From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5837FC433DF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C59207BB for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 13C59207BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id AB8808D000B; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:57:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A68708D0001; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:57:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 92FD08D000B; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:57:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0154.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.154]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3828D0001 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:57:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C1C8248076 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:57:39 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77166563838.08.drink62_030d7e927026 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D561819E798 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:57:38 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: drink62_030d7e927026 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1979 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85314101E; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.66.190] (unknown [10.163.66.190]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4051E3F6CF; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/pageblock: remove false sharing in pageblock_flags To: Alex Shi , Matthew Wilcox , David Hildenbrand Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Alexander Duyck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <1597816075-61091-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <1597816075-61091-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <715f1588-9cd5-b845-51a5-ca58549c4d28@arm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:27:04 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1597816075-61091-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D9D561819E798 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 08/19/2020 11:17 AM, Alex Shi wrote: > Current pageblock_flags is only 4 bits, so it has to share a char size > in cmpxchg when get set, the false sharing cause perf drop. > > If we incrase the bits up to 8, false sharing would gone in cmpxchg. and > the only cost is half char per pageblock, which is half char per 128MB > on x86, 4 chars in 1 GB. Agreed that increase in memory utilization is negligible here but does this really improve performance ?