linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
	jgross@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm/hotplug: Only respect mem= parameter during boot stage
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 20:24:55 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75188d0f-c609-5417-aa2e-354e76b7ba6e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210084413.21957-1-bhe@redhat.com>



On 10/12/19 7:44 pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> In commit 357b4da50a62 ("x86: respect memory size limiting via mem=
> parameter") a global varialbe global max_mem_size is added to store
                  typo ^^^
> the value parsed from 'mem= ', then checked when memory region is
> added. This truly stops those DIMM from being added into system memory
> during boot-time.
> 
> However, it also limits the later memory hotplug functionality. Any
> memory board can't be hot added any more if its region is beyond the
> max_mem_size. System will print error like below:
> 
> [  216.387164] acpi PNP0C80:02: add_memory failed
> [  216.389301] acpi PNP0C80:02: acpi_memory_enable_device() error
> [  216.392187] acpi PNP0C80:02: Enumeration failure
> 
> From document of 'mem= ' parameter, it should be a restriction during
> boot, but not impact the system memory adding/removing after booting.
> 
>   mem=nn[KMG]     [KNL,BOOT] Force usage of a specific amount of memory
> 	          ...
> 
> So fix it by also checking if it's during boot-time when restrict memory
> adding. Otherwise, skip the restriction.
> 

The fix looks reasonable, but I don't get the use case. Booting with mem= is
generally a debug option, is this for debugging memory hotplug + limited memory?

Balbir


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-10  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-10  8:44 Baoquan He
2019-12-10  9:07 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-12-10  9:24 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2019-12-10  9:34   ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10  9:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10  9:37     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-10  9:41       ` Balbir Singh
2019-12-10  9:50     ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10 10:11       ` Baoquan He
2019-12-10 10:21         ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-10  9:32 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75188d0f-c609-5417-aa2e-354e76b7ba6e@gmail.com \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox