linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jane.chu@oracle.com
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	syzbot <syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in memory_failure
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:49:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7577871f-06be-492d-b6d7-8404d7a045e0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <594350a0-f35d-472b-9261-96ce2715d402@oracle.com>


On 9/29/2025 10:29 AM, jane.chu@oracle.com wrote:
> 
> On 9/29/2025 4:08 AM, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to change all the split functions in huge_mm.h and provide
>>> mapping_min_folio_order() to try_folio_split() in 
>>> truncate_inode_partial_folio().
>>>
>>> Something like below:
>>>
>>> 1. no split function will change the given order;
>>> 2. __folio_split() will no longer give VM_WARN_ONCE when provided 
>>> new_order
>>> is smaller than mapping_min_folio_order().
>>>
>>> In this way, for an LBS folio that cannot be split to order 0, split
>>> functions will return -EINVAL to tell caller that the folio cannot
>>> be split. The caller is supposed to handle the split failure.
>>
>> IIUC, we will remove warn on once but just return -EINVAL in 
>> __folio_split()
>> function if new_order < min_order like this:
>> ...
>>         min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
>>         if (new_order < min_order) {
>> -            VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split mapped folio below min- 
>> order: %u",
>> -                     min_order);
>>             ret = -EINVAL;
>>             goto out;
>>         }
>> ...
> 
> Then the user process will get a SIGBUS indicting the entire huge page 
> at higher order -
>                  folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
>                  if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
>                          res = -EHWPOISON;
>                          kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
>                          put_page(p);
>                          action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_UNSPLIT_THP, MF_FAILED);
>                          goto unlock_mutex;
>                  }
>                  VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
>                  folio = page_folio(p);
> 
> the huge page is not usable any way, kind of similar to the hugetlb page 
> situation: since the page cannot be splitted, the entire page is marked 
> unusable.
> 
> How about keep the current huge page split code as is, but change the M- 
> F code to recognize that in a successful splitting case, the poisoned 
> page might just be in a lower folio order, and thus, deliver the SIGBUS ?
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index a24806bb8e82..342c81edcdd9 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2291,7 +2291,9 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>                   * page is a valid handlable page.
>                   */
>                  folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
> -               if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
> +               ret = try_to_split_thp_page(p, false);
> +               folio = page_folio(p);
> +               if (ret < 0 || folio_test_large(folio)) {
>                          res = -EHWPOISON;
>                          kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
>                          put_page(p);
> @@ -2299,7 +2301,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>                          goto unlock_mutex;
>                  }
>                  VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
> -               folio = page_folio(p);
>          }
> 
> thanks,
> -jane

Maybe this is better, in case there are other reason for 
split_huge_page() to return -EINVAL.

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index a24806bb8e82..2bfa05acae65 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1659,9 +1659,10 @@ static int identify_page_state(unsigned long pfn, 
struct page *p,
  static int try_to_split_thp_page(struct page *page, bool release)
  {
         int ret;
+       int new_order = min_order_for_split(page_folio(page));

         lock_page(page);
-       ret = split_huge_page(page);
+       ret = split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, new_order);
         unlock_page(page);

         if (ret && release)
@@ -2277,6 +2278,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
         folio_unlock(folio);

         if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
+               int ret;
                 /*
                  * The flag must be set after the refcount is bumped
                  * otherwise it may race with THP split.
@@ -2291,7 +2293,9 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
                  * page is a valid handlable page.
                  */
                 folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
-               if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
+               ret = try_to_split_thp_page(p, false);
+               folio = page_folio(p);
+               if (ret < 0 || folio_test_large(folio)) {
                         res = -EHWPOISON;
                         kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
                         put_page(p);
@@ -2299,7 +2303,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
                         goto unlock_mutex;
                 }
                 VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
-               folio = page_folio(p);
         }

         /*
@@ -2618,7 +2621,8 @@ static int soft_offline_in_use_page(struct page *page)
         };

         if (!huge && folio_test_large(folio)) {
-               if (try_to_split_thp_page(page, true)) {
+               if ((try_to_split_thp_page(page, true)) ||
+                       folio_test_large(page_folio(page))) {
                         pr_info("%#lx: thp split failed\n", pfn);
                         return -EBUSY;
                 }


thanks,
-jane



  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-29 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 16:22 syzbot
2025-09-24 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 15:03   ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 15:35     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 16:33       ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 17:05         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24 17:52           ` Zi Yan
2025-09-25 12:02             ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2025-09-25 14:24               ` Zi Yan
2025-09-25 16:23                 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-25 16:48                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 17:26                     ` Yang Shi
2025-09-29 11:08                 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2025-09-29 15:20                   ` Zi Yan
2025-09-29 16:13                     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-01  1:51                     ` Zi Yan
2025-10-01  2:06                       ` syzbot
2025-10-01  2:13                       ` Zi Yan
2025-10-01  4:51                         ` syzbot
2025-10-01 23:58                           ` jane.chu
2025-10-02  0:38                             ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02  2:04                               ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02  2:50                                 ` syzbot
2025-10-02  5:23                                 ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 13:54                                   ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 17:47                                     ` jane.chu
2025-10-09  7:39                                       ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-10 15:25                                         ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 17:54                                     ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 18:45                                       ` Zi Yan
2025-10-03  4:02                                         ` jane.chu
2025-10-02 18:33                                   ` Zi Yan
2025-10-02 19:09                                     ` syzbot
2025-10-02  7:25                             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-29 17:29                   ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 17:49                     ` jane.chu [this message]
2025-09-29 18:23                       ` jane.chu
2025-09-29 20:15                         ` Zi Yan
2025-09-29 20:52                           ` jane.chu
2025-09-30  2:51                         ` Miaohe Lin
2025-09-30  4:35                           ` jane.chu
2025-09-30  6:31                             ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-01 18:15                               ` jane.chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7577871f-06be-492d-b6d7-8404d7a045e0@oracle.com \
    --to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox