linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER
	MANAGEM..." <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Bard Liao <bard.liao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 3956/5128] sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-codec.c:132:35: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES'
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:48:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7631ac5e-c1c4-9051-ee7a-985ed02183e5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2112031605380.3554566@eliteleevi.tm.intel.com>



On 12/3/21 8:07 AM, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> 
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
>>>    127		do {
>>>    128			mutex_lock(&hbus->core.cmd_mutex);
>>>    129			snd_hdac_bus_send_cmd(&hbus->core, hda_cmd);
>>>    130			snd_hdac_bus_get_response(&hbus->core, address, &resp);
>>>    131			mutex_unlock(&hbus->core.cmd_mutex);
>>>  > 132		} while (resp == -1 && retry++ < CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES);
>>
>> Indeed, something's not right here.
>>
>> CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES is defined conditionally
>>
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_HDA_AUDIO_CODEC)
>> #define IDISP_VID_INTEL	0x80860000
>> #define CODEC_PROBE_RETRIES 3
>>
>> but it's used unconditionally.
> 
> yup, the definition needs to be moved out.
> 
>> We could define this constant unconditionally as a quick fix, but this
>> compilation problem might expose a larger problem.
>>
>> Kai, I wonder if this is code from lines 120 to 139 that we didn't
>> update when we moved to support HDMI with the generic HDaudio parts? I
>> don't see why we could even try to send a command on the bus is there's
>> no audio codec support?
>>
>> hda_codec_use_common_hdmi should be the default assumption now, I don't
>> think we support the old solution, do we?
> 
> We do still support the hdac-hdmi as well, albeit only for select old
> hardware to maintain backwards compatibility.

Would it be a major risk to drop this compatibility, possibly in steps
that can be reverted quickly? Maintaining this old HDMI-specific path
isn't really sustainable.

> I'll send the quick fix.

Thanks!


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03 11:25 kernel test robot
2021-12-03 14:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-12-03 14:07   ` Kai Vehmanen
2021-12-03 14:48     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2021-12-03 15:01     ` Hui Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7631ac5e-c1c4-9051-ee7a-985ed02183e5@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox