linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@amd.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, kas@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, michael.roth@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/memory_hotplug: Add support to accept memory during hot-add
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 21:50:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70be936e-e49d-4485-8d1e-416fdf8f40a4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d07cbb96-ba30-4dcf-ad14-0479d6a989f2@kernel.org>



On 2/4/26 2:00 PM, David Hildenbrand (arm) wrote:
>>   #endif
>>     static inline bool pfn_is_unaccepted_memory(unsigned long pfn)
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index a63ec679d861..549ccfd190ee 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -1567,6 +1567,8 @@ int add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
>>       if (!strcmp(res->name, "System RAM"))
>>           firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size, "System RAM");
>>   +    accept_hotplug_memory(start, size);
>> +
>>       /* device_online() will take the lock when calling online_pages() */
>>       mem_hotplug_done();
>>   
> 
> I really hate that accepting (and un-accepting) hotplugged memory is different to accepting ordinary boot memory.
> 
> Is there really no way we can get a reasonable implementation where we just call a generic accept_memory() and it will know what to do?
> 

Sure, that shouldn't be impossible.

The only reason I initially kept them separate is because we accept and update
the bitmap unconditionally. This mainly applies to cold-plugged memory since
their bitmap state after remove shouldn't matter. However, as we are now
correctly setting the bits in the hot-remove path we should be fine accepting
from the for_each_set_bitrange_from() logic within accept_memory(), I think.

Something like so?

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
index d11e7836200a..e56adfd382f8 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
        unsigned long range_start, range_end;
        struct accept_range range, *entry;
        phys_addr_t end = start + size;
+       phys_addr_t bitmap_end;
        unsigned long flags;
        u64 unit_size;

@@ -44,6 +45,21 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
                return;

        unit_size = unaccepted->unit_size;
+       bitmap_end = unaccepted->phys_base + unaccepted->size * unit_size * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+
+       /* Memory completely beyond bitmap: hotplug memory, accept unconditionally */
+       if (start >= bitmap_end) {
+               arch_accept_memory(start, end);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       /* Memory partially beyond bitmap */
+       if (end > bitmap_end) {
+               arch_accept_memory(bitmap_end, end);
+               end = bitmap_end;
+       }

        /*
         * Only care for the part of the range that is represented

unaccept_hotplug_memory() truly doesn't do anything special for hotplug so I
could just re-name it unaccept_memory().

Thanks!



  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-03 17:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] SEV-SNP Unaccepted Memory Hotplug Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-03 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/memory_hotplug: Add support to accept memory during hot-add Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-04 11:22   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-04 19:59     ` David Hildenbrand (arm)
2026-02-05  3:50       ` Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-05 10:51         ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-04 20:00   ` David Hildenbrand (arm)
2026-02-05  3:50     ` Pratik R. Sampat [this message]
2026-02-05 10:48       ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-05 15:48         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 16:08           ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-05 17:29             ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-06 12:03               ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-16 14:45                 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-03 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/sev: Add support to unaccept memory after hot-remove Pratik R. Sampat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70be936e-e49d-4485-8d1e-416fdf8f40a4@amd.com \
    --to=prsampat@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox