From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
rppt@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, horms@verge.net.au,
takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:43:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72a9c52b-1b24-57e8-e29f-b5a53524744b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <638a5d22-8d51-8d63-2d8a-a38bbb8fb1d6@huawei.com>
Hi Chen Zhou,
On 13/06/2019 12:27, Chen Zhou wrote:
> On 2019/6/6 0:32, James Morse wrote:
>> On 07/05/2019 04:50, Chen Zhou wrote:
>>> We use crashkernel=X to reserve crashkernel below 4G, which will fail
>>> when there is no enough memory. Currently, crashkernel=Y@X can be used
>>> to reserve crashkernel above 4G, in this case, if swiotlb or DMA buffers
>>> are requierd, capture kernel will boot failure because of no low memory.
>>
>>> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, kernel should reserve
>>> some amount of low memory for swiotlb and some DMA buffers. So there may
>>> be two crash kernel regions, one is below 4G, the other is above 4G.
>>
>> This is a good argument for supporting the 'crashkernel=...,low' version.
>> What is the 'crashkernel=...,high' version for?
>>
>> Wouldn't it be simpler to relax the ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT if we see 'crashkernel=...,low'
>> in the kernel cmdline?
>>
>> I don't see what the 'crashkernel=...,high' variant is giving us, it just complicates the
>> flow of reserve_crashkernel().
>>
>> If we called reserve_crashkernel_low() at the beginning of reserve_crashkernel() we could
>> use crashk_low_res.end to change some limit variable from ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT to
>> memblock_end_of_DRAM().
>> I think this is a simpler change that gives you what you want.
>
> According to your suggestions, we should do like this:
> 1. call reserve_crashkernel_low() at the beginning of reserve_crashkernel()
> 2. mark the low region as 'nomap'
> 3. use crashk_low_res.end to change some limit variable from ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT to
> memblock_end_of_DRAM()
> 4. rename crashk_low_res as "Crash kernel (low)" for arm64
> 5. add an 'linux,low-memory-range' node in DT
(This bit would happen in kexec-tools)
> Do i understand correctly?
Yes, I think this is simpler and still gives you what you want.
It also leaves the existing behaviour unchanged, which helps with keeping compatibility
with existing user-space and older kdump kernels.
Thanks,
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-07 3:50 Chen Zhou
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c Chen Zhou
2019-06-05 16:29 ` James Morse
2019-06-13 11:26 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-12 8:45 ` Dave Young
2019-06-13 11:27 ` Chen Zhou
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G Chen Zhou
2019-06-05 16:29 ` James Morse
2019-06-13 11:27 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-13 12:44 ` James Morse
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] memblock: extend memblock_cap_memory_range to multiple ranges Chen Zhou
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64 Chen Zhou
2019-05-15 5:16 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2019-05-16 3:23 ` Chen Zhou
2019-05-15 5:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Bhupesh Sharma
2019-05-16 3:19 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-03 2:24 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-05 16:32 ` James Morse
2019-06-13 11:27 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-13 12:43 ` James Morse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72a9c52b-1b24-57e8-e29f-b5a53524744b@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenzhou10@huawei.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox