linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, toshi.kani@hp.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: fix kfree() of bootmem memory
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:19:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <72ae5d5b-512e-4dd4-4bb0-d867fb788f60@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <828c9b16-6ff0-abb7-3a16-277d2d60de81@huawei.com>

On 08.02.22 02:59, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Hi:
> On 2022/2/7 22:33, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 07.02.22 14:56, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> We can't use kfree() to release the resource as it might come from bootmem.
>>> Use release_mem_region() instead.
>>
>> How can this happen? release_mem_region() is called either from
>> __add_memory() or from add_memory_driver_managed(), where we allocated
>> the region via register_memory_resource(). Both functions shouldn't ever
>> be called before the buddy is up an running.
>>
>> Do you have a backtrace of an actual instance of this issue? Or was this
>> identified as possibly broken by code inspection?
>>
> 
> This is identified as possibly broken by code inspection. IIUC, alloc_resource
> is always used to allocate the resource. It has the below logic:
> 
>   if (bootmem_resource_free) {
> 	res = bootmem_resource_free;
> 	bootmem_resource_free = res->sibling;
>   }
> 
> where bootmem_resource_free is used to reusing the resource entries allocated by boot
> mem after the system is up:
> 
> /*
>  * For memory hotplug, there is no way to free resource entries allocated
>  * by boot mem after the system is up. So for reusing the resource entry
>  * we need to remember the resource.
>  */
> static struct resource *bootmem_resource_free;
> 
> So I think register_memory_resource() can reuse the resource allocated by bootmem.
> Or am I miss anything?

I think you're right, if we did a previous free_resource() of a resource allocated
during boot we could end up reusing that here. My best guess is that this never
really happens.

Wow, that's ugly. It affects essentially anybody reserving+freeing a resource.

E.g., dax/kmem.c similarly does a release_resource(res)+kfree(res)


We could either

a) Expose free_resource() and replace all kfree(res) instances by it

b) Just simplify that. I don't think we care about saving a couple of 
   bytes in corner cases. I might be wrong (IIRC primarily ppc64 really 
   succeeds in unplugging boot memory)


diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 9c08d6e9eef2..fe91a72fd951 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -56,14 +56,6 @@ struct resource_constraint {
 
 static DEFINE_RWLOCK(resource_lock);
 
-/*
- * For memory hotplug, there is no way to free resource entries allocated
- * by boot mem after the system is up. So for reusing the resource entry
- * we need to remember the resource.
- */
-static struct resource *bootmem_resource_free;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bootmem_resource_lock);
-
 static struct resource *next_resource(struct resource *p)
 {
        if (p->child)
@@ -160,36 +152,19 @@ __initcall(ioresources_init);
 
 static void free_resource(struct resource *res)
 {
-       if (!res)
-               return;
-
-       if (!PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res))) {
-               spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
-               res->sibling = bootmem_resource_free;
-               bootmem_resource_free = res;
-               spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
-       } else {
+       /*
+        * If the resource was allocated using memblock early during boot
+        * we'll leak it here: we can only return full pages back to the
+        * buddy and trying to be smart and reusing them eventually in
+        * alloc_resource() overcomplicates resource handling.
+        */
+       if (res && PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res)))
                kfree(res);
-       }
 }
 
 static struct resource *alloc_resource(gfp_t flags)
 {
-       struct resource *res = NULL;
-
-       spin_lock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
-       if (bootmem_resource_free) {
-               res = bootmem_resource_free;
-               bootmem_resource_free = res->sibling;
-       }
-       spin_unlock(&bootmem_resource_lock);
-
-       if (res)
-               memset(res, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
-       else
-               res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
-
-       return res;
+       return kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), flags);
 }
 
 /* Return the conflict entry if you can't request it */


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 13:56 Miaohe Lin
2022-02-07 14:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-02-08  1:59   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-02-08  9:19     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-02-08 11:20       ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=72ae5d5b-512e-4dd4-4bb0-d867fb788f60@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox