linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	 Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	 Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
	Chengming Zhou	 <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
		pratmal@google.com, sweettea@google.com, gthelen@google.com,
	weixugc@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: ghost swapfile support for zswap
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:52:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7665130c511e3cd00f83e8b14de2b78e08830887.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACePvbXstKtQXE+0i-KRcq5LwrCr92a_FKy2KBmqaiwZEkFxng@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2025-11-26 at 23:22 +0400, Chris Li wrote:
> 
> That being said, I think I have answered enough technical questions
> of
> my approach, to let you re-consider my proposal. You should be able
> to
> realize by now my approach is more optimal compared to VS. Do you
> agree or not? We are just arguing how big the gap that is.
> 

We would have much more confidence in your
solution if you had told us exactly how
you were planning to solve things in future
stages of the project.

A "I'll solve it, but I can't tell you how"
is not very confidence inspiring.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-26 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21  9:31 Chris Li
2025-11-21 10:19 ` Nhat Pham
2025-11-22  1:52   ` Chris Li
2025-11-24 14:47     ` Nhat Pham
2025-11-25 18:26       ` Chris Li
2025-11-21 11:40 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-11-22  1:52   ` Chris Li
2025-11-22 10:29     ` Kairui Song
2025-11-24 15:35     ` Nhat Pham
2025-11-24 16:14     ` Rik van Riel
2025-11-24 17:26       ` Chris Li
2025-11-24 17:42         ` Rik van Riel
2025-11-24 17:58           ` Chris Li
2025-11-24 17:27     ` Johannes Weiner
2025-11-24 18:24       ` Chris Li
2025-11-24 19:32         ` Johannes Weiner
2025-11-25 19:27           ` Chris Li
2025-11-25 21:31             ` Johannes Weiner
2025-11-26 19:22               ` Chris Li
2025-11-26 21:52                 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2025-11-27  1:52                   ` Chris Li
2025-11-27  2:26                     ` Rik van Riel
2025-11-27 19:09                       ` Chris Li
2025-11-28 20:46                         ` Nhat Pham
2025-11-29 20:38                           ` Chris Li
2025-12-01 16:43                             ` Johannes Weiner
2025-12-01 19:49                               ` Kairui Song
2025-12-02 17:02                                 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-12-02 20:48                                   ` Chris Li
2025-12-01 20:21                               ` Barry Song
2025-12-02 19:58                               ` Chris Li
2025-12-01 23:37                             ` Nhat Pham
2025-12-02 19:18                               ` Chris Li
2025-12-02 18:18               ` Nhat Pham
2025-12-02 21:07                 ` Chris Li
2025-11-24 19:32       ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-24 20:24         ` Nhat Pham
2025-11-25 18:50         ` Chris Li
2025-11-26 21:58           ` Rik van Riel
2025-11-27  2:07             ` Chris Li
2025-11-27  2:34               ` Rik van Riel
2025-11-25 18:14     ` Chris Li
2025-11-25 18:55       ` Johannes Weiner
2025-11-21 15:14 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-22  1:52   ` Chris Li
2025-11-24 14:57     ` Nhat Pham
2025-11-22  9:59 ` Kairui Song
2025-11-22 13:58   ` Baoquan He
2025-12-02  2:56   ` Barry Song
2025-12-02  6:31     ` Baoquan He
2025-12-02 17:53       ` Nhat Pham
2025-12-02 21:01         ` Chris Li
2025-12-03  8:37 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-12-03 20:02   ` Chris Li
2025-12-04  6:16     ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-12-04 10:11       ` Chris Li
2025-12-04 20:55         ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-12-05  8:56           ` Kairui Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7665130c511e3cd00f83e8b14de2b78e08830887.camel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=pratmal@google.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=sweettea@google.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox