Re: [PATCH] mm/madvise: Use vma_lookup() instead of find_vma()

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 11.03.22 09:27, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Using vma_lookup() verifies the start address is contained in the found
> vma. This results in easier to read the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/madvise.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 5b6d796e55de..afd68bfc77d4 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -883,8 +883,8 @@ static long madvise_populate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		 * our VMA might have been split.
>  		 */
>  		if (!vma || start >= vma->vm_end) {
> -			vma = find_vma(mm, start);
> -			if (!vma || start < vma->vm_start)
> +			vma = vma_lookup(mm, start);
> +			if (!vma)
>  				return -ENOMEM;
>  		}
>  

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb