From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00592C5AD49 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 20:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 911306B0201; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:37:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8E92C6B0202; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:37:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7D72E6B0203; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:37:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF356B0201 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:37:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E841C8722 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 20:37:09 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83500733820.13.1C6E15A Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F675140003 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 20:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eZgO6oOR; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1748637427; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=LoFhHwna4DNpF+0tUacKnGF67Gq6Vrdi1+MZRGnB0wk=; b=sBRY6dVAOVX84pwhKGtbsy9tv6xaJ0NVeJJBeLDrPBLbyUR/gj+wv+qfkkOlgWRYCVged/ k8bDi5mHDh83ennkP+J3xLrgrp540a2u3b46DbJBohvLqjQnqNYSMb7viEphTD56K/tlIp Hq3ZwkBTX41UsbioBFqqm+wR3x+3/v8= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1748637427; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tYgtk7mRfbHcHjsg02LlFHq5a/UCEiemBRutM3AekTImFGe0SfUUBrqXPNLzUDuf/Tg8wa y59f59/V/iYCq8/a8dyTUqP2FGXGaoNzr3OdulatrtUGbIAIZfMViTTpGrfJ8zvUWCMlrz RMm7xBrbv4L2dweB2D2vfLm6v8FzIzU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eZgO6oOR; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1748637426; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=LoFhHwna4DNpF+0tUacKnGF67Gq6Vrdi1+MZRGnB0wk=; b=eZgO6oORQyKVBEFXvJBW4QXPdZkH91CN7B2BcceeTfvvlMbPRcrjfusAXjEuNsU1tsgm3b pmfdSVwm3nd/b0wQ5HysY4nISFgz+4qUnr1xV9tAIkXA6Hd7gJ6xi/9UUXgLgE31ZcmsyH MNZvMtHgF8+2u2R2fpFWVEaPOUWQUEQ= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-558-1ybAe9X_PJyKCcis0KGDoA-1; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:37:03 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1ybAe9X_PJyKCcis0KGDoA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 1ybAe9X_PJyKCcis0KGDoA_1748637422 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d0830c3f7so20429335e9.2 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 13:37:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748637422; x=1749242222; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LoFhHwna4DNpF+0tUacKnGF67Gq6Vrdi1+MZRGnB0wk=; b=JDWZBoMxlEsRo2/VvxU3Jg0DtEq5n0mMTc1c2ABIQeQLYDWH41B3gH7Gs67BkOmN/P 9eS/7G+V5KJuaA0O6rLWSW9r3pa414byUx1FJzjG1l/3uW9Wm6nu6gZfH3JGdWbKIEpf +lcfgj4+M0hz5fT1zcAmQu87RtVSB8YJUjkH4HYTulSX/ZAWTU9q93ka9lDrv+TODGre cRQHU3N9dW3e/O6fCBiHCN/SZcy/21HYfTaCE/oUYnAR3wLm/qFJxh6z5kFhHwn5T9LR nFQcnGhCVvj+hBtkChWUKcnsxgOplad7+CpS2r/GCVZLlb+GXFvitWlwgfZZZEHtiWN4 CZUA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVovqXjaJXkLX4zq2PQkE6j1CLTJ6onEd7jiiVHP7Um9HNsU4uu9X/20Metqo2yUeh4+jmL/9Hyvw==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyDlH99GGBC4NDoEuXSHw0vqyiExpcs45zeFFUrW1wDeuc63Ifz o/G8cEy5tnU5DfCktIrdSmRfqXKUAm2lpeEGNvmYz8mNWJx8dUDBjp2jhcoWMfF9IMMCzZIclHP cf3MmlWZUokBm4lvgZsDxQo2KQHfbkwLd4d/Y6Si0/8FWtx+iWwAW9ZpwMVG8JLM= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsourKsM+7y/6AVgwqh46XoYwrtJnZVM+1phmmiXD2c1U9sAismy0TKh6G77gr yAbbhGPFFFz4N4EAVYy2ALaYGy3yl6u1wKK1HcwPtuHeiWL2lrz6HrV78vwB3hg2StOfLnDUc15 N6392gbULqZvh2zfNQ4tuva/OqlwqclMiAYtK33vEGpS8RbL59evqNNw+Vq/+//JhIlw4v15JQN j2FhS0N6BN6WXh2sHGwuLh9cVVxvD1yGJ858ZgIiLZPkAVDd43iiDGNuMSueJNn/5e2eDVvJgyR GHdYmBZfdsfVeqbaKvP0STdAMMp85d4LIF6egQKSEsCjXviYbq9260DvHAav7lRDBytFV1v78vk XCPChWupA3MVuEUUo32KTLVIRK6PZmhhLTRtWCKALqL1ifPySyw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d11:b0:441:b076:fce8 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-450d65382f3mr44763165e9.14.1748637422399; Fri, 30 May 2025 13:37:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHwnbQtZTBdkPV7rcjHwxokS1ZNELaKAdLMY/+erkv28q6aENuEvHuQ8PZywJC74WaTVeaKjw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d11:b0:441:b076:fce8 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-450d65382f3mr44763035e9.14.1748637422035; Fri, 30 May 2025 13:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:d8:2f03:5b00:f549:a879:b2d3:73ee? (p200300d82f035b00f549a879b2d373ee.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:d8:2f03:5b00:f549:a879:b2d3:73ee]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-450d7fc29f4sm26949415e9.38.2025.05.30.13.37.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 May 2025 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <722b084a-872b-4694-963d-241d00c63487@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 22:37:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] gup: optimize longterm pin_user_pages() for large folio To: lizhe.67@bytedance.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, jhubbard@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, peterx@redhat.com References: <6f5e3238-9750-40db-8fe1-88d28655a988@redhat.com> <20250530150254.52362-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20250530150254.52362-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: BkIZGm_Ag4wjhrsYicJzwXHy-cfC3SRyddESm2nYhhI_1748637422 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8F675140003 X-Stat-Signature: jqjh3p6rjrea9zq5qo9fiukkw6afpngc X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1748637427-209075 X-HE-Meta: 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 FFuNOMna 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 30.05.25 17:02, lizhe.67@bytedance.com wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:08:06 +0200, david@redhat.com wrote: > >>>>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c >>>>> index 84461d384ae2..8c11418036e2 100644 >>>>> --- a/mm/gup.c >>>>> +++ b/mm/gup.c >>>>> @@ -2317,6 +2317,25 @@ static void pofs_unpin(struct pages_or_folios *pofs) >>>>> unpin_user_pages(pofs->pages, pofs->nr_entries); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> +static struct folio *pofs_next_folio(struct folio *folio, >>>>> + struct pages_or_folios *pofs, long *index_ptr) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + long i = *index_ptr + 1; >>>>> + unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio); >>>>> + >>>>> + if (!pofs->has_folios) >>>>> + while ((i < pofs->nr_entries) && >>>>> + /* Is this page part of this folio? */ >>>>> + (folio_page_idx(folio, pofs->pages[i]) < nr_pages)) >>>> >>>> passing in a page that does not belong to the folio looks shaky and not >>>> future proof. >>>> >>>> folio_page() == folio >>>> >>>> is cleaner >>> >>> Yes, this approach is cleaner. However, when obtaining a folio >>> corresponding to a page through the page_folio() interface, >> >> Right, I meant page_folio(). >> >>> READ_ONCE() is used internally to read from memory, which results >>> in the performance of pin_user_pages() being worse than before. >> >> See contig_pages in [1] how it can be done using folio_page(). >> >> [1] >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250529064947.38433-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com/T/#u > > Thank you for your suggestion. It is indeed a good idea. I > initially thought along the same lines. However, I found that > the conditions for optimization here are slightly different > from those in contig_pages(). Here, it is only necessary to > ensure that the page is within the folio, rather than > requiring contiguity. Yes. > > I have made some preliminary attempts: using the method of > contig_pages() still gets an optimization effect of > approximately 73%. On the other hand, if we use the following > code to determine whether page_to_pfn(pofs->pages[i]) belongs > to the range > [folio_pfn(folio), folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio)), > the optimization effect is about 70%. I sincerely hope to > hear your thoughts on which solution you might favor. > > +static struct folio *pofs_next_folio(struct folio *folio, > + struct pages_or_folios *pofs, long *index_ptr) > +{ > + long i = *index_ptr + 1; > + > + if (!pofs->has_folios) { > + unsigned long start_pfn = folio_pfn(folio); > + unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + folio_nr_pages(folio); > + > + for (; i < pofs->nr_entries; i++) { > + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(pofs->pages[i]); > + > + /* Is this page part of this folio? */ > + if ((pfn < start_pfn) || (pfn >= end_pfn)) > + break; folio_page() is extremely efficient with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. I am not sure how efficient it will be in the future once "struct folio" is no longer an overlay of "struct page". page_to_pfn() should be slightly more expensive than folio_page() right now, but maybe more efficient in the future (maybe). I don't particularly care, whatever you prefer :) -- Cheers, David / dhildenb