From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f71.google.com (mail-pl0-f71.google.com [209.85.160.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE656B0007 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:40:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f71.google.com with SMTP id d9-v6so3856232plj.4 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out4438.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out4438.biz.mail.alibaba.com. [47.88.44.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x7si3883498pge.559.2018.04.19.16.40.43 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:40:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Yang Shi Subject: [LSF/MM] May I sneak in a new topic to MM track? Message-ID: <72f799d6-2b50-3185-888f-48438d33f817@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:40:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, Rik van Riel Hi folks, I posted a patch series about mmap_sem scalability (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/20/786), and got a lot great feedback. I'm working on v2 now (a little bit behind).A Could we sneak this in if anyone is interested? I saw Laurent has a topic about mmap_sem too, I'm supposed it is speculative page fault related. Thanks, Yang