, 64 -> 64
>> the original code: [32, 63) -> 64
>>                    32 -> 64, 64 -> 128
> 
> You still completely failed to explain _why_ this is an improvement/fix
> or why it matters. This all should be in the changelog.
> 

Hi npiggin,
could you give some comments for this patch since lazy_max_pages() is introduced
by you

my patch is based on the difference between fls() and get_count_order() mainly
the difference between fls() and get_count_order() will be shown below
more MM experts maybe help to decide which is more suitable

if parameter > 1, both have different return value only when parameter is
power of two, for example

fls(32) = 6 VS get_count_order(32) = 5
fls(33) = 6 VS get_count_order(33) = 6
fls(63) = 6 VS get_count_order(63) = 6
fls(64) = 7 VS get_count_order(64) = 6

@@ -594,7 +594,9 @@ static unsigned long lazy_max_pages(void) 
{ 
    unsigned int log; 

-    log = fls(num_online_cpus()); 
+    log = num_online_cpus(); 
+    if (log > 1) 
+        log = (unsigned int)get_count_order(log); 

    return log * (32UL * 1024 * 1024 / PAGE_SIZE); 
} 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-22 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-21  4:27 zijun_hu
2016-09-21 21:21 ` David Rientjes
2016-09-21 23:30   ` zijun_hu
2016-09-22  0:35     ` David Rientjes
2016-09-22  1:13       ` zijun_hu
2016-09-22 12:37         ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-22 16:30           ` zijun_hu [this message]
2016-09-23  3:30             ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-23  5:00               ` zijun_hu
2016-09-23  7:27                 ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7671e782-b58f-7c41-b132-c7ebbcf61b99@zoho.com \
    --to=zijun_hu@zoho.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zijun_hu@htc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox