From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: Log run_vmtests.sh results in TAP format
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:58:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71228821-cbd3-4a3c-9ed5-18f6d5ebcfc0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2296501-e9c9-4bc6-88ba-1e43ea083d4a@sirena.org.uk>
On 15/12/2023 13:54, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 04:24:34PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> When running tests on a CI system (e.g. LAVA) it is useful to output
>> test results in TAP format so that the CI can parse the fine-grained
>> results to show regressions. Many of the mm selftest binaries already
>> output using the TAP format. And the kselftests runner
>> (run_kselftest.sh) also uses the format. CI systems such as LAVA can
>> already handle nested TAP reports. However, with the mm selftests we
>> have 3 levels of nesting (run_kselftest.sh -> run_vmtests.sh ->
>> individual test binaries) and the middle level did not previously
>> support TAP, which breaks the parser.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Thanks!
>
>> Let's fix that by teaching run_vmtests.sh to output using the TAP
>> format. Ideally this would be opt-in via a command line argument to
>> avoid the possibility of breaking anyone's existing scripts that might
>> scrape the output. However, it is not possible to pass arguments to
>> tests invoked via run_kselftest.sh. So I've implemented an opt-out
>> option (-n), which will revert to the existing output format.
>
> What I did for ftrace which had a similar situation was make a wrapper
> script which invokes the test runner, make the test runner a
> TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED so it's not run by the kselftest infrastructure
> automatically and make the wrapper a normal TEST_PROGS. Neither option
> is especially lovely.
Yeah that's a good idea... I'll wait and see if anyone shouts that this has
broken something. If nothing is broken, I think it is better to just make TAP
the default rather than adding yet another wrapper.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-15 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-14 16:24 Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15 13:54 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-15 13:58 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2023-12-15 14:08 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-15 14:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-16 2:25 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-16 2:40 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-18 11:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-19 0:51 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-19 0:55 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-19 8:33 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71228821-cbd3-4a3c-9ed5-18f6d5ebcfc0@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox