linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com,
	shy828301@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to skip redundant TLB sync IPIs
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 21:31:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <725b85bf-ff5e-45d6-991e-d92598779f98@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251229145245.85452-2-lance.yang@linux.dev>

On 12/29/25 15:52, Lance Yang wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> 
> When unsharing hugetlb PMD page tables, we currently send two IPIs: one
> for TLB invalidation, and another to synchronize with concurrent GUP-fast
> walkers.
> 
> However, if the TLB flush already reaches all CPUs, the second IPI is
> redundant. GUP-fast runs with IRQs disabled, so when the TLB flush IPI
> completes, any concurrent GUP-fast must have finished.
> 
> Add tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() to let architectures indicate
> their TLB flush provides full synchronization, enabling the redundant IPI
> to be skipped.
> 
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> ---
>   include/asm-generic/tlb.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> index 4d679d2a206b..e8d99b5e831f 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,20 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void) { }
>   
>   #endif /* CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
>   
> +/*
> + * Architectures can override if their TLB flush already broadcasts IPIs to all
> + * CPUs when freeing or unsharing page tables.
> + *
> + * Return true only when the flush guarantees:
> + * - IPIs reach all CPUs with potentially stale paging-structure cache entries
> + * - Synchronization with IRQ-disabled code like GUP-fast
> + */
> +#ifndef tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast
> +static inline bool tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(void)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
>   
>   #ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
>   /*


This should likely get squashed into patch #3. Patch #1 itself does not 
add a lot of value to be had separately.

So best to squash both and have them as #1, to then implement it in #2 
for x86.

-- 
Cheers

David


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-30 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-29 14:52 [PATCH v2 0/3] " Lance Yang
2025-12-29 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to " Lance Yang
2025-12-29 15:00   ` Lance Yang
2025-12-29 15:01     ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Lance Yang
2025-12-30 20:31   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-12-31  2:29     ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to " Lance Yang
2025-12-29 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for page table operations Lance Yang
2025-12-29 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: embed TLB flush IPI check in tlb_remove_table_sync_one() Lance Yang
2025-12-30 20:33   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-31  3:03     ` Lance Yang
2025-12-31  4:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] skip redundant TLB sync IPIs Dave Hansen
2025-12-31 12:33   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=725b85bf-ff5e-45d6-991e-d92598779f98@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox