From: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@amd.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, kas@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, michael.roth@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/memory_hotplug: Add support to accept memory during hot-add
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 21:50:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70be936e-e49d-4485-8d1e-416fdf8f40a4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d07cbb96-ba30-4dcf-ad14-0479d6a989f2@kernel.org>
On 2/4/26 2:00 PM, David Hildenbrand (arm) wrote:
>> #endif
>> static inline bool pfn_is_unaccepted_memory(unsigned long pfn)
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index a63ec679d861..549ccfd190ee 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -1567,6 +1567,8 @@ int add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
>> if (!strcmp(res->name, "System RAM"))
>> firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size, "System RAM");
>> + accept_hotplug_memory(start, size);
>> +
>> /* device_online() will take the lock when calling online_pages() */
>> mem_hotplug_done();
>>
>
> I really hate that accepting (and un-accepting) hotplugged memory is different to accepting ordinary boot memory.
>
> Is there really no way we can get a reasonable implementation where we just call a generic accept_memory() and it will know what to do?
>
Sure, that shouldn't be impossible.
The only reason I initially kept them separate is because we accept and update
the bitmap unconditionally. This mainly applies to cold-plugged memory since
their bitmap state after remove shouldn't matter. However, as we are now
correctly setting the bits in the hot-remove path we should be fine accepting
from the for_each_set_bitrange_from() logic within accept_memory(), I think.
Something like so?
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
index d11e7836200a..e56adfd382f8 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
unsigned long range_start, range_end;
struct accept_range range, *entry;
phys_addr_t end = start + size;
+ phys_addr_t bitmap_end;
unsigned long flags;
u64 unit_size;
@@ -44,6 +45,21 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
return;
unit_size = unaccepted->unit_size;
+ bitmap_end = unaccepted->phys_base + unaccepted->size * unit_size * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+
+ /* Memory completely beyond bitmap: hotplug memory, accept unconditionally */
+ if (start >= bitmap_end) {
+ arch_accept_memory(start, end);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Memory partially beyond bitmap */
+ if (end > bitmap_end) {
+ arch_accept_memory(bitmap_end, end);
+ end = bitmap_end;
+ }
/*
* Only care for the part of the range that is represented
unaccept_hotplug_memory() truly doesn't do anything special for hotplug so I
could just re-name it unaccept_memory().
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 17:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] SEV-SNP Unaccepted Memory Hotplug Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-03 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/memory_hotplug: Add support to accept memory during hot-add Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-04 11:22 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-04 19:59 ` David Hildenbrand (arm)
2026-02-05 3:50 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-05 10:51 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-04 20:00 ` David Hildenbrand (arm)
2026-02-05 3:50 ` Pratik R. Sampat [this message]
2026-02-05 10:48 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-05 15:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 16:08 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-05 17:29 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-06 12:03 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-02-16 14:45 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2026-02-03 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/sev: Add support to unaccept memory after hot-remove Pratik R. Sampat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70be936e-e49d-4485-8d1e-416fdf8f40a4@amd.com \
--to=prsampat@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox