From: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:40:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7099B4C7-311F-466D-B12C-BDC52FE34A65@konsulko.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76FFFF68-15F3-4A36-BF1D-A33CF36FDC9E@konsulko.se>
> On Jul 8, 2025, at 4:03 PM, Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 8, 2025, at 2:52 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/7/25 18:49, Vitaly Wool wrote:
>>> Reimplement k[v]realloc_node() to be able to set node and
>>> alignment should a user need to do so. In order to do that while
>>> retaining the maximal backward compatibility, add
>>> k[v]realloc_node_align() functions and redefine the rest of API
>>> using these new ones.
>>>
>>> With that change we also provide the ability for the Rust part of
>>> the kernel to set node and alignment in its K[v]xxx
>>> [re]allocations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/slab.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> mm/slub.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>>> index d5a8ab98035c..13abcf4ada22 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>>> @@ -465,9 +465,15 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s);
>>> /*
>>> * Common kmalloc functions provided by all allocators
>>> */
>>> -void * __must_check krealloc_noprof(const void *objp, size_t new_size,
>>> - gfp_t flags) __realloc_size(2);
>>> -#define krealloc(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> +void * __must_check krealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *objp, size_t new_size,
>>> + unsigned long align,
>>> + gfp_t flags, int nid) __realloc_size(2);
>>> +#define krealloc_node_noprof(_p, _s, _f, _n) \
>>> + krealloc_node_align_noprof(_p, _s, 1, _f, _n)
>>> +#define krealloc_noprof(...) krealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> +#define krealloc_node_align(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> +#define krealloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> +#define krealloc(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>
>> Hm wonder if krealloc() and krealloc_node_align() would be enough. Is
>> krealloc_node() only used between patch 3 and 4?
>> Also perhaps it would be more concise to only have
>> krealloc_node_align_noprof() with alloc_hooks wrappers filling the
>> NUMA_NO_NODE (and 1), so we don't need to #define the _noprof variant of
>> everything. The _noprof callers are rare so they can just always use
>> krealloc_node_align_noprof() directly and also fill in the NUMA_NO_NODE (and 1).
>
> I don’t think that krealloc_node() is used at all at the moment. I thought I’d define these to be symmetrical to vmalloc() but if you believe these are redundant, I’m all for removing them.
>
Well, krealloc_noprof() appears to be used by nommu.c and it feels a bit weird to make nommu code deal with NUMA nodes. So unless you feel strongly about it, I would keep krealloc_noprof().
~Vitaly
>>
>>> void kfree(const void *objp);
>>> void kfree_sensitive(const void *objp);
>>> @@ -1041,18 +1047,23 @@ static inline __alloc_size(1) void *kzalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>>> #define kzalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kzalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> #define kzalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node) kmalloc_node(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO, _node)
>>>
>>> -void *__kvmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), gfp_t flags, int node) __alloc_size(1);
>>> -#define kvmalloc_node_noprof(size, flags, node) \
>>> - __kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, NULL), flags, node)
>>> +void *__kvmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), unsigned long align,
>>> + gfp_t flags, int node) __alloc_size(1);
>>> +#define kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(_size, _align, _flags, _node) \
>>> + __kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, NULL), _align, _flags, _node)
>>> +#define kvmalloc_node_noprof(_size, _flags, _node) \
>>> + kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(_size, 1, _flags, _node)
>>> +#define kvmalloc_node_align(...) \
>>> + alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> #define kvmalloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>
>> Ditto.
>>
>>>
>>> -#define kvmalloc(_size, _flags) kvmalloc_node(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> -#define kvmalloc_noprof(_size, _flags) kvmalloc_node_noprof(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> +#define kvmalloc_noprof(...) kvmalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> +#define kvmalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> #define kvzalloc(_size, _flags) kvmalloc(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO)
>>>
>>> -#define kvzalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node) kvmalloc_node(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO, _node)
>>> +#define kvzalloc_node(_s, _f, _n) kvmalloc_node(_s, (_f)|__GFP_ZERO, _n)
>>> #define kmem_buckets_valloc(_b, _size, _flags) \
>>> - alloc_hooks(__kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, _b), _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE))
>>> + alloc_hooks(__kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, _b), 1, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE))
>>>
>>> static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *
>>> kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>>> @@ -1068,13 +1079,16 @@ kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>>> #define kvmalloc_array_noprof(...) kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> #define kvcalloc_node_noprof(_n,_s,_f,_node) kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(_n,_s,(_f)|__GFP_ZERO,_node)
>>> #define kvcalloc_noprof(...) kvcalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> -
>>> #define kvmalloc_array(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_array_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> #define kvcalloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvcalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> #define kvcalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvcalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>>
>>> -void *kvrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>>> - __realloc_size(2);
>>> +void *kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align,
>>> + gfp_t flags, int nid) __realloc_size(2);
>>> +#define kvrealloc_node_align(...) kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)
>>> +#define kvrealloc_node_noprof(_p, _s, _f, _n) kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(_p, _s, 1, _f, _n)
>>> +#define kvrealloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvrealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>> +#define kvrealloc_noprof(...) kvrealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> #define kvrealloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvrealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>>
>> Ditto.
>>
>>> extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
>>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>>> index c4b64821e680..881244c357dd 100644
>>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>>> @@ -4845,7 +4845,7 @@ void kfree(const void *object)
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree);
>>>
>>> static __always_inline __realloc_size(2) void *
>>> -__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
>>> +__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, unsigned long align, gfp_t flags, int nid)
>>> {
>>> void *ret;
>>> size_t ks = 0;
>>> @@ -4859,6 +4859,20 @@ __do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
>>> if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> + /* refuse to proceed if alignment is bigger than what kmalloc() provides */
>>> + if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)p, align) || new_size < align)
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If reallocation is not necessary (e. g. the new size is less
>>> + * than the current allocated size), the current allocation will be
>>> + * preserved unless __GFP_THISNODE is set. In the latter case a new
>>> + * allocation on the requested node will be attempted.
>>> + */
>>> + if (unlikely(flags & __GFP_THISNODE) && nid != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
>>> + nid != page_to_nid(vmalloc_to_page(p)))
>>
>> We need virt_to_page() here not vmalloc_to_page().
>
> Indeed, thanks. It is a c’n’p error, we had virt_to_page() in earlier patchsets (i. e. up until v10).
>
>>
>>> + goto alloc_new;
>>> +
>>> if (is_kfence_address(p)) {
>>> ks = orig_size = kfence_ksize(p);
>>> } else {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 16:47 [PATCH v11 0/4] support large align and nid in Rust allocators Vitaly Wool
2025-07-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to set node and align in vrealloc Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-08 14:03 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-07-09 13:40 ` Vitaly Wool [this message]
2025-07-09 14:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] rust: add support for NUMA ids in allocations Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:15 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] rust: support large alignments " Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:16 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] support large align and nid in Rust allocators Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 11:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 11:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 12:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 13:41 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 14:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 13:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 14:16 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 14:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 15:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 15:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-09 11:31 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-07-09 12:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7099B4C7-311F-466D-B12C-BDC52FE34A65@konsulko.se \
--to=vitaly.wool@konsulko.se \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox